On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:13:25 -0500, Bruce Hewson wrote:
>SMS will catalog in the MASTER CATALOG. It does override the
>access rules. It really is important that ALIAS entries are defined
>for any GROUP or USER created. If the USER has access to create
>the dataset then SMS will catalog that
> I think you new my intent
I have no interest in arguing with the willfully ignorant. I'm no more a
telepath than you are, and if you are going to respond to your hallucinations
about what is in my head instead of responding to what I wrote then I will
allow you to wallow in your
JS has things called classes and objects, but their behaviors are not what the
OO community means by object oriented.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
David Crayford
Sent:
POSIX(ON) is perfectly fine for new code.
From an administration perspective, the user running a POSIX(ON) program needs
a RACF OMVS Segment. That's really not that big a deal. Obviously, if you run
in USS, you already have that set up.
If you have existing code (say COBOL) that is running
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:47:42 +0100, Charles Mills wrote:
>...
>FWIW, POSIX(ON) is not a problem. "My" code all runs POSIX(ON).
>
What motivation is there for POSIX(OFF)? Compatibility with lost source code?
>-Original Message-
>From: Allan Kielstra
>Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019
I imagine it is quite a few steps ahead of z/OS Unix System Services
keeping up with Unix / Linux commands.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:48 PM Charles Mills wrote:
>
> Alan, thanks. We've spoken at the TDM. I hope I was not too hard on you
> guys.. I'm aware of the product of which you speak and
Alan, thanks. We've spoken at the TDM. I hope I was not too hard on you guys..
I'm aware of the product of which you speak and why IBM supports it. (Can I say
its name and the reason here or is that NDA?)
I've semi-retired from full-time hard-core C++ development and product
architecting, so
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:13:41 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>I will give them a try :)
>
>But, I will again take this opportunity to plea for the return of Bookmanager
>format :)
>
It's a hard business case to make to IBM when some documents have
outgrown the capabilities of Bookie and some COTS
> Anyway read the link and give the compiler a try!
I have, and it works - very well! If you haven't tried this compiler, you
should. There are some limitations, but if you like the 64-bit LE programming
model, this compiler is a win.
-- Jerry
64-bit only?
Does this amount to a "stabilization" of support for 31-bit XLC/C++
compilers?
BTW: I'm happy to move to 64-bit after IBM supports 64-bit storage for most
of their OS services, in the mean time its a PITA with no real advantage
for us.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:41 AM Allan Kielstra
Hi Charles
We are listening!
https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/xlCC++V231ForZOsV23?OpenDocument
This is a web deliverable that co-exists (does not overwrite) the existing xlC
compiler. I have personally used it to develop C++ code with initializer
lists,
Billy,
even simpler:
//SORT01 EXEC PGM=SORT
//SYSOUTDD SYSOUT=*
//SORTIN DD *
FRUIT ORANGES FLORIDA SKU#1
FRUIT ORANGES ARIZONA SKU#1
FRUIT ORANGES ARIZONA SKU#2
FRUIT GRAPESWISCONSIN SKU#3
FRUIT GRAPESIDAHO SKU#4
FRUIT GRAPESOREGON
The IDUG DB2 - L list serv forum covers Db2 LUW as well as z/OS Db2.
https://www.idug.org/p/fo/si/topic=19
db...@lists.idug.org
Chris Bowen
Macro 4 Limited
A Division of UNICOM Global
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
I know I'm a little late to the party but I think I am extremely qualified
to answer this question: for the past nine years I have used MSVS to edit,
syntax check, and in some cases alpha test thousands and thousands of lines
of C++ for a very successful z/OS product. Let me say
- Yes, casts
14 matches
Mail list logo
