Re: A new LPAR entry in a existing IODF

2019-02-05 Thread Peter
Hi, Thanks all for the response We are shutting down our z114 box and have just few weeks so wanted to try learn something out of it and it's an opportunity which I won't get as we have already moved our production to a new z hardware. So trying to explore some activity which can give me some go

Re: DFHSM FIXCDS before start-up?

2019-02-05 Thread Gibney, Dave
So, the idea of running DFHSM with a a limited ARCCMDxx as part of the CDS restore job is not viable! Message ARC0009I DFSMSHSM STARTUP ATTEMPT FAILED, NOT A STARTED TASK happens So, I guess I have no choice but to document it as a task to be performed post 1st IPL of the recovered system And,

Re: IPCS ADPLSEQS

2019-02-05 Thread Don Poitras
In article you wrote: > Since 2008, forwarding to Bob has been possible only via a literal > "ether net" connection. Unfortunately, the IBM mail network does not > have such a connection. We wish it did. We as well find understanding > how to use some of the IPCS macros to be challenging.

Re: IPCS ADPLSEQS

2019-02-05 Thread Jim Mulder
Since 2008, forwarding to Bob has been possible only via a literal "ether net" connection. Unfortunately, the IBM mail network does not have such a connection. We wish it did. We as well find understanding how to use some of the IPCS macros to be challenging. > It is. It has the feel of an

Re: Internal Coupling Channel on z13

2019-02-05 Thread Seymour J Metz
It is possible to convert ENQ with SYSTEMS to RESERVE, but the performance ramifications are unacceptable. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tony Harminc Sent: Monday, February 4,

Re: Style (was: Newbie SMP/E questions)

2019-02-05 Thread Seymour J Metz
LISTSERV and Netnews are both good; Stack Exchange is not bad; most of the other options run from bad on down. I find both gmail and outlook to be pathetic. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on

Re: A new LPAR entry in a existing IODF

2019-02-05 Thread Seymour J Metz
ITYM a series of devices; HCD defines device numbering independent of any OS, while the UCB is a control block specific to z/OS (and its relatives). You can change the logical CHPID associated with a physical CHPID without re-cabling. What are you really trying to do? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Me

Re: COBOL 4.2, 5.1 and 5.2 EOS Dates

2019-02-05 Thread Allan Kielstra
Apologies: The V5.1 and V5.2 date is April 30, 2020. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: JES2 SCHEDULE statement

2019-02-05 Thread Carmen Vitullo
replying to myself, I see that my user and myself were confused about SCHEDULE and BEFORE and AFTER, not related. jobgroup is what I think he's looking for and after I activate z22 level we can test. thanks Al and David Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Carmen Vitullo"

Re: JES2 SCHEDULE statement

2019-02-05 Thread Carmen Vitullo
yeah, I have z22 active on my test image, and the $Tactivate shows it would be successful in prod, I'm just procrastinating - thanks again Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Tu

Re: JES2 SCHEDULE statement

2019-02-05 Thread Jousma, David
>>HASP JOBGROUP activation requires Z22 checkpoint level Forgot about that. We did it long ago. Nothing to worry about, just do the test activate first to make sure your checkpoint is large enough. _ Dave Jousma Mainframe Eng

Re: JES2 SCHEDULE statement

2019-02-05 Thread Carmen Vitullo
KC got me again, when searching for the JES2 Schedule Statement, 2.3 was the default, I should have stuck with my 2.2 books I have local my user ran another test based on the examples David provided, it 'worked' with the kaviot, HASP JOBGROUP activation requires Z22 checkpoint level I had

Re: JES2 SCHEDULE statement

2019-02-05 Thread Nims,Alva John (Al)
In my z/OS 2.02 version of MVS JCL Reference, there is NO "AFTER=" option on the SCHEDULE statement. There is an "AFTER" JCL statement: "AFTER statement Purpose: Use the AFTER JCL statement, along with GJOB and JOBSET statements, to define jobs and sets of jobs that must execute in a par

Re: Style (was: How can I get reports in the Output Queue in SDSF to print)

2019-02-05 Thread Phil Smith III
Paul Gilmartin wrote, in part: >Good idea. But why not start each of your responses on a new line? And >distingush original text by ">" quotation marks or indention? Does not >MS-Exchange, which appears to be your mailer, support such things? A nit, Gil: Exchange is an MTA, not an MUA. Ou

Re: IPCS ADPLSEQS

2019-02-05 Thread DanD
Thanks for your help Don. I finally did get the symbol defined correctly … symbol 00. ASID(X'0046') DSPNAME(symbol) LENGTH(X'1000') AREA(symbol) DROP I was priming the ESSY with a DSECT=NO version and it had a -1 as the asid word. I was only updating the

Re: IPCS ADPLSEQS

2019-02-05 Thread Don Poitras
In article <7271721887429173.wa.zos.jes2gmail@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote: > The ESSY is rather odd ??? > If I use ABITS=64 it this request gets a RC 12. > When I list the symbol I get >symbol 00. ASID(X'0026') LENGTH(X'1000') AREA(symbol) DROP > If I issue "L symbol DSPNAME(symbo

Style (was: How can I get reports in the Output Queue in SDSF to print)

2019-02-05 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 17:10:52 +, McCabe, Ron wrote: > >I found it easier to put my responses below after each of your questions. > Good idea. But why not start each of your responses on a new line? And distingush original text by ">" quotation marks or indention? Does not MS-Exchange, which a

Re: IPCS ADPLSEQS

2019-02-05 Thread DanD
The ESSY is rather odd … If I use ABITS=64 it this request gets a RC 12. When I list the symbol I get symbol 00. ASID(X'0026') LENGTH(X'1000') AREA(symbol) DROP If I issue "L symbol DSPNAME(symbol)" and list the symbols again a mysterious "X" symbol is defined … X

Re: DFHSM FIXCDS before start-up?

2019-02-05 Thread Gibney, Dave
I regenerate my DR restore jobs at the end of the daily FDRABR DR back-up jobs. We use DFHSM for migration and application ack-and restore. When practicing the DR recovery, I need to restore DFHSM using the most recent CDS back-up. So, this scenario is that I've just restored all CDS (and JRNL)

Re: How can I get reports in the Output Queue in SDSF to print

2019-02-05 Thread McCabe, Ron
Vince, I found it easier to put my responses below after each of your questions. Thanks, Ron McCabe Mutual of Enumclaw -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Vince Getgood Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2019 1:41 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: H

Re: JES2 SCHEDULE statement

2019-02-05 Thread Carmen Vitullo
No problem, it didn't wrap on my end, looks good, thanks David Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 10:11:05 AM Subject: Re: JES2 SCHEDULE statement

Re: JES2 SCHEDULE statement

2019-02-05 Thread Jousma, David
Sorry about the wrap. That wasn’t how I sent it. _ Dave Jousma Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original Messa

Re: JES2 SCHEDULE statement

2019-02-05 Thread Carmen Vitullo
No David, I'm not sure, the only testing I've done was with the holduntil, looks like the jobgroup is required for the AFTER= statement by the looks of your working example Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To

Re: JES2 SCHEDULE statement

2019-02-05 Thread Jousma, David
Are you sure you have the syntax correct? Here is a jobgroup I actively use to run my z/os cloning jobs. I am at V2.3 however. //TESTG JOBGROUP ERROR=(RC>4),ONERROR=FLUSH //TESTA GJOB //TESTB GJOB // AFTE

COBOL 4.2, 5.1 and 5.2 EOS Dates

2019-02-05 Thread Allan Kielstra
More than once on this forum, folks have asked about when Enterprise COBOL V4.2 will enter EOS. This announcement has the details: http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/2/897/ENUS919-022/index.html&lang=en&request_locale=en V5.1, V5.2 will be EOS May 30, 2020.

JES2 SCHEDULE statement

2019-02-05 Thread Carmen Vitullo
I'm running z/OS 2.2 @ RSU1805 level and one of my users is trying to use the JES2 schedule statement; from all the doc I found the AFTER=jobname should be valid @ 2.2 but they are getting a JCL error during testing, my test had the same results; 3 // SCHEDULE HOLDUNTL=('09:50','02/05/20

Re: DFHSM FIXCDS before start-up?

2019-02-05 Thread Allan Staller
Why would you want to do this? I presume you have the health-check recommended 4 backups (or more). If the current backup is 'N', the next backup would be taken to N+1. N will not be overwritten for 3 additional cycles. More than long enough to make a backup copy. To answer your question about fi

Re: CryptoExpress zeroize domain

2019-02-05 Thread Greg Boyd
You can zeroize individual domains from the SE as well. Both are on the Crypto Configuration panel. I don't know of any way to do it from ICSF. Greg Boyd www.mainframeCrypto.com On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 17:42:18 +0100, R.S. wrote: >AFAIK there are ways to zeroize CryptoExpress engines using HMC/SE

Re: A new LPAR entry in a existing IODF

2019-02-05 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2019-02-05 o 10:48, Peter pisze: Thanks I would like to change the CHPID for a series of UCBs. Do I need to recable it or using the same port I can assign a different CHPID ? You can do the following: a) change cabling to CUs (not devices) - but why? b) change PCHID/CHPID numbering - t

Re: A new LPAR entry in a existing IODF

2019-02-05 Thread Mike Shorkend
Peter I am not sure what you are trying to achieve. The CEC has physical Channels called PCHPIDs which map to logical CHPIDs. You have some UCBS connected via a CHPID. Why would you want to change them? On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 11:49, Peter wrote: > Thanks > > I would like to change the CHPID for a

Re: [EXTERNAL] ARC1139I RC39 RSB08

2019-02-05 Thread Wheeler, Simon
Hi, We use hold commands in the ARCCMD parm member to prevent an lpar from recalling, but it's allowed to put requests on the common queue (this was because we used to be short on tape drives). E.G. ONLYIF HSMHOST(2) HOLD RECALL(TAPE) ONLYIF HSMHOST(2)

Re: DFHSM FIXCDS before start-up?

2019-02-05 Thread Gibney, Dave
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of retired mainframer > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 8:26 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: DFHSM FIXCDS before start-up? > > Why would overwriting the CDSs during a CDS backup be a problem? You stil

Re: A new LPAR entry in a existing IODF

2019-02-05 Thread Peter
Thanks I would like to change the CHPID for a series of UCBs. Do I need to recable it or using the same port I can assign a different CHPID ? Regards Peter On Wed, 30 Jan, 2019, 8:34 PM R.S. Simply run HCD and play. > You cannot destroy prod data (it will be WORK IODF), so feel safe > playing

Re: How can I get reports in the Output Queue in SDSF to print

2019-02-05 Thread Vince Getgood
Ron, Forgive me, but it sounds like you are a little out of your depth with this. Z13 doesn't allow a CTC? Since when? AFAIK, you can have a FICON CTC on ANY z hardware. "TCPNJE has been working for nearly 3 years and then all of a sudden it isn't and networking says it's a mainframe prob