On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:03:59 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>What do you mean by "the initial program"? The TMP doesn't need to be in any
>list.
>
>There are a few caveats on authorization.
>
> Whether the entire linklist is autoorized depends on what you have in
> PARMLIB.
>
> Anything in
from a purely TSS standpoint, Setup omvs sectrace for TSS. It will provide
a lot of output. Combine with SECTRACE for mvs side of things.
Or the regular omvs security report and audit everything. Also a lot of
output but should show most things.
The other thing would be to rachet up debugging
Hi Dave,
I wasn't aware that a Jenkins slave was able to run natively under USS. At the
last place I worked, Jenkins was being used off mainframe to interface with
z/OSMF and Zowe to execute and manage the tests.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:06:19 -0500, zMan wrote:
>So, no reflection on Mark for posting, but: pretty boring story. Hardware
>problem was hard to diagnose. This is special?
>
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:21:59 -0500, Mark Regan wrote:
Ah. Well, yeah. But since light bulb presumably LOOKED OK to the eye, not
clear they didn't actually do that. We've all been there, wound up
Easter-egging and fixing it thus. But that's just debugging.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 5:16 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> What was special was not checking the
5. ISPF/PDF EDIT has facilities not present on the PC editor you're
using.
FWIW the PC editor I use most is TSPF; I'll give it up when I have a clone of
the current ISPF/PDF EDIT or they pry it out of my cold dead fingers.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
What was special was not checking the easy things first, hence pillage then
burn.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
zMan
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 5:06 PM
To:
Thanks Lionel. I'll take a peek at it, but our current direction is to
piggyback on similar pipeline functionality our installation is already using
for all the other platforms as much as possible. Your solution appears to be
a very nice implementation, from what I have read, but doesn't
So, no reflection on Mark for posting, but: pretty boring story. Hardware
problem was hard to diagnose. This is special?
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:52 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> https://jhs-shop.com/products/copy-of-wizard-of-id-print-pillage-then-burn
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>
There is now a tool that will let your mainframe developers who are
currently very productive using ISPF to interface to git. Check out
https://zigi.rocks for more info.
The V1R1 is about to be released into the wild - a release candidate is
current available for the brave. This update addresses
All,
We are evaluating moving from standard green screen application development to
using the new tooling including iDZ-> GIT -> IBM DBB, ->Jenkins -> Urban Code
Deploy, etc. Working on a mini POC in the sandbox, and am having a hard time
finding z/OS security requirements for running the
Uhhh, looks the List is still up but the distribution server has the hiccups.
Don't know when and if-yet.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Thought Zebulon Glitz might have zinged us.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
https://jhs-shop.com/products/copy-of-wizard-of-id-print-pillage-then-burn
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mark Regan
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 3:21 PM
To:
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3447337/a-real-light-bulb-moment.html
Regards,
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1 USNR-Retired,
Nationwide Insurance, Retired
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Nov 20, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Jake Anderson wrote:
>
> I was trying to define control Unit 7001 for dasd and while connecting to
> CHPID 0C it threw a message saying it is already connected to another
> control unit 7000.
>
> I have defined CHP 0C as shared
>
> Is there anything I am missing
Hi
I was trying to define control Unit 7001 for dasd and while connecting to
CHPID 0C it threw a message saying it is already connected to another
control unit 7000.
I have defined CHP 0C as shared
Is there anything I am missing here ?
Jake.
On 11/14/2019 9:25 AM, Michael Stein wrote:
...
>> Q2. ... Because PHTM is for all types
>> of SRBs. Is this the correct understanding?
My CMG95 paper on these fields should help. I don't recall if that
paper covered enclave tasks as well, but from the standpoint of the
fields under
18 matches
Mail list logo
