ADATA RECORD LAYOUTS

For the record layouts, see High Level Assembler for z/OS & z/VM & z/VSE Programmer's Guide, Version 1 Release 6 in Appendix C kennethkri...@gmail.com -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:28:16 -0400, william giannelli wrote: >I just want to see replies to my posts….. So use the Web Interface to look at only entries you want to see: http://listserv.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=IBM-MAIN Change your Listserv setting to NOMAIL. -- Dale R. Smith

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

On 15 Mar 2019 14:28:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:) billgianne...@gmail.com (william giannelli) wrote: I just want to see replies to my posts….. It's possible you shouldn't have asked this question. It sounds as though you want to ask questions and get answers without

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

I'm thinking of my high-school Philosophy class where we tried to figure out if some particular action was good or evil. One approach was to look at the action and ask, "What if everybody did it?" On 3/15/2019 2:28 PM, william giannelli wrote: I just want to see replies to my posts…..

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

Put a special sequence of characters in the subject of your post and configure your mail reader to flush any IBM-MAIN messages without this sequence. Unfortunately, this will also cause you to miss any replies from people who respond to the digest without updating the title. Set your account

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

I just want to see replies to my posts….. On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 2:23 PM g...@gabegold.com wrote: > This surely isn't what you want/mean -- but related -- long ago I had the > idea for list-owner command "SET username BOZO". That would be a list > option so idiots only see their posts (so they

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

The right answer to the wrong question. If you read the reference you cited, you will note that "MATHML" can refer to either https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MathML#Presentation_MathML or to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MathML#Content_MathML. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

On Mar 15, 2019, at 11:27 AM, Seymour J Metz mailto:sme...@gmu.edu>> wrote: That raises one of my standard question templates: what do they mean by "MATHML"? Usually the answer to such question is "The minimum we can get away with", but one can always hope.

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

Thanks, Wendell! FWIW, this thread is simply full of constructive feedback that I actually always love receiving. I haven't felt beaten upon on here in at least a few years. ;-) Even if I do again at some point, I'll know that it stems from frustration with one of our outputs and therefore

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

This surely isn't what you want/mean -- but related -- long ago I had the idea for list-owner command "SET username BOZO". That would be a list option so idiots only see their posts (so they know list works) and no others (so they think list has dried up) and wander away. Similar to

Re: SMPe "rollout" of maintenance

We have needed to manage/maintain multiple releases of "MVS" for decades. We always create a new CSI for each release and tie all components to that CSI with DSN qualifier(s). There is NO mix-n-match. The main motivator is that while a CSI can have multiple TARGET and DLIB zones, it can have

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

Thanks all for your info, I’ll be opening a PMR. On Friday, March 15, 2019, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > I can't guess what this particular error is about, but in general your > first action should be to look here: > > "GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SIGYHFS LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS >

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

I sometimes use Google Groups to access a thread because, for example, it displays all responses chronologically regardless of the thread branching - makes it easier to print or forward complete feedback from you all. I poked around there and found an "Email updates to me" topic option that

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

On 2019-03-15 12:25, Steve Smith wrote: Not sure going 100% output-only is a great way to participate, but otoh, I can see the appeal. If only there was a reliable way to detect topic drift and stop off-topic replies from being sent... ;) -- Regards, Gord Tomlin Action Software

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

I *think* what he is asking for is what other forums (apple comes to mind), is that when you submit a question, or reply to a question, you are automatically "subscribed" to that thread, and get any and all updates via email to that thread. I don’t think that LISTSERV has a way to do that.

VCHID for Hipersocket

We are upgrading our boxes from zEC12 to z13. One of the interfaces we have been using is Hipersocket and for z/13, manuals say that for Hipersocket, the VCHID (Virtual Channel Id) should be at the range of 7E0-7FF. We have used CHPID Mapping Tools and the IODF generated for this channel set

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

I can't guess what this particular error is about, but in general your first action should be to look here: "GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SIGYHFS LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS IGYCOB2J IN SYSMOD JADB62H. THE RETURN CODE (12) EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE VALUE. DATE

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

I believe you can email LISTSERV with: SET IBM-MAIN NARCISSIST OK, just kidding...but seriously, what is the point here? On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:31 AM Bill Giannelli wrote: > A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here.. > How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:45:46 -0700, retired mainframer wrote: >A highly philosophical response here... > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism >If you don't see anyone else's posts, how would you know to respond? > >If you originate a question, how would you see the answers? -- gil

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

A highly philosophical response here... If you don't see anyone else's posts, how would you know to respond? If you originate a question, how would you see the answers? > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of Bill Giannelli > Sent: Friday, March 15,

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

Please open a PMR against COBOL V6.2. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:25:53 -0400, Steve Smith wrote: >That would be your "Sent" folder, and just set up a rule to trash all >incoming from IBM-MAIN. > That's slightly different from automatic Cc: which woule place them in your inbox after a long round trip. Or you could tell LISTSERV to SET

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

Write Only Memory? CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity. Original message From: Steve Smith Date: 3/15/19 9:25 AM (GMT-07:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts? That would be your "Sent" folder,

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

That raises one of my standard question templates: what do they mean by "MATHML"? Usually the answer to such question is "The minimum we can get away with", but one can always hope. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

That would be your "Sent" folder, and just set up a rule to trash all incoming from IBM-MAIN. Not sure going 100% output-only is a great way to participate, but otoh, I can see the appeal. sas On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:59 AM Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:48:45 -0400, Gord Tomlin wrote: >On 2019-03-15 11:31, Bill Giannelli wrote: >> A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here.. >> How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from everyone? > Why? Interesting. You can use REPRO=NO to exclude your own posts, but I

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

On 2019-03-15 11:31, Bill Giannelli wrote: A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here.. How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from everyone? thanks I use a separate email address for IBM-related listservs, and I configure my email client to automatically cc myself on my

Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here.. How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from everyone? thanks Bill -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

Yes. It is one of the steps in the Program Directory. _ Dave Jousma Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

On 3/14/2019 10:18 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 21:40:18 -0400, Mike Shaw at QUICKREF wrote: > QUICKREF, too? -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

Hi Sue, I know we've beaten on you pretty badly here. So now that I've had time to use some of them, I thought I'd say that I really like the look of the new PDFs. You can't please all the people all the time, and you could never please all of us any of the time! Thanks for working so

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

FMIDS seems to be for Cobol base and i didnt run IGYISMKD and is this required for Enterprise Cobole V6 versions? //IKJEFT1A EXEC PGM=IKJEFT1A //SYSEXEC DD DISP=SHR, // DSN=#smphlq.HADB620.F3

Re: Sysadata record types for HLASM

AASMMAC1(ASMADATA) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Joseph Reichman Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 6:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Sysadata record types for HLASM Would anyone know where I could find

Sysadata record types for HLASM

Would anyone know where I could find documentation for this Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

Did you run job IGYISMKD before the apply? Also, you are failing on the FMID for what looks like Japanese support. Do you need that? _ Dave Jousma Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President david.jou...@53.com 1830 East

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

when i searched for reason code 0594003D its sounds BPXFVLKP 10/27/17 JRDirNotFound: A directory in the pathname was not found

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

Maybe your /SYSX/usr/lpp is MOUNTYd as R/O? On 2019-03-15 08:29, Vinoth Meenakshi wrote: > Yes, i followed and created a directory /SYSX/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2 and > changed the DDDEF as /SYSX/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2 and ran the apply and > still face the same error. > > we are planning to

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

Please post the text, including the error message from the BPXPRINT DD statement. _ Dave Jousma Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

Yes, i followed and created a directory /SYSX/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2 and changed the DDDEF as /SYSX/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2 and ran the apply and still face the same error. we are planning to have only one version and all both 6.2/6.1 fmids are in ERROR state on SMPE. Please let me know

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

Did you follow the instructions in the Program directory for allocating, mounting, and creating the proper directory structure? Also, just so you know, if you have a prior version of Ent COB installed, it will be deleted. If you need both around, install the new one in its own target and

GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

Hi, I have ordered COBOL V6.2 CBPDO package and received the package to my Global zone and when i was trying apply i could see the below GIM messages and i couldn't get much info from the ibm site, have anyone faced the similar issue. we are upgrading from V6.1 to V6.2 Below is the apply

Re: IBM SFG - Your Opinion

We just upgraded to Co:Z SFTP Version 5.5.0. Thank You! Len Sasso System Administrator General Dynamics Information Technology 327 Columbia TPKE Rensselaer, NY 12144 Phone: (518) 257-4209 Cell: (518) 894-0879 Fax: (518) 257-4300 len.sa...@gdit.com URL: www.gdit.com -Original Message-

Re: Software volume category

Kees, You explained how it works, thank you for your help. It does not differ to much for real tapes. I also use DEVSUP custom-defined categories for library (volume) partitioning purposes. Does it answer my questions? Unfortunately no.  :-( (My questions are for better understanding,

Re: Software volume category

The TS7700 VTS uses categories, not in private or scratchpools. Each virtual tape has a category. The OS (z/OS, z/VM, z/TPF) issues a 'mount from category ' when it needs a scratch tape. When a tape is written, the OS changes the category to 'its' private category. When the tapemanagement