this is under z/OS 2.3:
//BWTESTER JOB (xx,xx,xx),'BRIAN WESTERMAN',MSGCLASS=V,
JOB07842
//CLASS=R,NOTIFY=,TIME=1440,TYPRUN=COPY
00020056
//* REFER WESTERB.PDS.DATA(COMMANDZ)
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:34:59 -0500, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
>Any suggestions on how to speed up cp copying multiple file to and from z/OS?
>
>I gave SHAREAS=YES. Anything else? Can I control buffers or ?
>
What's on the non-OMVS side? a PDS(E)? Multiple PS data sets?
I might suggest as an
Any suggestions on how to speed up cp copying multiple file to and from z/OS?
I gave SHAREAS=YES. Anything else? Can I control buffers or ?
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website: www.lbdsoftware.com
Sent from my iPhone 8+
Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are,
There's at least one on bitsavers.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Mark S Waterbury [01c3f560aac1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June
Hi Carmen,
"there's no such thing as a dumb question" comes to mind. No need for
any corner for you. I also learned a bit of history and now know why
that site Kolosu mentioned looks like so much rubbish now...
cheers,
Peter
On 16/06/2020 10:31 pm, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
Kolusu, reached
I think he may be thinking of the old SHARE Program Library Agency "catalog" of
programs.
I think CBTTape.org may have a copy of at least one of those ...
Mark S. Waterbury
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
OK, so it isn't the JES2PARM MSGLEVEL - I just changed my JES2PARM in the 2.4
sandbox to (1,1) and did a cold start, and TYPRUN=COPY still doesn't work. I
was hoping for an easy fix - or at least an easy explanation.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
It also works on my 2.3 system but not on my 2.4 system.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:47 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hi Michael and Allan,
>
> It's interesting that this works for one of you and not for the other. I
> got an offline response as well and it works for this individual too.
> Could the
The default MSGLEVEL was 1,1 and that’s what was coded on the jobcard.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:47 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hi Michael and Allan,
>
> It's interesting that this works for one of you and not for the other. I
> got an offline response as well and it works for this individual
Hi Michael and Allan,
It's interesting that this works for one of you and not for the other. I got
an offline response as well and it works for this individual too. Could the 2
of you (and anybody else who is interested in this and would like to chime in)
check what your JES2 JOBCLASS
I get the same thing you do under z/OS 2.4. About 12 lines of output. I
have SDSF.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a
> competing product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my
Works for me with no issues. However I use sdsf.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization.
Hi Joe,
Alas, not my problem. This APAR is for a lot more specific issue, as it has 4
criteria that need to be met before the S0C4 occurs. My issue happens any time
TYPRUN=COPY is used. Plus, we have the fixing PTF for the S0C4 already
applied. :-)
Thanks,
Rex
-Original Message-
On mine, it's ALT and Insert. I think that may map to PA1.
Bobby Herring
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elaine Beal
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 12:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] z/OS Master Console Commands
CAUTION: This
There is an APAR for 0C4 in JES2 when TYPRUN=COPY...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57427
Joe
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a
> competing product. As part of our testing of
Hello list,
I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a competing
product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my coworkers submitted a job
with TYPRUN=COPY on the job card and found it doesn't work. Under 2.2, we get
the entire input stream before the JES2 job
Are you sure? Either way, the pseudocode keeps retrying the STCK until
CVTLSO stabilizes.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 9:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Either way there is a potential error as the field does not indicate the time
range it applies to.
Your solution is incorrect if the STCK time was before the leap second was to
be added but the refetched LSO applies for after the time.
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:52:52 -0500 Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:16:13 +0300, Steff Gladstone wrote:
>We need to capture the date and time in a GLUE and need more precision than
>the CICS variables give us.
>
There's a possible timing window in naive leap second
correction. Suppose:
STCK
(a leap second occurs, adding 1 to
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:16:13 +0300, Steff Gladstone wrote:
>We need to capture the date and time in a GLUE and need more precision than
>the CICS variables give us.
>
What precision do you need? Minute? Second? msec? µsec?
What does CICS supply?
>Can we use the STCKCONV macro in a GLUE?
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:16:13 +0300 Steff Gladstone
wrote:
:>We need to capture the date and time in a GLUE and need more precision than
:>the CICS variables give us.
:>Can we use the STCKCONV macro in a GLUE? Could it cause all of CICS to
:>enter a wait? Or is it essentially pure CPU?
Pretty
When I was forced to use edge I found it to be worse than IE, at least from the
user perspective; it might have better security for all I know. At Home I use
Firefox, and I might wind up with Falkon ( https://www.falkon.org/about/).
Are you seeing an use of Konqueror
Kolusu, reached out to me personally and I replied to the wrong message and my
response went to this forum, so I need more coffee.
thanks for the kind words and now that my response is 'out there' I have to
apologize to Mark for naming names. As a novice it's sometimes frustrating when
the
Carmen - never put yourself down. While you may not be 'as smart' as some, I'm
sure you are 'smarter' than some as well. We each bring to the table
(forum/life) our own skills and capabilities which complement rather than
replace those of others.
Flames should be reserved for fires and stars,
Kolusu, thank you for the history lesson, I personally would never 'advertise'
(suggest) this site if I knew how low some folks will go to sell answers, I
know of a couple of industries that do this, ask.com, I think was the first
site I ever came across that you could ask a question and for a
I wouldn't use a non-evergreen browser! But some companies want to
control updates which is probably corporate policy albeit brain-damaged.
I would be leery about connecting to the internet using IE!
On 2020-06-16 7:36 PM, Scott Chapman wrote:
Increasingly rare though.
Looking across all of
Increasingly rare though.
Looking across all of our customer requests for the last month or so, I do see
users who came in on IE, but in every one of those instances, somebody else
from the company came in on Chrome, Firefox, or Edge (which the earlier
versions weren't that much better than
We need to capture the date and time in a GLUE and need more precision than
the CICS variables give us.
Can we use the STCKCONV macro in a GLUE? Could it cause all of CICS to
enter a wait? Or is it essentially pure CPU?
Thanks,
Steff Gladstone
28 matches
Mail list logo
