Does anyone here have any example code / links / info on writing ipltext
with ICKDSF on z/vm 6.2 or vmEsa 2.4?
I've read through GC35-0033-42 (ICKDSF Users Guide and Reference v
17), but it "stops short" on the details of how to include either the IPLDD or
BOOTSTRAP text in an exec file.
thx
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:44:17 -0400, Steve Smith wrote:
>Make your screen bigger :-).
>
Does that make the command area bigger?
On some applications it doesn't. Even worse, in some cases it wraps the input
area
in a pillarbox, making insertng characters painful.
>You should be able to end a
Make your screen bigger :-).
You should be able to end a line with \, enter it, then continue with more
stuff.
Or, edit it into a script file.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:34 PM Klein, Kevin wrote:
> I've been looking for an answer to this for the better part of 2 days.
>
> When I enter TSO OMVS
Use the "\" (backslash) character, from the "UNIX System Services User's Guide"
"Entering a long shell command
If you are typing a long command that will not fit on the command line, you can
use the \ (backslash) continuation character at the end of the first line. When
you then press , the
I've been looking for an answer to this for the better part of 2 days.
When I enter TSO OMVS on my ISPF screen, is there a way to make the command
area larger than 2 lines.
I have a long command I want to enter that doesn't fit on the two lines I
currently have.
Apologies is this is a basic
Thanks Mike.
The apps I'm working with already have their own APPID, for profiles, etc.
As for PASSLIB, my understanding is that's required for the LIBDEFs to be
effective for the app, if they are issued before the SELECT NEWAPPL.
i.e.
a) in some menu: SELECT (%SETUPXXX)
SETUPXXX:
LIBDEF ...
On 3/22/2019 10:14 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
Steve,
Forgot to mention that NEWAPPL is *required* when your application has
its own application commands defined in an application command table in
the ISPTLIB concatenation. ISPF can't honor the application commands if
it can't find the
On 3/22/2019 10:14 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
I am wondering if there's any significant difference in the two ways. I
don't really expect to see any difference, just looking to see if some
expert knows that there's better performance or recovery or whatever one
way or the other.
Steve,
We
Update: IBM has opened APAR PH09408 for this issue.
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:35:44 -0600, Dana Mitchell wrote:
>As I posted about several months ago, do not try to use the Workflow
>'Customization for z/OSMF Plugins' as it has the annoying habit of
>translating your entire IZUPRMxx
Well manually, no. I can think of two tools that can do it on the fly, SRS and
STOPX37, but they also tailor the index extent size, unless it's RRDS. A VSAM
file is really two space allocations, one for the DATA portion and one for the
INDEX portion.
Alter would only work if the file is
What is EXIM, chopped liver?
I had a few gigs at organizations that used the SPOOL to mail facility, one of
which migrated to CSSMTP.
IBM is like Quantum Mechanics; you may be able to make accurate predictions but
don't try to make sense out of the internal workings - you'll just get
I'm building some clists for a couple of applications that will LIBDEF
their libraries, instead of having them concatenated. I see two subtly
different ways to do these: a) SELECT the clist, which after the LIBDEFs,
SELECTs the product's main entry with NEWAPPL & PASSLIB. b) SELECT the
clist
On 3/21/2019 5:17 AM, Styles, Andy (ITS zPlatform Services) wrote: [snip]
> I'm now trying to get the "Workload" and "SrvClass" fields that SDSF displays:
>
> I can't figure out where these fields come from - and I don't know therefore
> whether they'll be easy
Andy, those are indeed found in
Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>Look up "z/OS marketing and service announce, availability, and withdrawal
>dates" in the below link
>https://www.ibm.com/support/home/links/97/product/5381496/z/OS_-_All_versions_and_releases?results=55
Thanks Sri h Kolusu! When it comes by publishing in IBM-MAIN these
14 matches
Mail list logo
