Hello,
Can IBM 3590 tape drive be online at the same time with both LPARs?
If there is an LPAR that currently brought the *all drives* online, another
LPAR will issue an IEE791I.
IEE791I cuu VARY REJECTED - ASSIGNED TO ANOTHER SYSTEM
I understand that both LPARs cannot use tape drives at
Great! Hopefully IBM and others can help out with the other things
needed. We need more young mainframers. I've never been one, I started
when I was already old and then got even older.
On 5/25/2022 7:05 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
Proud new owner!
Proud new owner!
https://www.reddit.com/r/homelab/comments/uxsbef/my_new_z114/
— — — — —
Timothy Sipples
Senior Architect
Digital Assets, Industry Solutions, and Cyber Security
IBM zSystems and LinuxONE
sipp...@sg.ibm.com
--
Food for thought:
* when splitting out CICS 110, consider splitting out 110.1.3
(transaction detail) and all other. Depending on how you process the
transaction detail, you might also want to separate out the 110.1.1
dictionary records.
* Also consider splitting out TYPE74 from the
On Wed, May 25, 2022, at 10:30 AM, Dustin Hayes wrote:
>
> What Michael is trying to tell you is that your confusing "sFTP" and "FTPs",
> these are two very different protocols which have nothing to do with each
> other (think beta vs vhs).
>
> sFTP is "ftp tunneled though the SSH interface"
On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:46:20 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote:
>I have learned more about SYSTEM Logstreams that I ever wanted to know.
>
>
>
>I have friend that produces BILLIONS of SMF/Logstream records per month,
>
>And has RETPD of 120 (ten years' worth). And each STAGE file is migrated
>
>Of
Hi, I'm not familiar with QUERYSET, but there is a single thread that processes
certain commands (QUERY, LIST, etc), so it's possible that the QUERY was queued
up behind one or more other commands that took longer to run.
--
I have learned more about SYSTEM Logstreams that I ever wanted to know.
I have friend that produces BILLIONS of SMF/Logstream records per month,
And has RETPD of 120 (ten years' worth). And each STAGE file is migrated
Of within 24 hours.
I am going to split this mess into
Terri,
Thanks for something new to consider going forward.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Shaffer, Terri
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 10:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OSMF Portable Software Instance - Deployment Question
Lloyd/Dustin,
>
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. You are both right. I totally understand
the difference ... and I was still criss-crossing them.
What I am trying to do is FTPS - native ftp with AT-TLS involved to handle
the SSL/TLS security stuff. And every one of my tests has been wrong
Hi Mark,
The option prevents all the violations when you 's' select the entire job. It
won't help when you
select the job with ? and then select individual SYSOUTs. For the latter, it is
WAD.
Regards, Bob
Robert S. Hansel35 years of RACF Experience
Lead RACF Specialist
RSH
Mark
When the user issues a browse request for the entire job, they may not be aware
of the constituent output DDs and any security violations encountered may be
out of their initial control (or expectation). It is not unreasonable in this
case to tolerate the violations without penalty.
The
Thanks for the update - yes I did forget the custom parameter. It may work for
what I need. When I select the complete report it comes back as unauthorized.
If I expand the report with a ? and select a report it still get the violation
and after several attempt it suspend the ID.
Is there
Vanguard Integrity Professionals - External - Public
What Michael is trying to tell you is that your confusing "sFTP" and "FTPs",
these are two very different protocols which have nothing to do with each other
(think beta vs vhs).
sFTP is "ftp tunneled though the SSH interface" and runs on
You are misusing things here. SFTP does not equal FTPS.
SFTP is overlaid onshore which is using an encrypted interface itself. FTPS is
what the FTP server can support.
WinSCP can do both but not FTPS on port 22.
Lloyd
Sent from AT Yahoo Mail for iPad
On Wednesday, May 25, 2022, 11:20 AM,
I don’t think you can use PAGENT for port 22 (not 100% sure on that). If
using port 22 configure SSHD.
Did you set the trace parm in PAGENT to 255? You will get much more info
in SYSLOG by doing that.
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:05 AM Bob wrote:
> That's one I have changed back and forth 21
That's one I have changed back and forth 21 ... 22 ... 21 .. 22 ... 21 &22.
The config I started with had 21 in it, but the WinSCP references 22 so I have
been trying both ... without success. I changed it back to 21 now. Still fails.
I just added an ftp configuration parameter of FTPLOGGING
That's one I have changed back and forth 21 ... 22 ... 21 .. 22 ... 21
&22. The config I started with had 21 in it, but the WinSCP references 22
so I have been trying both ... without success. I changed it back to 21
now. Still fails.
I just added an ftp configuration parameter of FTPLOGGING
So what I do, is I have 3 different SSASYS1, SSAOMVS and SSASMPE HLQ defined in
my ACS routines.
And they are related to the catalogs were the end result name will live.
Its my circumvention to duplicates and the nuisances of installs.
Ms Terri E Shaffer
Senior Systems Engineer,
z/OS Support:
I can SSH into z/OS USS but I don’t use pagent for port 22. You should
configure SSHD for that. Remove port 22 from PAGENT.
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 8:46 AM Bob wrote:
> I am struggling to get AT-TLS and FTP working on my new z/OS 2.5 system and
> I don’t know why. I’m sure I am
>
> missing
Set your trace to 255 in the policy, refresh PAGENT and check the Syslog.
I suspect a ciphersuite issue.
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 8:46 AM Bob wrote:
> I am struggling to get AT-TLS and FTP working on my new z/OS 2.5 system and
> I don’t know why. I’m sure I am
>
> missing something very simple,
would an SSL trace help here ?
not the same 'type' of connection, I had an issue with inbound
connections to CICS and DB2 that was self inflicted, the AT-TLS add on
required I failed to order and the connections were using some default,
I was able to find this by performing an SSL trace and
I am struggling to get AT-TLS and FTP working on my new z/OS 2.5 system and
I don’t know why. I’m sure I am
missing something very simple, but I have spent a lot of time over the last
few weeks trying to figure it out
and I cannot. Note that ftp without encryption does work and I have
nothing
Mark,
I'm surprised it didn't work. Did you code a CUSTOM(proplist) parameter in
_all_ your GROUP statements that points to the PROPLIST NAME(proplist)
statement with the PROPERTY parameter? And did you refresh the ISFPARMS in all
the SDSF servers?
Regards, Bob
Robert S. Hansel
I've had rexx exec's which took the CTRACE output from a couple of
components, to extract data I was interested in.
I used IPCS view, and ISPF macros in rexx to do the work
Typical formatting would be to exclude lines, and replace lines with a
subset of each CTRACE output.
On Tue, 24 May 2022 at
25 matches
Mail list logo
