Thanks Bruce for still helping us.
So if IEBGENER cannot reliably process them, nor can ftp apparently, who can?
Why can AMATERSE?
Where is all this documented?
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Marchant
gib...@wsu.edu (Gibney, Dave) writes:
> Unfortunately, my search for Phil's tables ended here.
> https://audifans.com/mirror/www.isham-research.co.uk/mips.html
you are better with this from wayback machine ... 2016
Thanks debugging the amode 64 was the thing that got me have zos explorer which
I would need to debug amode C but getting it to work to me days and.
I plan on using TEST to debug the metal
Writing my own fread and fopen should be easy
Thanks
> On Nov 8, 2019, at 1:29 AM, David
> Do we need ICSF to be running while implementing ATTLS ?
I ran AT-TLS on a 2.1 RDT system *without* ICSF without a problem. And it was
for more than just TN3270 traffic at TLS 1.2. I haven't tried at a higher z/OS
level, but I don't think you need ICSF.
Regards, Barbara
One of the reasons, several years ago, that we decided not to do automated
email the way IBM has implemented theirs was because the setup that we would
have had to force on the client site was extremely difficult and there are
several moving parts that have to all be in sync. It took me almost
nosearch,search(/usr/include/metal) will do it.
I hope it works out for you WRT Metal/C! If it were me, I would be
inclined to always use LE C unless I was writing system level code.
On 2019-11-08 12:01 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
Hi
I am using Metal C to Compile my program, in my
Hi
I am using Metal C to Compile my program, in my search parameter I specify
SEARCH(/USR/INCLUDE/METAL/) however the compiler seems to put the LE
libraries first
Anyway to undo this
SEARCH(//'CEE.SCEEH.+', /usr/include/metal/)
thanks
Cheryl keeps her MIPS chart up to date and provides regular updates via the
Tuning Newsletter. The boilerplate claims next year it will only be available
via the Subscription avenue.
https://watsonwalker.com/publications/tuningletter/cpuchart/In a message dated
11/7/2019 4:05:57 PM Central
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 21:07:42 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Yes, but the two links provided by Parwez Hamid are much more current.
Yes, they are. The links he provided were for the z/OS 2.2 LSPR data.
The z/OS 2.3 LSPR data include z15. You can find lots of LSPR information at
sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) writes:
> Of course, IBM does not claim that those numbers reflect a Meaningless
> Indicator of Processor Speed (MIPS), but rather a well defined (LSPR
> ITR) benchmark.
Jim Gray was one of the primary behind people original SQL/RDBMS,
System/R ... and then left
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=63=isg1PI98413 says, in
part:
"CBPs for Tenant Resource Group".
Of course CPB also means "consumption-based pricing" in some z contexts,
and then there's always Customs and Border Protection, who do use IBM Z.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:29 AM R.S.
Yeah, I miss a lot of people here, e.g., Bruce.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 4:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
True, but I miss Phil. The question remined me of him. Should have waited until
tomorrow ..
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 1:08 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: MIPS chart for
Yes, but the two links provided by Parwez Hamid are much more current.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 3:50 PM
To:
Not[*] the Hebrew, but there are certainly EBCDIC code pages that handle
Romance languages.
I'm using a web-based e-mail client, and I have no idea how the web server is
configured, but the host code page should be irrelevant. It's certyainly not an
EBCDIC code page.
{*} Well, I can get
Unfortunately, my search for Phil's tables ended here.
https://audifans.com/mirror/www.isham-research.co.uk/mips.html
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 12:38 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
More speculation...
Capacity Boost Processor(s)? (z15) Maybe something planned that was
eventually implemented with
the use of zIIP or making sub capacity engines full capacity for System
Recovery Boost?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
ITIL v3
Of course, IBM does not claim that those numbers reflect a Meaningless
Indicator of Processor Speed (MIPS), but rather a well defined (LSPR ITR)
benchmark.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Have you submitted an RCF? You might mention directory information as well.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 3:40
Not quite. FTP is fully capable of transmitting datasets with the correct
options. That, however, is for z/OS<->z/OS, not for z/OS<->PC. If you need to
transmit RECFM=U to a PC then you must encapsulate with, e.g., terse, xmit, zip.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Radoslaw,
Feel free to call me "Bob". Richards is my last name.
Please view UA97969 in total. You will see the relationship there. I did not
think it was appropriate to cut and paste the entire PTF here.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Richard,
No, it was reponse to Mike's post. Mike provided link to Share
presentation about MQ in sysplex. CBP is (was) one of the sysplex links.
It was thick copper cable 10 meters long (no longer versions), it was
replaced by Infiniband and later by CS5.
Obviously old sysplex channel has
If you were responding to me, I beg to differ:
++ PTF (UA97969)/*
//UA97969 JOB 5698-97969,SA300,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),CLASS=A */ .
++ VER (Z038)
FMID(HWRE410)
PRE (UA97308,UA96965,UA95433,UA92819)
SUP (UA97081,BA55159,BA55157,AA55159,AA55157)
/*
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION(S):
IMHO the problem is with using file utilities for datasets.
File - understood as MS-DOS, unix or Windows file - it is just (ordered)
set of bytes. No internal structure like blocks or records. File formats
like XLS, TXT, DOC are interpretation of some applications, it is not
visible
Dataset -
On 11/7/2019 9:49 AM, Jake Anderson wrote:
Do we need ICSF to be running while implementing ATTLS ?
Jake,
Yes.
Regards,
Tom Conley
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
I've got some answers off-list (thanks you authors!)
CBP is part of new feature/solution. The feature wasn't announced so
there is no clue about it.
However it seems planned feature is canceled, so it is dead end.
So CBP is for future purposes which will never happen. (Or it will?)
My humble
No, this is different CBP. In this case it is sysplex link, obsoleted
for several CPC generations.
It is typical, an acronym can have multiple meanings.
(no, I don't want to re-start war about USS)
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2019-11-05 o 21:43, Mike Schwab pisze:
The only
Thanks Tom for quoting Bruce. May he rest in peace knowing that he was a giant
among men in this industry!
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 10:41 AM
To:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 02:21:29 -0600, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>"We don't document that you cannot wash dishes with a CPU!"
That's a good one, Barbara!
This discussion has come up before, and I thought I remembered
someone saying that DFDSS will write blocks up to 64K bytes, so I
looked and found the
Thanks Kolusu!! It worked perfectly.
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Sounds like a good reason to wait.
$DS($EDSQ*)
$HASP003 RC=(52),D 262
$HASP003 RC=(52),D S($EDSQ*) - NO SELECTABLE ENTRIES FOUND
$HASP003 MATCHING SPECIFICATION
mail is not getting to the list :(
I have an open case (PMR) with IBM Z/OSMF support due to this and other issues,
It started with JES2 support and JES2EDS, there is a PTF to fix some issues
with JES2EDS not shutting down with JES2
$PJES2, my case has been open since August 27th, traces,
Do we need ICSF to be running while implementing ATTLS ?
On Wed, 30 Oct, 2019, 2:22 PM Mike Wawiorko, <
014ab5cdfb21-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> 3270 with SSL/TLS is implemented in System SSL - if you really need to
> know more I'd read up on that.
>
> Another PAGENT policy
Yea, tried that too. If I get JES2EDS address space fired up, it may work.
Looking at books to get ZOSMF notifications configured too. Looks like a bunch
of additional security setup needed.
Good grief! $HASP003 seems to be a bundle of 167 not-obviously-related
messages. Anyway, for RC=(89) the explanation doesn't appear relevant.
You might try $PJ9832... I wouldn't bet on it working, but I would that you
found a bug.
sas
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:52 AM Jousma, David <
Does anyone know if you can type TERM CON 3270 After an IPL in 3215 console
keyboard mode on a Z/OS 1.13 Z/VM guest machine? Will it put in in CP WAIT and
force a re-ipl?
Thank you
carlos.marti...@downstate.edu
--
For
Aww, Peter. You had to go and shut down the speculation. As you said, it was
entertaining! :-)
There is one PTF that I am aware of the belongs to System Automation 3.5/4.1,
but that is the only reference I was able to discover.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
The speculation is entertaining. But you should not expect any information
to be forthcoming.
At this point it is my understanding that there are no product
deliverables for which "CBP" is relevant.
Yes, you can see fields in control blocks with CBP in their name. And you
might see "CBP"
So, after playing around on my tech system with JCL NOTIFY statement with
email, I found that I have some additional configuration to do to enable,
namely setup the JES2EDS in security. Don't really have time to mess around
with making that and ZOSMF email setup to work at the moment.
The odd
Hi, Have you tried
https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/lib03060.nsf/pages/lsprITRzOSv2r2?OpenDocument
Cheers
Stephen
On 07/11/2019 08:16, Peter wrote:
Hi All
I am looking for a document which describes all the IBM machine model with
their MIPS, SU/sec etc .
There used to be used
Ok, back with ftp then. It keeps thing a little simple.
As Americans, they should know that they must document that you cannot dry your
cat in the microwave.
If ftp cannot handle the standard recfm=u format, it should be corrected or
documented, not left to the customer to discover it (crashing
>Did you transport the catalog dump dataset with ftp?
Yes. I started out just adrdssu dumping the catalog, then ftp'ing. After
restore and import the catalog was broken. Putting terse between the dump and
ftp fixed the problem.
>If yes, this might again point to ftp.
>If not, the problem must
Information provided by Parwez is exhaustive and it covers all the IBM
model.
Thanks.
On Thu, 7 Nov, 2019, 12:10 PM Christian Svensson, <
022ad63487ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Are you perhaps referring to topgun-tech's site?
>
>
Peter,
Are you perhaps referring to topgun-tech's site?
https://www.topgun-tech.com/specs/imb-zsystems-mainframes/ibm-z114-ibm-2818/
Regards,
Christian
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 08:41 Parwez Hamid wrote:
>
> https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/lib03060.nsf/pages/lsprITRzOSv2r2?OpenDocument
44 matches
Mail list logo
