To help a person who has COBOL and C language experience learn to write
assembler, I would like them to learn from the start both reentrant and
baseless coding techniques. Is there training available that assumes the
instruction set available on the z12 is the starting point and that teaches
>> I want to format a STCK/TOD with microseconds, but I found only the method
>> to format it with hundredths of a second:
Stefan,
Here is a brief description of how to get the microseconds portion from TOD
using DFSORT. Since you haven’t provided the complete DFSORT cards, I assumed
that you
There’s this joke in which a three-year-old little girl comes to her father
holding a floppy disk in her hand. She says: “Daddy, Daddy, somebody 3D-printed
the save icon.”
>From the last paragraph of Bob's article.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I see
https://www-40.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zOSV2R3sc236878/$file/icea100_v2r3.pdf
"xx" -- hundredths -- is all you have. I don't see a "TC5" that would give you
hhmmssxx.
TOD clock conversion is complex enough that I suspect you cannot do it yourself
with
Really interesting, at least for me. Apparently all sorts of floppies are
still in use, and this one business is the last one selling them.
https://eyeondesign.aiga.org/we-spoke-with-the-last-person-standing-in-the-floppy-disk-business/
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
Thanks, I've just tested your suggestion:
TT:TT:TT.TT -> 14:53:21.36
TT:TT:TT.TT -> 00:00:14.532136
It behaves like in the manual described:
Format Code | Length | Description
TC4 |8 bytes | TOD time interpreted as Z'hhmmssxx'
and
"The implied length of the edited
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 19:31:36 +0200, Peter Sylvester wrote:
>I "like" this one:
>
>https://www.ibm.com/docs/pt-br/zos/2.3.0?topic=messages-fsumf061
>
Where I read:
User response
Format this man page on a system that supports nroff or troff. Then
return
the formatted man page
I was under the impression that if PAGENT isn't running, then no new
connections can start.
On 9/16/2022 10:44 AM, Jantje. wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:03:23 -0500, Matthew Stitt
wrote:
Here are my AUTOLOG statements from the TCP/IP profile:
AUTOLOG 5
PAGENT ; AT-TLS
What happens if you change TT:TT:TT.TT to TT:TT:TT.TTT?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Stefan Lezzi
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: dfsort - microseconds
I "like" this one:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/pt-br/zos/2.3.0?topic=messages-fsumf061
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
IMHO the prerequisite questions are "where is the STCK value now and where do
you want the formatted value to end up?"
I read the OP's question as implying that the answer to "now?" is "in the
records of some file" and the answer to "end up?" is "in the records of a file
or SYSOUT." In that
Hi Tom,
Yes, I know, if I would parse the IMS log records with assembler. But assembler
is not my strongest skill, and, sadly, not very much loved by company
management nowadays.
It's about my, already coded and working, dfsort solution to parse some fields
of the Mainview/IMS record x'FA'
Better to use:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=routine-description
Tom Harper
Phoenix Software International
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 16, 2022, at 12:28 PM, Stefan Lezzi
> <04561630d35b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> What do I miss?
>
> I want
Hi all!
What do I miss?
I want to format a STCK/TOD with microseconds, but I found only the method to
format it with hundredths of a second:
C'"TRNSTCK":"',393,8,DC1,EDIT=(-TT-TT),C'T',
393,8,TC4,EDIT=(TT:TT:TT.TT),C'+00:00',C'",',
And I know how to
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 15:04:06 +, Farley, Peter wrote:
>More appropriately, since my ALLOC of SYSEXEC to a PATH specified
>FILETYPE(TEXT), it seems to me that should signal to the system (whoever
>creates and opens the SYSEXEC DCB) that the data in that file are
>presumptively
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:03:23 -0500, Matthew Stitt
wrote:
>Here are my AUTOLOG statements from the TCP/IP profile:
>
>AUTOLOG 5
> PAGENT ; AT-TLS Policy server
> GPMSERVE DELAYSTART TTLS ; RMF Server
> ...
More appropriately, since my ALLOC of SYSEXEC to a PATH specified
FILETYPE(TEXT), it seems to me that should signal to the system (whoever
creates and opens the SYSEXEC DCB) that the data in that file are presumptively
RECFM=V,LRECL=(some reasonable maximum like 4096).
Hindsight is always
Looks like that section of the pub was removed from the 2.4 and 2.5 versions of
the pubs so I'm unclear on what happens in 2.4 or 2.5 for man pages.
Anyone have any clue?
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
“Worry more about your character
The default console definition used by z/OSMF is the default value of the
OPERPARM segment in SAF. For instance, ROUTCODE would default to NONE. z/OSMF
has a sample job
The sample, which can be found in 'sys1.samplib(IZUGCSEC)', actually has sample
statements that are commented out. So
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.3.0?topic=sys1parmlib-ephwp00-bookmanager-topic-extraction
Last version for topic is 2.3.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:53 AM Michael Babcock wrote:
>
> I was thinking that EPH datasets are no longer shipped with z/OS. They are
> not on my z/OS 2.4 system.
>
> On
Here are my AUTOLOG statements from the TCP/IP profile:
AUTOLOG 5
PAGENT ; AT-TLS Policy server
GPMSERVE DELAYSTART TTLS ; RMF Server
TSOFRONT DELAYSTART TTLS ; TSO Startup
TN3270E
Thank you for looking into this.
What you have been told is not what is happening out here on the front lines.
We first created our z/OS Operating System Consoles support definitions without
OPERPARM support or RACF OPERPARM segments. I do not have ready access to add
OPERPARM segments to
Esteemed Listers,
As we are required to support TLSv1.2 for our TN3270 sessions, we are now
implementing AT-TLS. Using the 'IBM Personal Communications and IBM z/OS TTLS
Enablement' Redpaper, I have the configuration of the PAGENT, TCPIP and TELNET
regions going. Remains to decide what is the
I was thinking that EPH datasets are no longer shipped with z/OS. They are
not on my z/OS 2.4 system.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 6:24 AM Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
> The issue isn't with MANPATH - when you issue the command: man -k .
>
> It reports a summary of 'all available' man pages.
>
> And when
The issue isn't with MANPATH - when you issue the command: man -k .
It reports a summary of 'all available' man pages.
And when you issue: man -k xxx
It will report 'all' the man pages that have xxx
The OMVS man command does *not* search the MANPATH but the information in the
EPH.SEPHTAB
25 matches
Mail list logo
