On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:02:01 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>>>...
>> Is 2009 good enough for you?:
>> https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ftp/demo/?C=M;O=D
>
>Perfect. I have to say, that's a superbly documented piece of code.
>
Did you see a User's Manual? (Rob was inferring the rules from
On 9/06/2021 3:10 am, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 22:16:54 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
Is FLOWASM open source or do you have a mates shared version?
Is 2009 good enough for you?: https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ftp/demo/?C=M;O=D
Perfect. I have to say, that's a superbly
So does DITTO. I also have my own HLASM tape copy programs that use
basic CCWs for tape I-O that I could modify, if needed, to read the
readable sections of the tape.
The bigger problem is the programs that created the back-ups. For many
of the tapes, we don't even know their internal format
Martin
Now, i'm working with smf99 subtype 1 and 8
Regards
JCarlos
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List en nombre de
Martin Packer
Enviado: martes, 8 de junio de 2021 07:35
Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Asunto: Re: Format SMF record 99
The OP didn't specify
Doesn't FDR's FATS and FATR have the ability to read tapes, and skip unreadable
blocks? Some
data is better than no data at all.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 4:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
I have customer 3490 tapes from the 90's in my storage vault. (I also
have good 3490 drives.)
We told the customer that we do not know if the tapes were even readable
when we got them 8 years ago. The told us:
"We don't care. As long as we can tell the auditors that we have the
tapes, we
W dniu 06.06.2021 o 16:20, Joe Monk pisze:
"There is another requirement here: to read REAL tape using PC tools.
How to read?
a) dataset by dataset
b) whole tape => AWS tape image"
Radoslaw,
Hercules has a really cool utility called TAPECOPY! It reads a real tape
and copies it to an AWSTAPE
Rule of thumb: you don't need old tapes, you may need old data.
In my former life I had 20 years old data, but the tapes were approx.
2-3 years old (max.). And always replicated, always in two locations.
For old media (tapes, optical, hdd's, whatever) the earlier you start
reading them the
Condition handling can be quite helpful, especially when I want to report sn
error to a PL/I caller.
That said, the default LE handler certainly could put out better messages.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 22:16:54 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>
>Is FLOWASM open source or do you have a mates shared version?
>
Is 2009 good enough for you?: https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ftp/demo/?C=M;O=D
>As I mentioned earlier in this thread we are looking at using FLOWASM
>for Metal/C code,
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:46:23 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote:
>...
>> But breaking lines in that fashion diminishes the usefulness of line
>> numbers reported in ASMA435I messages.
>
>This assertion is just flat-out wrong. Continued lines do not get new
>statement numbers. A statement, no matter how long
On 8/06/2021 3:43 pm, Rob Scott wrote:
(a) imposes a severe restriction on the long-lines facility by requiring that
column 72 be blank. The programmer could accommodate that by coding such as
0C' ', but that's worse than old-fashioned continuation.
I re-read the commentary in the exit this
The problem is the message, not the ABEND code. And, Yes, the message after a
program check (ABEND) should reflect the original interrupt code (ABEND code
and reason code).
Unless the user turned off SPIE, the user should never see an ABEND S0Cx
intercepted by LE; and, yes, the LE message for
On 6/8/2021 6:37 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 07:43:41 +, Rob Scott wrote:
...
"Blank Elimination / Wrapping of Long Lines:
...
4) If the statement is still too long:...
b) If the operand is too long to fit, it is wrapped and continued in column 16
of the
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 07:43:41 +, Rob Scott wrote:
>...
>"Blank Elimination / Wrapping of Long Lines:
>...
>4) If the statement is still too long:...
> b) If the operand is too long to fit, it is wrapped and continued in
> column 16 of the next line along with any commentary. "
This was a fun trip down memory lane, I remember the Overland device.
And if memory servers me correctly you had to load the tape through the
mechanism manually, there was at least the ne I tried in the early 90's no
autoloader. Why could this be important is because the most likely
I have a perplexing situation that has been assigned to me. The CBU activation
expire time generates a call. An associate mentioned a way to turn it off at
the HMC. Is there IBM documentation that describes how to configure this? The
system may generate a ticket each day until it expires.
Are you wanting to convert security options? If so, take a look at the
SECMIGR command.
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/z-netview/6.2.1?topic=descriptions-secmigr-nccf-cnme8004
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 7:25 AM Steve Beaver wrote:
> Does anyone in the group have NetView® under full RACF control and
Global glitch: swaths of internet go down after cloud outage
Numerous websites went offline briefly after an apparent widespread outage at
the cloud service company Fastly, and there were still reports of sporadic
disruptions after the company patched the problem an hour later.
>>(a) imposes a severe restriction on the long-lines facility by requiring that
>>column 72 be blank. The programmer could accommodate that by coding such as
>>0C' ', but that's worse than old-fashioned continuation.
I re-read the commentary in the exit this morning and it states :
"Source
The OP didn't specify which subtype(s). For example, 99-14 is very
different from 99-6. And, having worked with 99-14 a fair amount, it has
quite a complicated layout.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
WW z/OS Performance, Capacity and Architecture, IBM Technology Sales
+44-7802-245-584
email:
Hi,
I can put one together if you like.
Which subtypes and which fields are you interested in?
To get anything meaningful out of the records, if there's some madman-like
calculations required on top of just parsing the records (like finding CPU use
etc. in SMF 30)... then it's stil possible
22 matches
Mail list logo
