Hi,
We are having problems configuring Control-T to work with our new IBM TS7760.
We've gone through the documented steps, but things are not working right.
Our Configuration:
The computer has 4 partitions. There is no sharing of DASD between the
partitions.
Control-T is installed on all
I have copied the source code for Jol up to the www.Oscar-Jol.com
website. IBM examined and approved the code many years ago.
Jol effectively replaces the JCL interpretor and quite a lot of the
initiator when using Dynamic Allocation instead of JCL. It is part
compiler with PL/I style
Welcome to the new IBM.
And they think they're going to woo cloud customers with this level of
support...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
I'm officially going. Just saving up for all the expenses to get there from
Australia.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:55 PM Ed Jaffe
wrote:
> On 11/5/2018 11:34 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
> > If so, Jerry Whitteridge and I might be wandering around since we live
> in PHX
> >
> > Hope to see some
Take a look at DFSMS Object Access Method Planning, Installation, and Storage
Administration Guide for Tape Libraries, Chapter 4. Defining and monitoring
your configuration, Disaster recovery site considerations.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:53:55 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Some b0rken e-mail software makes proper quoting very difficult. Take m$
>lookout - please!
>
Yet some persist in using it. Worse, some employers requre it.
>
>From: Tony Harminc
>Sent: Wednesday,
Thank You - those worked.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Cieri, Anthony
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 4:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA034E
There is a sample z/OS FTP client user
There is a sample z/OS FTP client user exit in TCPIP.SEZAINST(EZAFCEXT).
In this sample exit, there are two "in-stream" macros called ABCINIT
and ABCTERM. The ABCINIT macro supports setting multiple base registers.
Hth
Tony
-Original Message-
From: IBM
I believe it would be more educational for you to show what you tried.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:50:16 + "Steely.Mark"
wrote:
:>The assembler program I am working on is receiving several of these messages:
:>
:>ASMA034E Operand =X' beyond active USING range by 148 bytes
:>
:>
:>I have
In addition to adding a second register to the USING you also have to load the
second register with (1st base register + 4096). Just specifying it on the
USING is not enough.
Your ENTER macro should support setting more than one base register for you
(most of the ones I have seen will do so
The assembler program I am working on is receiving several of these messages:
ASMA034E Operand =X' beyond active USING range by 148 bytes
I have tried all the examples to add a second register to the USING statement.
When the program executes it gets a S0C1.
Currently I have a macro call
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:49:42 -0500, Tony Harminc (t...@harminc.net)
wrote about "Re: VM (Subject clip volume with JCL)" (in
):
> On 14 November 2018 at 14:34, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> And, all, please trim the superfluous footers, disclaimers,
Hi,
Did anyone ever run into this problem at a DR site? At our production site we
have an automated tape library that looks like this:
TAPELIB1 AL 3584-L22888 248 6 113 Y Y
When we bring our LPAR up in DR we are getting an IGD330I Library Logical Type
Not Defined.
Some b0rken e-mail software makes proper quoting very difficult. Take m$
lookout - please!
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Tony Harminc
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 2:49
On 14 November 2018 at 14:34, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> And, all, please trim the superfluous footers, disclaimers, etc.
> (It's the malign consequence of top-posting.)
Better yet, don't top-post! Selectively quote, insert your comments
where they
On 2018-11-14, at 10:14:07, Nai, Dean wrote:
>
You're welcome.
But, please use a more informative Subject: in the future
for the benefit of members searching the Archives.
And, all, please trim the superfluous footers, disclaimers, etc.
(It's the malign consequence of top-posting.)
-- gil
Thanks Tony and Dave.
Dean Nai
On 11/14/18, 12:03 PM, "IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of David
Spiegel" wrote:
>Hi Dean,
>I haven't done this in a while, but ...
>The only ways to ICKDSF REFORMAT a "real" DASD Volume on a Guest VM, is
>to either ATTACH the Device
Hi Dean,
I haven't done this in a while, but ...
The only ways to ICKDSF REFORMAT a "real" DASD Volume on a Guest VM, is
to either ATTACH the Device or DEDICATE it.
AFAIK, you cannot REFORMAT a Full-Volume MiniDisk.
Regards,
David
On 2018-11-14 11:48, Tony Thigpen wrote:
> It works on a VM
It works on a VM volume or a VM mini-disk.
Tony Thigpen
Nai, Dean wrote on 11/14/18 11:44 AM:
Hi Tony,
Not a VM person but working on a DR now. Does that work for a VM volume?
Dean Nai
On 11/14/18, 11:07 AM, "IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tony Thigpen"
Hi Tony,
Not a VM person but working on a DR now. Does that work for a VM volume?
Dean Nai
On 11/14/18, 11:07 AM, "IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tony
Thigpen" wrote:
>Use REFORMAT in ICKDSF.
>
>Tony Thigpen
>
>Nai, Dean wrote on 11/14/18 10:18 AM:
>> Anyone
Use REFORMAT in ICKDSF.
Tony Thigpen
Nai, Dean wrote on 11/14/18 10:18 AM:
Anyone have any JCL to clip a VM volume from one name to another. Thanks in
advance.
Dean Nai
Senior z/OS Systems Programmer
Technical Services Group
Department of Information Technology
State of New
Anyone have any JCL to clip a VM volume from one name to another. Thanks in
advance.
Dean Nai
Senior z/OS Systems Programmer
Technical Services Group
Department of Information Technology
State of New Hampshire
27 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03301
work: 603-271-1529
Statement of
Thanks
> On Nov 14, 2018, at 8:41 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
>
> You have at least 2 options :
>
> (1) Build a parameter control block for your SRB to accept via IEAMSCHD PARM=
> keyword
> Your SRB scheduler can then populate any relevant information that the SRB
> needs to know
>
> (2) Locate
You have at least 2 options :
(1) Build a parameter control block for your SRB to accept via IEAMSCHD PARM=
keyword
Your SRB scheduler can then populate any relevant information that the SRB
needs to know
(2) Locate your SRB scheduler via trusted control blocks - i.e wherever the
PC-owning
I don’t think there is anyway to determine this since with ENV=STOKEN
PASN=SASN=HASN of the target address space correct ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
I was thinking about my last post
First off let me say a little bit about background
I have had some experience with vendors but it’s very light
Doing this type of programming was my passions unfortunately for me I got into
it after 2000 when IT destabilized
I am fortunate to have a landed a
So it's working (aka broken) as coded and the only way to get it fixed is to
open an RFE, take 2 aspirins, and then take a bottle of sleeping pills - then
by the time you wake up you'll have completely forgotten about the issue and
moved on and IBM still won't have fixed it.
If they agree it's
In article
<5713005125545930.wa.extern.sven.siebertvolkswagen...@listserv.ua.edu> you
wrote:
> this issue could be fixed:
> SYS1.SIELANKE has been added to DFHRPL concatenation, and now it works.
Great! That makes sense. It's been so long since I've done any CICS,
I had forgotten about that DD.
this issue could be fixed:
SYS1.SIELANKE has been added to DFHRPL concatenation, and now it works.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
W dniu 2018-11-12 o 17:50, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
[...]
Others:
o At times I've needed to resort to PDS rather than PDSE because of
cross-plex sharing constraints on PDSE.
o Does PDSE impose a stricter constraint on number of records in a
single member than PDS? Perhaps 16Mi?
Yes. PDSE
Hello Listers!
Does anyone have any experience with compiled REXX, in general... is it worth
it?
Any thoughts on compiled XMITIP..
As always, thanks for all your feedback.
- Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
MARKSANDSPENCER.COM
Unless otherwise stated above:
31 matches
Mail list logo
