Why does your application have to be deployed in Liberty? What's wrong
with a free, open source servlet container?
I noticed that the API mediation layer in Zowe is a Spring Boot
application. Spring Boot has to be the most popular Java web framework
right now especially for REST APIs,
Word on the street is IBM is moving off of RETAIN entirely. Get used to
salesforce...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 7:45 PM Clark Morris wrote:
> Since Salesforce isn't owned by IBM why is what could be something
> requiring potential decent degree of confidentiality such as Service
> Request when
I don't have a dog in this fight. IBM can use dBase III to store their data
for all I care. I don't own Salesforce stock.
But I would assume that every company that uses Salesforce considers their
data to be super confidential. What could a company consider more
confidential than sales leads,
Since Salesforce isn't owned by IBM why is what could be something
requiring potential decent degree of confidentiality such as Service
Request when dumps are involved being migrated there?
Clark Morris
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
What I have done is go through the Signon Process
Then use the Back Page at the top and find my entry I had started on.
I usually can save my details by going back one or two pages
It seems that I only have 5 mins before I am timed out. I have sent in an SR
HELP DESK REQUEST. Maybe if we all
On 9/26/2018 9:33 AM, Larre Shiller wrote:
As part of a recent audit, we have been goaded into updating the permission and/or audit
bits on certain Unix directories per the DISA STIG (which we use as our risk model).
Those directories include many that are shipped by IBM and it's a fair bit
Unfortunately for me, we discontinued my Resolve for zService subscription with
the migration to MFaaS.
I admit I haven't tried to enter a SR recently (my IBM id is still good), but I
think I'd need to go through our host's service account.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe
On 9/26/2018 10:21 AM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
Since moving to MFaaS, my ibmlink access is reduced.
This hasn't got anything to do with IBMLink. ETR disappeared a while back.
This complaint is about Service Request, which is transitioning to
Salesforce...
--
Phoenix Software International
Matt,
Yes sir as far as I know.
Scott
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 4:06 PM Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> z/OSMF has services that enable TSO services … your App is in Java and you
> want to host it in a Liberty container ?
>
>
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> m...@hogstrom.org
> +1-919-656-0564
> PGP Key: 0x90ECB270
It's bad enough we have to see the useless crap appended to emails from all
the silly-ass companies that do it, but now we have to deal with URL
vandalism by Microsoft and Cisco. Recent posts show some links wrapped by
one, and then re-wrapped by the other.
Take a second and delete all that junk
I don't know but it would seem not, wouldn't it?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 11:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ECB in XMEM Post
Is that
z/OSMF has services that enable TSO services … your App is in Java and you want
to host it in a Liberty container ?
Matt Hogstrom
m...@hogstrom.org
+1-919-656-0564
PGP Key: 0x90ECB270
I just read a book on Stockholm Syndrome,
it was pretty bad at first, but, by the end I kind of liked it.
>
Is that true for address spaces with non-reusable ASIDs?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Pageable should not be a problem. If the ECB is in a swappable address space,
that could be a problem.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Joseph Reichman
Sent: Wednesday,
Have you discussed with your auditors the risks associated with changing the
permission bits set by the product and service installs? Compliance with the
STIG could conceivably break something, and denial of service is itself a
security violation.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
ObNit; okay, a wrapper for IDCAMS ALTER NEWNAME
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Tony Harminc
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 1:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:09:05 -0400, Tom Conley wrote:
>On 9/26/2018 12:53 PM, Jousma, David wrote:
>> Yes, along with what seems to be about a 15 minute timeout. I've had SR's
>> open keyed in lengthy update, only to press submit, and get sent to the
>> logon screen again, and my updates
Yeah... I know.
That being said... perhaps the READ ONLY option is something that we can try.
Thanks for making that suggestion.
Larre
There is no way in that I'd be messing with permissions bits on anything
IBM provided. We do mount all of that READ only however so that contents
I guess I will look at my own trail. That's when I put the UPDATEFLAG=NOCHANGE
into our FDRABR SMS pool back-up.
I should have opened a PMR/SR then, when we we a direct IBM customer. Since
moving to MFaaS, my ibmlink access is reduced.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe
There is no way in that I'd be messing with permissions bits on anything
IBM provided. We do mount all of that READ only however so that contents
cannot be changed.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Nash, Jonathan S.
Sent: Wednesday, September
Dont sys admins usually write a shell script that sets premissions with chmod
or something like that ?
Do you guys have a guy who is good with shell scripts ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Larre Shiller
Sent:
On 9/26/2018 12:53 PM, Jousma, David wrote:
Yes, along with what seems to be about a 15 minute timeout. I've had SR's open keyed in
lengthy update, only to press submit, and get sent to the logon screen again, and my
updates gone. I've had to get back into the habit of cutting/paste my
On 25 September 2018 at 15:30, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> TSO RENAME is just a wrapper for IDCAMS RENAME.
No. It's a standalone TSO CP, IKJEHREN, that does all the work itself.
Well obviously it calls various services like DAIR, CAMLST, and so on,
but it is not a front end for IDCAMS. Not that
Yes, along with what seems to be about a 15 minute timeout. I've had SR's
open keyed in lengthy update, only to press submit, and get sent to the logon
screen again, and my updates gone. I've had to get back into the habit of
cutting/paste my updates into notepad "just in case" the update
Anybody else enjoy logging on to IBMLink, hitting the SR link, then
being presented a sign-in button that only requires you to press it, but
doesn't prompt you again for sign-on credentials? Maybe IBM
forcin...er...encouraging us to go to Salesforce?
Regards,
Tom Conley
--
As part of a recent audit, we have been goaded into updating the permission
and/or audit bits on certain Unix directories per the DISA STIG (which we use
as our risk model). Those directories include many that are shipped by IBM and
it's a fair bit of research/work. So... you can easily
Definitely take a look at IEAMSXMP *if you will always be running on a
supported version of z/OS.*
As I understand things it is impossible to do a perfect job of X-memory POST.
There is no way to write code that with absolute certainty will not POST after
its partner program has terminated and
We are developing solutions for a product and are a Partnerworld partner of
course.
Basic sending TSO code retrieving output.
Scott
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 1:59 AM David Crayford wrote:
> If you have purchased CICS you get CICS WLP. Same for IMS and WAS. There
> is no free WLP. IBM don't give
Works on Tops r15 no problem here, we have 2.2 and 2.3 z
Scott
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:43 AM Jousma, David <
01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I'm hoping not on both accounts! If something in Roscoe breaks, we'll
> have to address that.
>
> -Original Message-
We don't share mastercats, because there was not yet really a reason for it and
we have the updates well synchronized. The pro is of course that a mastercat
problem will be isolated to a single system.
Besides that, you will always have a number of mastercatalogs, at least 3 per
Sysplex,
Classification: Public
The "platinum" (or ) build says to have a single
master cat for all systems in a sysplex. Now I get that not everything is a
sysplex, but where it is, take caution.
Where you have master cats for other systems as user cats, there's a big red
flag - the system won't let
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:09:48 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>I tend to generally concur w/Brian, but I do want to add an observation.
>
>Any time there are (three of something) vs (one of something) you are (almost
>certainly) guaranteed to the one or more of the three, out of sync.
>Correction of
I tend to generally concur w/Brian, but I do want to add an observation.
Any time there are (three of something) vs (one of something) you are (almost
certainly) guaranteed to the one or more of the three, out of sync.
Correction of "out of sync" conditions is generally painful and involves a
I would be concerned in the fact that cross-memory POST is only deemed safe in
certain circumstances.
I believe that normal cross-memory POST does not validate the ECB-owning
address space STOKEN or TCB token.
IBM do offer IEAMSXMP which is a safe cross-memory POST protocol if
pause/release
I'm hoping not on both accounts! If something in Roscoe breaks, we'll have to
address that.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 9:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TSO RENAME broke?
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:16:01 +, Jousma, David wrote:
>Well, mystery solved. It's been broken at my installation for MANY years
>(pre-dates my employment here).SYS1.CMDLIB was in LINKLST concatenation
>after my favorite product (CA-Roscoe) which also has a member called RENAME.
Rob
This is just a question is your comment based on the fact the ECB might be in
pageable non/fixed storage and has potential for s0c4
Thanks
> On Sep 26, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
>
> Both Pause/Release and PC-ss are supported in SRB mode.
>
> The fact that you are in
Both Pause/Release and PC-ss are supported in SRB mode.
The fact that you are in recovery code (and possibly unsure of the status of
both ECB-owner and client) makes me believe that cross-memory POST is even more
undesirable.
Not saying that it cannot be done with cross-memory POST, but
You are right as it kills all registers besides 9
If memory serves me right I think the for the system or PC call
I know you are going to scream at me but the reason I choose the post is
because I’m posting This from a recovery routine as I don’t know whether it’s
TCB mode or SRB
I’m using the
Please be aware that cross-memory POSTs are not ideal and if possible I would
consider a redesign of your code to use other methods - for example :
(1) Pause/Release
(2) PC-ss service into ECB-owner ASID to issue POST on caller behalf
Just my 2c.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
-Original
Sorry I misunderstood
So if Address Space A would like to post Address B the ECB must be addressable
to to B as that is the Target the ASCB is that of the target Address space B
the ECB can be B private area in A all I need is the address of the ECB even in
private and ASCB of B
Thanks
On
>This is just another way of saying that for XMEM the ECB is in CSA right
?
No, not right.
What within the wording "must be addressable from the address space
identified by the ASCB parameter" makes you say that? Storage addressable
from an address space includes common storage (whether CSA
Well, mystery solved. It's been broken at my installation for MANY years
(pre-dates my employment here).SYS1.CMDLIB was in LINKLST concatenation
after my favorite product (CA-Roscoe) which also has a member called RENAME.
Somehow, it never occurred to me to check this.
-Original
Dave,
You had a similar thread on a variation of this topic in May of 2010. History
repeating itself? :-)
Open a PMR/SR to DFSMShsm development. I could not find a specific PATCH
example matching your need in any of the usual manuals containing PATCH
criteria.
Bob
-Original
Thanks
Joe Reichman
170-10 73 rd ave
Fresh meadows NY 11366
> On Sep 26, 2018, at 3:46 AM, Binyamin Dissen
> wrote:
>
> No, it means unlike the MF=E list, the ecb itself must be addressable from the
> target address space, not the POSTers primary.
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:49:54 -0400
No, it means unlike the MF=E list, the ecb itself must be addressable from the
target address space, not the POSTers primary.
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:49:54 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>Hi
:>
:>
:>
:>In XMEM Post bases on the fact that's ASC is Primary and in the control
:>parameters specify
I think the op might really be trying to decide if it's "better" to have a
single MCAT for the site and thus have the same view of "everything" or if
having individual MCATs for each LPAR and then sharing them as UCATs with the
"other" LPARs is better.
I have operated both ways and I really
47 matches
Mail list logo
