First episode of counting number of primes in various languages has been
uploaded to
https://www.youtube.com/c/DavesGarage/videos .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQtFdsEcK_s
Only 45 languages. 1500 languages claimed on
http://www.99-bottles-of-beer.net/
There might also be a locally developed variation at your shop. Mine has
two competing versions. It’s not difficult to create such a tool using
ISPF variables ZSCREENI (current screen image) and ZSCREENC (current cursor
position).
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 15:24 Mike Hochee wrote:
> Excellent!
On 7/8/2021 2:25 PM, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
Delete noscratch does work, remember to point to the catalog you want to remove
the entry from
delete 'sys1.vvds.v' - noscratch - catalog('catalog.name')
I do this just in to be sure
Haha! Don't know why we didn't try that simple option.
Thanks
Delete noscratch does work, remember to point to the catalog you want to remove
the entry from
delete 'sys1.vvds.v' - noscratch - catalog('catalog.name')
I do this just in to be sure
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message-
From: Ed
To: IBM-MAIN
Date: Thursday, 8 July 2021
Delete Noscratch will work for VVDS entries with no matching volume. I've used
it many times.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Classification: Confidential
Delete NSCR against the VVDS cluster should work; I am not aware of any
"automated" way to do this.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed
Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 3:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
We found dozens of VVDS references in our catalogs for which the volumes
no longer exist.
The manual seems to suggest you must create an empty volume and VVDS and
DEFINE RECATALOG the VVDS in order to permanently delete/uncatalog it.
That seems like an inordinate amount of work, particularly
Excellent!
Thank you much,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of David Spiegel
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 3:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF cursor positioning based edit or browse
Caution!
Hi Mike,
ZOOM on CBT File 671
Please see cbttape.org
Regards,
David
On 2021-07-08 15:00, Mike Hochee wrote:
Hi,
Some years ago I recall working in an environment where I could position my
cursor anywhere within a DSN or DSN(mbr) (from an ISPF edit or view session)
and then depress PFnn to
Thank you, that worked - the alternate screen for ST does have MAX RC on it
when I scroll right.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Richards, Robert B. (CTR)
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 2:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there
Hi,
Some years ago I recall working in an environment where I could position my
cursor anywhere within a DSN or DSN(mbr) (from an ISPF edit or view session)
and then depress PFnn to start and stack a new view or edit session for the
referenced DSN. I believe this capability was also available
Classification: Confidential
Use the "arrange" subcommand to move the MaxRC to the visible screen.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Feller, Paul
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 1:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there an SDSF display
Type a ? on the command line for the alternate screen.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 2:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Is there an SDSF display column for maximum return code of a job?
I
Peter at least in my shop the "ST" screen in SDSF has a Max-RC (Max-RC: Return
code information for the job) column. I had to scroll to the right to see it.
I also a Max-RC when I look at my (H) held output. Now based on the SDSF
manual I should also see a Max-RC on the "O" output display
I would like to be able to see the maximum return code of a job in any SDSF
display that may have such a column, but I am not seeing one in any SDSF
display I am authorized to use.
Is there perhaps some optional column that could be specified that my sysadmins
have not populated for us?
z/OS
I receive 8 emails from IBM-MAIN yesterday, many more on Tuesday.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, July 8th, 2021 at 9:06 AM,
Classification: Confidential
Is it just me, or was traffic really low in the last 12-15 hours?
::DISCLAIMER::
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended
for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed
Appreciate your help and it worked now
Thanks
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 at 12:24 AM, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 18:51:07 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:28:35 -0500, Vinoth wrote
> >abour File Permission change:
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
