As we have already discussed, program objects do get
rounded up to 4k multiples. Load modules do not.
I am a big fan of looking at dumps. We always have hundreds
of them readily available around here.
Here is an excerpt from SUMMARY FORMAT ASID(1) EX(GL)
on a z/OS 2.5 standalone
O/T - I was a user on one of those Tektronix displays from about 1979 to
1982, but no 3277 or mainframe. Mine was connected to a DEC computer,
all put together by a company called ComputerVision.
This pic shows almost exactly what I used:
Back in the 1980's, when I was using MVS full time, we had some
Tektronix graphics displays connected to an adapter on some of our 3277
terminals. These displays had storage screens where the screen could
only have new stuff written to it. When the display got too cluttered
you would have to
"Not all modules have or need a 4 KiB alignment." Indeed, for "modules"
(as in CSECT/RSECT MODs, within an LMOD.) But LMODs themselves are
loaded into page-aligned storage.
The LP (load point) addresses of LMODs always end with x'000' (i.e.
page-aligned) - and the addresses of all MODs they
CA-1 has a report called TMEVSNM in the samples.
I'm hoping an equivalent for the same will be available in TLMS.
If not, it's worth going through the samples library or the docs to find out
what's there.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, September 1st, 2021 at 1:44 AM, Bodra
I did a report. Listed every file on every tape, multiplied the
numbers to a slight overestimate of file size, then summed them for a
total. May need to skip tape data sets no longer on the tape (x days
past expiration, delete flag, etc.).
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 3:14 PM Bodra - Pessoal
What is absurd about a page containing more than on load module? It happens all
the time. Not all modules have or need a 4 KiB alignment.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:27:38 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>OK Gil, you will absolutely love this.
>( I swear I didn't know this until just now :-)
>
>$ cp "//'KIRK.TEST.VBX'" /tmp/test.vbxcp
>cp: FSUMF148 //'KIRK.TEST.VBX': spanned records are not supported
>
>$ cat "//'KIRK.TEST.VBX'" >
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 13:30:17 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>> Thanks, but it doesn't seem to work.� Records that are over 32752 bytes
>> are truncated.
>>
(Was that supposed to be an NBSP?)
>> FMNBB298 10 record(s) copied: 6 truncated: 0 fields truncated
>
>Can you please try with LRECL=X in the
> Thanks, but it doesn't seem to work. Records that are over 32752 bytes
> are truncated.
>
> FMNBB298 10 record(s) copied: 6 truncated: 0 fields truncated
Kirk,
Can you please try with LRECL=X in the JCL definition and also use PAD=ON
in the sysin to pad to the maximum length?
//
OK Gil, you will absolutely love this.
( I swear I didn't know this until just now :-)
$ cp "//'KIRK.TEST.VBX'" /tmp/test.vbxcp
cp: FSUMF148 //'KIRK.TEST.VBX': spanned records are not supported
$ cat "//'KIRK.TEST.VBX'" > /tmp/test.vbxcp
# works. records > 32768 are copied correctly (at least
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:23:25 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>
>You're never wrong, but rarely helpful :-)
>
Have you any constructive criticism?
>On 8/31/21 12:13 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:50:30 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>>...
>> As a last resort, Rexx:
>>
>> Override
Hi,
I need to know how many TBs are being used in our TS3500.
We use CA-TLMS and we have 60 x 3592 cartridges model JC (4TB) and tape drives
are TS1140 (3592-E07).
Is there a CA-TLMS report that tells me how many TBs are in use on each
cartridge?
Or any other source that can give
Thanks, but it doesn't seem to work. Records that are over 32752 bytes
are truncated.
FMNBB298 10 record(s) copied: 6 truncated: 0 fields truncated
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On 8/31/21 11:50 AM, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
Is there an IBM Utility that will do this?
Gil,
You're never wrong, but rarely helpful :-)
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On 8/31/21 12:13 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:50:30 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
Is there an IBM Utility that will do this?
Preferrable with FILEDATA=TEXT processing mode
No. It is a popular name.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
"IBM Mainframe Discussion List" wrote on
08/31/2021 12:58:55 PM:
> From: "Bill Hitefield"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 08/31/2021 02:05 PM
> Subject: Re: RENT binder
For *my* information?
Contents Supervisor uses GETMAIN to obtain
module storage. VSM is quite happy to allocate
partial pages. It has been thus since before my time at
IBM (42 years).
I have to go with what Jor-el says at time
0:43 in this clip:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:50:30 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>> Is there an IBM Utility that will do this?
>> Preferrable with FILEDATA=TEXT processing mode on the output file
>
IDCAAMS REPRO? (I haven't checked its requirements.)
As a last resort, Rexx:
Override stdin to RECFM=U and interpret the
Is this the Dave Cole who wrote "Boney Fingers" - many years ago?
Bill Hitefield
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Jim Mulder
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2021 12:56 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: RENT binder option
>
> This is
This is not the XDC Dave Cole. Dave Cole the musician
was an MVS developer who worked on TSO/E (and was
the developer of the PRINTDS command) and MVS/APPC.
We did not discuss diagnostic techniques, but we did create
a design that would have allowed the systems in a sysplex
to safely share
Never mind:
4. Data sets with spanned record lengths are not allowed.
Grrr. VBS is the red-headed stepchild of DFSMS.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2021 9:49 AM
To:
> Is there an IBM Utility that will do this?
> Preferrable with FILEDATA=TEXT processing mode on the output file
Kirk,
If your shop has IBM File-Manager then you can use the following JCL
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=FILEMGR
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//DDIN DD DISP=SHR,DSN=Your.MVS.LRECLX.Dataset
Did you try from within the z/FS?
Doug Fuerst
d...@bkassociates.net
-- Original Message --
From: "Kirk Wolf"
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 31-Aug-21 12:30:23
Subject: Copy RECFM=VBS/LRECL=X to zFS?
Is there an IBM Utility that will do this?
Preferrable with FILEDATA=TEXT
Did you try OPUT?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2021 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Copy RECFM=VBS/LRECL=X to zFS?
Is there an IBM Utility that will do
Am 31.08.2021 um 18:30 schrieb Kirk Wolf:
Is there an IBM Utility that will do this?
Preferrable with FILEDATA=TEXT processing mode on the output file
(adding newlines at record boundaries).
Trying IEBGENER and ICEGENER both result inￜ 013-A8
I think the IBM Sort should do this part.
Is there an IBM Utility that will do this?
Preferrable with FILEDATA=TEXT processing mode on the output file
(adding newlines at record boundaries).
Trying IEBGENER and ICEGENER both result in 013-A8
--
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
>> Is it still valid requirement or it was relieved?
Unique sysids are no longer required. SCRT has supported duplicate
z/OS sysids on different LPARs since version 24.10 (circa 2016).
Regards,
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
On 8/31/2021 11:35 AM, Jim Mulder wrote:
Yes, I know the lines from that show from having
played in the orchestra for it here:
https://countyplayers.org/icpdb/shows/0502.html
I expect you chatted about diagnostic techniques with Dave during breaks
in rehearsal...
O-O
\_/
FWIW, REFRPROT accomplishes two things:
use of key 0 storage for reentrant modules whether from an authorized
concatenation or not (aside from the cases for which key 0 storage is not
used when it is RENT even from an authorized concatenation, such as within
TSO TEST when the requestor is not
Hence, the OS allocates whole - not partial - 4K pages to a load module
(LMOD)
...
In other words, pages are either fully allocated/occupied to or by a
REFR LMOD's code or they are not occupied by a REFR LMOD's code at all.
This logic is flawed and the conclusions are untrue.
This relates to
Compatibility is a concern. That is why the default will not change. It is
not only a question of "a few bytes".
There are programs that break if everything gets rounded to page
multiples.
Maybe those programs are wrong and should be fixed. But that is not our
call.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core
IEASYMU2 requires updates access to FACILITY class entity
IEASYMUP.symname.
You should not use IEASYMU2 unless this is a temporary update that you do
not want to persist for the next IPL.
I'd say that there is no such thing as "my system symbols". Anything
beyond the system symbols provided
I'm looking for reference manual describing .WS file parameters.
Most of them is obvious, but some are not and I it seems undocumented.
I browsed all available books searching some keyword - no entry.
Examples:
SessFlags
SoundsOn (that is self-explanatory)
RuleLinePos
Any clue?
--
Radoslaw
33 matches
Mail list logo
