It invites the possibility ...
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Jaffe
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 2:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: LOAD with ADDR
On 8/27/2021 1:18 PM, Charles Mills
On 8/27/2021 1:18 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
The BALR hazard exists even in the simple, non-GLOBAL case
Yes, but it is isolated. There is one address space, and the owner of an
address space is always totally responsible for what goes on there. GLOBAL is,
well, global.
GLOBAL=YES does not
> The BALR hazard exists even in the simple, non-GLOBAL case
Yes, but it is isolated. There is one address space, and the owner of an
address space is always totally responsible for what goes on there. GLOBAL is,
well, global.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:24:02 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote:
>
>Non-SMS managed data sets *might* still be subject to this restriction
>even if SMS is active. I'm not sure on that point.
>
It's my understanding that SMS will write an EOF if DSORG=PS. It will
not write the EOF if DSORG can not be
If its DB2 run MEPL
If it’s a CA product run CAMODID
Anything else run ABLIST on all modules
In all cases sort the output by PTF# match the ptf# to the entry in your CSI to
determine the associated RSU
Chris Hoelscher
Lead Sys DBA
Kyndryl on assignment to IBM Global Technical Services on
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:14:33 +, Holst, Jeffrey A wrote:
>
>I am thinking that at one time I read that if a data set is allocated (IEFBR14
>perhaps) but has yet to be opened it will be missing the end of file
>indicator, which can cause problems for a program that reads it.
>
"at one time"
On 8/27/2021 12:14 PM, Holst, Jeffrey A wrote:
... at one time I read that if a data set is allocated (IEFBR14 perhaps) but
has yet to be opened it will be missing the end of file indicator, which can
cause problems for a program that reads it.
Your memory is not failing, however SMS solved
A developer is having an issue with a program.
The odd thing is that if he reruns the job it works. One thing worthy of note
is that the input is 2 concatenated sequential datasets. The second one is
empty.
I am thinking that at one time I read that if a data set is allocated (IEFBR14
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 10:43:31 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>MVS provides no such serialization.
>
>A GLOBAL=YES object "just is." It could be entered any way one chose: BALR, or
>LINK, or ATTACH, or its data could be referenced with L and MVC.
>
>Here is the problem @Peter is referring to: once
MVS provides no such serialization.
A GLOBAL=YES object "just is." It could be entered any way one chose: BALR, or
LINK, or ATTACH, or its data could be referenced with L and MVC.
Here is the problem @Peter is referring to: once you make the code available
"globally" there is no general,
Consider, for example, DC A(FOO-BAR) where FOO and BAR are in different
CSECTs that may be scatter-loaded.
That's a reason not to use the SCTR option unless it is relevant.
And it is relevant to z/OS only for loading the nucleus.
But the binder does not know your intent.
Do any assembler
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 08:36:10AM -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
>
> LOAD with GLOBAL=YES also performs the same function flawlessly -- and
> comes with the additional feature of automatic cleanup at termination
> time (assuming that's the behavior you want).
>
>
> The "automatic cleanup at
The binder and linkage editor manuals have attempted to describe the load-time
behaviors of modules according to the link-time parameters. (Similarly for the
binder FETCHOPT). This is somewhat unfortunate, as while it is reasonable to
expect some description of the options in those manuals,
Wow! Who woulda thunk it, unless you actually been there? Good to know. Thank
you!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Relson
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 8:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: LOAD
Hi Rob,
thanks for your answer. This make sense. In our environment this dataset only
exists in our (SMP/E) maintenance environment and not in our runtime
environment. But we're working with SDSF without any problems. This dataset
comes into view because of PTF UI75454 which replaces a module
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:36:10 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
>
>LOAD with GLOBAL=YES also performs the same function flawlessly -- and
>comes with the additional feature of automatic cleanup at termination
>time (assuming that's the behavior you want).
>
>
>The "automatic cleanup at termination" is
This dataset contains the IPCS models for some SDSF control blocks.
Combined with the ISFIPCSP member of SISFJCL, an IPCS user can issue something
like :
CBF address STR(ISFx)
This will display the memory from the dump in the format of the SDSF ISFx
structure.
Historically this
Is it to help migration?
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 14:51, Juergen Kehr wrote:
> Hello,
> looking into our z/OS system I found a SDSF dataset SYS1.SISFMIG, but
> couldn't find where this library is used for and what its purpose is. A
> GOOGLE search dosn't help. Can anybody help? Even more I would
I am not sure what z/OS release you are working on, but your program
directory should provide some information for that PDS
Carmen
On 8/27/2021 9:06 AM, Juergen Kehr wrote:
Hello,
the findings in Google with SISFMIG and IBM only show some listings which
contain the dataset, but they tell
Yup, related to SDSF. Look at HQX7790. Which is in the modules of our dataset.
Carmen also correct. ISF.SISFMIG.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, August 27, 2021, 10:12 AM, Don Poitras wrote:
Just based on the name, I'd guess it's to be used when debugging SDSF
problems.
Just based on the name, I'd guess it's to be used when debugging SDSF
problems. Allocated to STEPLIB along with SYS1.MIGLIB when using IPCS.
In article <5d896e64-8646-299d-8470-3f74cdef8...@hughes.net> you wrote:
> That PDS, as delivered is ISF.SISFMIG, I'd be checking, searching that
> name -
Hello,
the findings in Google with SISFMIG and IBM only show some listings which
contain the dataset, but they tell nothing about its purpose.
Kind regards.
Juergen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
That PDS, as delivered is ISF.SISFMIG, I'd be checking, searching that
name - I don't recall off hand what it is used for
Carmen
On 8/27/2021 8:51 AM, Juergen Kehr wrote:
Hello,
looking into our z/OS system I found a SDSF dataset SYS1.SISFMIG, but couldn't
find where this library is used for
Add IBM to the Google search.
sisfmig IBM
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, August 27, 2021, 9:51 AM, Juergen Kehr
wrote:
Hello,
looking into our z/OS system I found a SDSF dataset SYS1.SISFMIG, but couldn't
find where this library is used for and what its purpose is. A GOOGLE
Hello,
looking into our z/OS system I found a SDSF dataset SYS1.SISFMIG, but couldn't
find where this library is used for and what its purpose is. A GOOGLE search
dosn't help. Can anybody help? Even more I would line to know, if this library
is really needed in an runtime environment.
Kind
LOAD with GLOBAL=YES also performs the same function flawlessly -- and
comes with the additional feature of automatic cleanup at termination
time (assuming that's the behavior you want).
The "automatic cleanup at termination" is in almost 100% of cases
considered a system integrity error (or
No, it is a text file containing one of IBM's old descriptions of the
reusability option in *the binder* and in now way makes any claim about the
linkage editor. Further, it is incorrect: RENT by itself is not enough to
protect a module from modification. Contrast wit Module reusability at
The favicon is a .txt file containing a copy of IBM's definitions of
REUS, RENT, REFR - and of what they mean and do, from the OS/390 V2R7 CD
collection.
As we say in French (about REUS, RENT, REFR): "on a changé tout ça". ;-)
I reattach it. Click on it, if it is not displayed automatically.
Incorrect and out of context.
In general, there is a difference between the processing of reusability
attributes between the linkage editor and binder. Also, the subpool used
depends not only on the reusability attribute but also on the authorization
status of the concatenation.
See also
29 matches
Mail list logo
