Still seems to have the terrible twos.CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse
the brevity.
Original message From: Chris Hoelscher
Date: 4/7/19 6:15 PM (GMT-08:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: happy
birthday internet RFC 1 turns 50 today !!Chris HoelscherTechnology
I don't think I've seen this on these lists -- it's been highly
recommended to me over several years!
---
11th Annual ECC Conference, June 9 - 1 1, 2019
Marist College, Poughkeepsie, New York
https://ecc.marist.edu/
https://ecc.marist.edu/web/conference2010
The 11th Annual ECC National
RFC 1 turns 50 today !!
Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
Humana Inc.
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Humana.com
(502) 476-2538 or 407-7266
--
For
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 00:58:08 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>I doubt that anyone who scored a passing grade in Audit 101 would let this
>mechanism fly today. It is very easy to implement but is totally
>uncontrollable as to who can issue what command under what circumstances. It
>might have
I doubt that anyone who scored a passing grade in Audit 101 would let this
mechanism fly today. It is very easy to implement but is totally uncontrollable
as to who can issue what command under what circumstances. It might have made
sense in 1969. Not in 2019.
-Original Message-
From:
Hi
Looking at IARST64 macro the documentation for 2.3 says one of the
parameters is EXECUTABLE=YES/NO/SYSTEM_RULES
Yet the macro in SYS1.MACLIB doesn't have that parm.
Further more get I execute 64 bit code from the storage gotten from IARST64
Thanks
On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 18:26:32 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>The separator line must have only CRLF;
>...
True. However, since CMS and VM spool abominate empty records,
the VM SMTP daemon strips trailing blanks, there by forgiving nonempty
blank lines and, in turn, breaking classic uudecode
Hi Bill,
This can be done via DFSMSdss (provided that you don't mind seeing
AFDR111I in front of your message).
Example:
//DSSWTO01 JOB (ACCT),
// ' ',
// CLASS=A,
// MSGCLASS=X,
// MSGLEVEL=(1,1),
// REGION=0M,
//
Yes, I meant blank in the sense of empty; it is definitely incorrect to have a
space there.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
I wouldn't be the reputation of a crooked politician that nobody uses case
sensitive local parts. The golden rul for e-mail is to use the address that the
intended recipient gave you and don't try to make it prettier.
Reading the RFCs isn't dangerous; reading urban legends about them is. RFC
It doesn't matter, as long as you don't care whether all of your outbound
e-mail is delivered. OTOH, if you want it delivered then it does matter. But
it's not my dog.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
The separator line must have only CRLF; the data terminator must have only a
period followed by CRLF.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
And there is support to prevent the use of // COMMAND. IMHO a well run shop
turns it off. Using it to issue a SNED command is like using a stick of
dynamite to kill a fly.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
Thanks
Missed that one
> On Apr 7, 2019, at 1:54 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> If the extraction-authority control is set then you can use IVSK.
>
> I suppose that you can use TPROT in the sense that you can use a hammer to
> fasten screws; cruel, but all very well for a spree.
>
>
> --
>
If the extraction-authority control is set then you can use IVSK.
I suppose that you can use TPROT in the sense that you can use a hammer to
fasten screws; cruel, but all very well for a spree.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Hi
I am looking to determine storage key of an Address I am thinking baesd on
the Condition code set by TPROT I should be able to determine this
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Ok I tried with a larger record length and it went fine ..
On Sun, 7 Apr, 2019, 8:49 PM Lizette Koehler,
wrote:
> I was going with this as UCM
>
> Oracle Webcenter Content Server (UCM) is the preferred method of file
> transfer for FBL as well as HDL data loading tools. It is the replacement
>
I was going with this as UCM
Oracle Webcenter Content Server (UCM) is the preferred method of file transfer
for FBL as well as HDL data loading tools. It is the replacement infrastructure
for staging data files for FBL and supersedes the sftp option provided with
Oracle HCM Cloud in prior
Under IPCS:
IPLDATA
STATUS WORKSHEET
CBF PSA0
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
"IBM Mainframe Discussion List" wrote on
04/07/2019 02:55:02 AM:
> From: "Brian Westerman"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 04/07/2019 11:44 AM
> Subject:
On 2019-04-06 16:19, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
Not worth the effort and risk for a
measly doubling of virtual address space.
In fact, given the availability of 64-bit addressing, the 2 GB
difference between 31-bit and 32-bit is just a blip. It's like attaching
a garden shed to the Empire State
On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 07:19:02 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>
>5) How you know the lines being sent are between 1-80 characters in length?
>
Bear in mind that if charset=UTF-8 it may look like 80 characters on the
desktop, yet not fit in FB-80.
What's a "UCM type file"? First hit:
Could you show us the following. Mask what you need to
1) FTP Control cards?
2) the entire FTP process and messages
3) The attributes on the file on the mainframe side?
4) How you know the lines were truncated
5) How you know the lines being sent are between 1-80 characters in length?
Does VM simulate those instructions that are found in the virtual guest
environment but not on the real hardware? I don't find the *concept* to be
inconceivable, although the reality may very well be a different matter.
There was recently a discussion on the assembler list about how VM
The minimum ARCH for z/os 2.3 is ARCH=10 (zEC12/zBC12, z13/z13s, z14)
z114 is not in ARCH=10, so thats why everyone is confused...
Joe
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 1:55 AM Brian Westerman <
brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com> wrote:
> Well,
>
> Tell me what you want dumped and I'll get it to you. All
Another reason for separating CICS workloads is security. CICS transaction
separation can only really be achieved through separate address spaces.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw | Security Lead | RSM Partners Ltd
Web: www.rsmpartners.com
‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like
Well,
Tell me what you want dumped and I'll get it to you. All of the sites are
merely waiting for their new hardware to be delivered and since all of them
were already running z/VM I installed from their z/OS 1.13 client machine (one
was z/OS 1.10) and they all came up fine on the first try.
I dodged the “why multiple CICS regions?” aspect as this thread has already
got complex enough. The “CICS topology” topic is wonderfully complex, of
course, and it’s one of the things my workshops with customers delve into.
I would say “QR TCB Constraint” is still a live issue, but less of one.
27 matches
Mail list logo
