On an lpar with 25g of memory we run the COBOL 6.2 compiles with a region of
512M.
This is from a program that has well over 25,000 lines of code. Had OPT(0) set
plus lots of debug stuff turned on.
IEF373I STEP/COB6/START 2022109.0219
IEF032I STEP/COB6
Ah, thank you! I got to the point where I thought I was pretty comfortable
with SQL, but clearly I've been away longer than I realized.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* Error saving file. Format drive now (Y/y)? */
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Except when they don't:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.3.0?topic=functions-ffs-find-first-set-bit
-in-integer
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 3:35 PM
To:
Some IBM documentation gives bit numbers 0-7 and other documentation gives the
masks for those bits: bit 0 is mask 80, bit 1 is mask 40 ... bit 7 is mask 01.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
No, IBM numbers bits from the left. In an 8-bit field, bit 0 corresponds to a
mask of '80'x and bit 7 to a maskm of '01'x.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf
It will be interesting to see what IBM responds to your ticket. Please share
if you can when it is closed.
I wonder if using the pre-processor vs the co-processor for the CICS compile
would affect the total time, if you are able to set up JCL to allow that. We
don't use the co-processor here
You're right of course. Other systems count bits the other direction. You
can make an argument for either approach.
- 0 as the high bit corresponds to how we generally represent binary
integers, with the high order bit on the left.
- 0 as the low bit gives you consistency across 8, 16, 32 and 64
If the results in col1, col2 and col3 may be different for the same
"something" condition
in tables table1 thru table3, my solution is not correct.
In this case, you need some sort of "select from table1 ... union all ...
select from table2 where not exists (result from table1)" etc. etc.
But
Hi Peter,
I agree that IBM has warned of significantly higher CPU and memory
requirements, and we've seen increases, but to go from .3 CPU seconds to over
500 - a 1500 fold increase seems more than a bit excessive to me.
We're using the CICS coprocessor.
Rex
-Original Message-
On Apr 18, 2022, at 12:48 PM, Tom Longfellow
<03e29b607131-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> I have been wandering in the wilderness of unix syslogs under z/OS and have
> been unable to find a definitive answer to the following question.
>
> Does z/OS SYSLOGD daemon support TCP
select col1, col2, col3, min (wherefound)
from (select col1, col2, col3, 'source 1' as wherefound
from table1
where something
union ALL
select col1, col2, col3, 'source 2' as wherefound
from table2
where something
union ALL
My reading of Principals of Operation indicates register
documentation has bit 0 as the high order bit, not lower order bit.
Michael
At 11:20 AM 4/18/2022, Charles Mills wrote:
Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX).
So is my interpretation correct?
In my research for a client we saw dramatically increased compile times,
both CPU and elapsed, for COBOL 6.2 as opposed to 4.2. It was particularly
dramatic for larger programs, and with OPT(1) and OPT(2).
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Memory usage is much higher in the COBOL V5/6.x versions than in any earlier
version. IBM tells you this explicitly in all its migration advice that I have
seen. In our shop we use the max locally allowed memory per programmer batch
job (IEFUTL00 limit) for every compile step, 640M.
IBM also
Hi list,
Should I be concerned about the amount of resources Cobol 6.3 is occasionally
using as compared to 4.2? I have one particular example that was brought to
our attention due to the fact that we ran out of page space in our small shop.
I finally got it to compile after tripling my page
Thanks but it is pretty clear that the bits are X'80' and so forth.
The client was seeing 1, 2 and 3 because they were looking at the wrong byte
(SMF30MES).
Displaying the correct byte they are seeing 128's, which is good -- says audit
is on but no usage.
Charles
-Original Message-
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 12:20, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX).
I think you were right the first time.
Tony H.
> So is my interpretation correct?
>
> SMF30_USERKEYCSAUSAGE is x'02'?
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
I should have mentioned that this is a cursor.
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:32:11 -0400 Bob Bridges wrote:
:>Are col1, col2 and col3 going to be identical in all three tables? You
:>don't need to know which table they came from?
:>
:>Offhand it seems to me you want a subquery, something like this:
Are col1, col2 and col3 going to be identical in all three tables? You
don't need to know which table they came from?
Offhand it seems to me you want a subquery, something like this:
Select first col1 col2 col3, src
From (
select col1, col2 col3, 'source 1'
from table1
where
I have been wandering in the wilderness of unix syslogs under z/OS and have
been unable to find a definitive answer to the following question.
Does z/OS SYSLOGD daemon support TCP protocol connections for incoming messages
from other hosts??
--
Here are the gory details.
1. A DS8884 -
Seems that I have been knocked off of the DB2-L listserv.
I am doing a union of three queries where it is possible that the critical
columns are in more than one of the queries.
For example:
select col1, col2 col3, 'source 1'
from table1
Or " I bought a z114, now what? " Share presentation?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:55 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> If he gets it up, might IBM ask him to write up the experience for a redbook?
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
MXG decodes these raxflags:
SMF30_RAXFLAGS='AUDIT*USERKEY*CSA*FLAGS'
SMF30_RAXFLAG0='RAX0*USERKEY*COMMON*AUDIT*ENABLED?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG1='RAX1*USERKEY*COMMON*AUDIT*USAGE?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG2='RAX2*USERKEY*CADS*USAGE?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG3='RAX3*USERKEY*CHANGE*KEY*USAGE?'
Thanks.
The customer is reporting 1's, 2's and 3's, so there must be some program logic
confusion.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dave Jousma
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 9:32 AM
To:
MXG decodes as:
SMF30_RAXFLAGS='AUDIT*USERKEY*CSA*FLAGS'
SMF30_RAXFLAG0='RAX0*USERKEY*COMMON*AUDIT*ENABLED?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG1='RAX1*USERKEY*COMMON*AUDIT*USAGE?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG2='RAX2*USERKEY*CADS*USAGE?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG3='RAX3*USERKEY*CHANGE*KEY*USAGE?'
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:32:53 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having
>trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I.
>
>The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the
>SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR
Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX).
So is my interpretation correct?
SMF30_USERKEYCSAUSAGE is x'02'?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, April
We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having
trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I.
The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the
SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as
Bit 0, Bit 1, etc.
On 4/18/22 12:08 AM, David Crayford wrote:
Hardware geeks like to buy hardware. It's a bit like asking me why I
want to own a Sinclair Spectrum or a BBC Micro when I can run ZX
Spectrum emulator in a browser or install RetroPie on one of my
Raspberry Pi's! Emulation is just not the same
>>5. A tape drive and controller
>
>Not required. Are you thinking of initial startup/OS installation? On this
>vintage
>machine there should be non-tape IPL (startup/“bootstrap”) options, notably
>HMC DVD.
>Such options were standard well before the z114. Assuming Enzo gets a working
>HMC
Yes, Linux should run on it.
"DEASD" is a typo and should be DASD.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Joe
Monk [joemon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April
Now there's an antique!
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2022
I believe that the grammar is corrrect, but the duplication is a typo. Yes, I
meant to include z/OS. I did not know whther OCO applied to z/TPF.
The {{dubious}} template was at the end of a string of footnotes, so I may have
misinterpreted its scope.
The logic manuals that I cited are not for
If he gets it up, might IBM ask him to write up the experience for a redbook?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Timothy Sipples [sipp...@sg.ibm.com]
Sent:
I had forgotten when the DVD option was available.
You can run z/OS from the HMC, if you're a masochist; I'm not sure about other
systems. I would consider OSAA-ICC to be a cluster controller.
As a point of curiosity, what are his licensing options if he decides to look
at z/OS or z/VM?
--
On 16/4/22 06:58, Grant Taylor wrote:
Hi,
I am a US high school student who is seriously considering acquiring
a z114 mainframe.
I hope that I don't come off too wrong when I ask, but why do you want
a z114? -- I completely get wanting a mainframe. -- But why a z114?
Hardware geeks
Shmuel Metz wrote:
>There are several issues that you will need to deal with in order to
>get a running system.
>[]
>2. Licensed internal code for the CEC, which may or may not
>need an upgrade
I’d say this part doesn’t matter. Whatever level(s) of LIC firmware are on the
machine are
37 matches
Mail list logo
