Same here, I had to restart in March, and still have not heard anything.
Brian
On Wed, 11 May 2022 18:44:44 -0400, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>I’m still waiting on processing the paperwork. Somehow it get’s started and
>lost and they ask me to start over again
>
>Matt Hogstrom
>m...@hogstrom.org
>
LOL, this is one of those sure-fire and then throw gasoline on ibm-main threads
of the class:
"Here are some historical things about MVS that you probably didn't know"
Keep um, coming :-)
-- Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
-
I remember that dataset. When I first started, one of my jobs was to
run a program someone had written that read every record looking for a
dataset match, and then spit out the password. That was for folks who
forgot their dataset password of course. The program took maybe 10
minutes to run,
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Michael Oujesky
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 3:30 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Potential Resource Savings Techniques
>
> Model DSCB no longer required for SMS managed.
Don't I
I’m still waiting on processing the paperwork. Somehow it get’s started and
lost and they ask me to start over again
Matt Hogstrom
m...@hogstrom.org
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.” -
Hanlon’s Razor
> On May 11, 2022, at 5:51 PM, Dean Kent wrote:
Model DSCB no longer required for SMS managed.
Michael
At 04:59 PM 5/11/2022, Gibney, Dave wrote:
Creation of new GDSs also needed a model DSCB.
Well before I started working here (41 years
come August), the Sysprogs of the time wrote
PGM=OPENCLSE. Which scanned the TIOT for
=C'DD', op
Including when password had nothing to do with authentication and system
access. The PASSWORD file (yes, single level dataset name) was used to
implement PASSWORD protection for specific datasets.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Charles Mills
>
Reg Harbeck (a name many of you should recognize) and I are putting together
a presentation on the above subject. We would appreciate any material that
anyone thought could be included. (I guess I should get all lawyerly here
and say if you send it to us you grant us permission to use it.)
Note th
Has anyone received their USB license key for the Learner's Edition product?
Just curious, as I was told around the 1st of April that it would be sent
'soon', and I have yet to get any communication that it was actually sent.
Long ago, like MVT and the 1st MVS days, application programmers would
allocate (IEFBR14, or just typos in JCL) datasets that were never opened. They
lacked an EOF mark. These would use space and cause problems with various
automated or manual clean-up efforts. And, residual data was accessib
Great technique. What utility or JCL is being used, if the dataset is not
opened then RLSE does not happen.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 5:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Po
I think your method works well, unless the files are using 0 TRKS or CYLS, if
that is the case the space is usually not released.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
PINION, RICHARD W.
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 5:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sub
Even better yet, code SPACE=(CYL,(0,500),RLSE)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 5:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Potential Resource Savings Techniques
[External Email. Exercise
Using you favorite DASD management software, DF/HSM or FDRABR, you can release
free space
at will. We cobbled together a program that releases space, without updating
the last use date.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022
David,
Here's another solution to that scenario. We have several datasets that
historically got allocated like you show here on a nightly basis. The jobs
would either populate the datasets or not even open them. I had the developer
change the JCL to allocate them with SPACE(CYL(1,500),RLSE).
My 2nd apology. The main reason for using this IDCAMS method is to reduce
wasted disk space for empty files. Sometimes empty files are
Updated with data after they are created and sometimes they just remain empty.
One user created a few hundred of these each month with
SPACE=(CYL,(500,200),RL
Most of the list e-mails come from ibm-main@
This one is from
Peter Enrico • peter.enr...@epstrategies.com
about an EPS webinar.
I'm just wondering: does this happen often?
Roops
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive ac
And would also be for IEFBR14.
At 03:12 PM 5/11/2022, Michael Oujesky wrote:
SDB is done in two phases - allocation and open. so, here, SDB is active.
michael
At 02:36 PM 5/11/2022, wrote:
I apologize to all. The Correct JCL is below. It must use INFILE
of DD DUMMY.
IDCAMS TO ALLOCATE
On Wed, 11 May 2022 15:12:19 -0500, Michael Oujesky wrote:
>SDB is done in two phases - allocation and open. so, here, SDB is active.
>
If SDB operates at allocation (which I doubt) there's no point in its operating
at OPEN because no data set will come to OPEN with BLLKSIZE=0.
--
gil
---
On Wed, 11 May 2022 15:36:01 -0400, wrote:
>I apologize to all. The Correct JCL is below. It must use INFILE of DD DUMMY.
>
How do IEFBR14, IEBGENER, and IDCAMS compare in behavior and performance?
I'd expect:
IEFBR14 fails to RLSE.
IEBGENER is simplest to code for a single data set.
IDCAMS has
SDB is done in two phases - allocation and open. so, here, SDB is active.
michael
At 02:36 PM 5/11/2022, wrote:
I apologize to all. The Correct JCL is below. It must use INFILE
of DD DUMMY.
IDCAMS TO ALLOCATE EMPTY FILE VS USING IEFBR14 AS BR14 DOES NOT USE
SDB or RLSE SPACE
//STEP010
I apologize to all. The Correct JCL is below. It must use INFILE of DD DUMMY.
IDCAMS TO ALLOCATE EMPTY FILE VS USING IEFBR14 AS BR14 DOES NOT USE SDB or RLSE
SPACE
//STEP010 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//DD1 DD DUMMY CAN USE DD DUMMY OR DD * WITH NO DATA
//DD2 DD DSN=GRT.GIOIDXM.TEST.BLK
If your DATACLAS specifies a default DSORG (which can be overridden by JCL), an
unopened, NEW allocation will have a valid EOF. For at least the last 25 years.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of David Spiegel
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 10:36 AM
Ah! I interpreted the question of "how to code a program to do a programmatic
query" and SMFRTEST is the answer to that.
If the question is "how would a human do an interactive query?" then yes, the
answer is D SMF,O and learning to parse the output (as a human) is a learning
experience of its
Hi Dave,
I looked at my Data Class definitions and saw nothing related to writing
an EOF.
Maybe you have an Exit or Storage Management product (e.g. CA Disk,
Mainview SRM).
Regards,
David
On 2022-05-11 13:27, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I may be mistaken about the RLSE or perhaps it is a function of
On Wed, 11 May 2022 16:18:41 +, A T & T Management
wrote:
> Peter,
> How would one go about doing a query of SMF if it is recording that record
>number?
>
>Thank you,Scott
>
>On Wednesday, May 11, 2022, 11:50:22 AM EDT, Peter Relson
> wrote:
>
> Do keep in mind that many SMF rec
I may be mistaken about the RLSE or perhaps it is a function of my default
DATACLAS. I know the EOF is there.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of David Spiegel
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 10:23 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Po
So I see... Well thank you Charles! Don't have a current manual for SMF by
that will soon change.
Scott
On Wednesday, May 11, 2022, 01:13:07 PM EDT, Charles Mills
wrote:
I am not Peter LOL but check out SMFRTEST in the SMF manual.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Main
Hi Dave,
I tested it. Your hypothesis is false (i.e. RLSE is not done.)
Regards,
David
On 2022-05-11 13:12, Gibney, Dave wrote:
If SMS-managed and DSORG known, an unopened new allocation will have an EOF set
and RLSE will be process.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
I am not Peter LOL but check out SMFRTEST in the SMF manual.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of A T & T Management
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 9:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Producing throwaw
If SMS-managed and DSORG known, an unopened new allocation will have an EOF set
and RLSE will be process.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of David Spiegel
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 9:20 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Potentia
Are you saying that IDCAMS opens files that are not referenced by a command in
SYSIN?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
[ming...@prodigy.net]
Sent: Wedn
As of z/OS 2.3 if your JES2 is at a z22 level there is new function called
'JES2 resiliency - privilege support'. It is designed to reserve control blocks
- including BERTs, so that it is possible for a user to access the system in
situations where some JES2 resources are exhausted. The user can
Hi Paul,
Allocation does allocation and nothing but allocation.
It does not write anything at all.
Regards,
David
On 2022-05-11 12:17, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2022 15:53:20 +, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
Only if your SYSIN is not DUMMY. When SYSIN for IDCAMS is DUMMY it does
Peter,
How would one go about doing a query of SMF if it is recording that record
number?
Thank you,Scott
On Wednesday, May 11, 2022, 11:50:22 AM EDT, Peter Relson
wrote:
Do keep in mind that many SMF record producers query SMF to see if SMF is
being told to record their record
On Wed, 11 May 2022 15:53:20 +, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>Only if your SYSIN is not DUMMY. When SYSIN for IDCAMS is DUMMY it does (and
>can do) nothing at all, rather more expensively in CPU time than IEFBR14, but
>still nothing by comparison.
>
>Only if you are allocating and using REPR
That will only happen if you run a REPRO within the IDCAMS execution.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
https://rsclweb.com
‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sent: 11 May 2022 16:46
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSER
Hi David,
I tested this and since there is no I/O to the Dataset, space is not
released.
Again, there might be an Exit on your system or a Storage Management
product.
Your theory (that IDCAMS does Open and Close etc.) is false (when SYSIN
is DUMMY).
Prove me wrong.
Regards,
David
On 2022-0
Only if your SYSIN is not DUMMY. When SYSIN for IDCAMS is DUMMY it does (and
can do) nothing at all, rather more expensively in CPU time than IEFBR14, but
still nothing by comparison.
Only if you are allocating and using REPRO from a DUMMY to a new sequential
file or an actual DEFINE for a VSA
Do keep in mind that many SMF record producers query SMF to see if SMF is being
told to record their record and will bypass creating the record and calling SMF
if SMF is not recording it. No exit will get control if the producer decides
not to produce.
I have no idea what CICS does.
Peter Rels
Thanks for your response.
IDCAMS does an open and close on the new file and writes zero records, so if
RLSE is coded with the SPACE for output file(s) then the unused trks or cyls
Are released. Secondary space will be used if needed when data is created in
the file later.
-Original Message
HI David,
I do not understand this at all.
How does any program differ from IEFBR14 (with respect to
allocation/freeing unused disk space by DD Statement)?
Maybe your shop has an Exit or add-on product which does Storage Management?
David
On 2022-05-11 01:53, wrote:
5. Consider changi
On Wed, 11 May 2022 04:06:40 +, kekronbekron wrote:
>...
>Could you help me understand the difference between accessed, modified, and
>changed... times.
>
Glenn supplies some examples below. Additionally:
o Read alters thee accessed time.
o Write alters the modified tiime.
o Rename alters
I'm not sure that wiki would accept anything behind a membership wall as
published. Does SHARE offer a way for a non-member to view an individual
session? If so, O346 might do the trick, especially as it is a secondary
source. Thanks.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
_
44 matches
Mail list logo