Oops, I missed read your question. Just enter the command as "tso cmd"
ITschak
בתאריך יום ו׳, 5 במאי 2023 ב-20:52 מאת Mark Jacobs <
0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>:
> Before I have to reinvent the command again, I forgot to take a copy from
> $previousjob, does anyone have a rexx
Sorry, I must have been looking at CP437.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2023 8:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Z/OS port of Regina
On Fri, 5 May 2023 23:53:52 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I don't recall the details, but AA is '¬' on, e.g., CP852 and AC is '¬' on,
>e.g., CP850.
I see AA in both. Look like Windows box drawing code pages. ("not"
is different from "upper right corner".)
--
gil
I don't recall the details, but AA is '¬' on, e.g., CP852 and AC is '¬' on,
e.g., CP850.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2023 7:22 PM
To:
The date on the COBOL program is 2005.
Sent from Proton Mail mobile
Original Message
On May 5, 2023, 7:06 PM, Farley, Peter wrote:
> Took me a while to find it, but I *think* this is my re-implementation for
> TIOT access in Rexx when SWA=ABOVE (I know I copied this technique
On Fri, 5 May 2023 22:25:09 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>What code page are you using? What release of Regina? In some code pages Not
>is 'AA'X, in others 'AC'X. In Unicode it's U+00AC ('C2AC'X in UTF-8).
>
533 $ locale
LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8"
trace R; parse version .
1 *-* parse
Took me a while to find it, but I *think* this is my re-implementation for TIOT
access in Rexx when SWA=ABOVE (I know I copied this technique from another
author whose name I did not save, so my apologies to that author - if you are
still reading this list, please take credit where it is due).
Not quite what I meant.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, May 5th, 2023 at 4:45 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
> Here you go:
>
>
What code page are you using? What release of Regina? In some code pages Not is
'AA'X, in others 'AC'X. In Unicode it's U+00AC ('C2AC'X in UTF-8).
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
Well, some mainframe compilers require a different code page for
special characters they require, so anybody using the compiler might
need a REXXPLI or REXXAPL version.
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 12:47 PM Paul Gilmartin
<042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 May 2023
That logic is fine for SWA below the line, but I don't think many shops still
run that way, at least not the larger ones.
ISTR there was at one time a published Rexx implementation of the SWA-above
logic, but I can't put my finger on it just yet. That logic (if found) should
be transferable
How old is it? Does anybody still run with SWA below the line?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
rpinion865 <042a019916dd-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2023 2:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: COBOL to
Here you go:
*** TOP OF DATA *
'TIME'
*BOTTOM OF DATA
Fully tested. Ur welcome.
sas
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 1:52 PM Mark Jacobs <
0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Before I have to reinvent the command again, I
And how are you copying it from USS to an MVS dataset?
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 4:34 AM Michael Babcock
wrote:
> Before trying to add it to RACF use the RACDCERT CHECKCERT command. Off
> the top of my head, I think it’s RACDCERT CHECKCERT(‘dataset-name’). I
> always use that before adding a
Mark,
Call axr mid 'cmd text '
ITschak
בתאריך יום ו׳, 5 במאי 2023 ב-20:52 מאת Mark Jacobs <
0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>:
> Before I have to reinvent the command again, I forgot to take a copy from
> $previousjob, does anyone have a rexx exec in their system rexx library
>
Neale Ferguson write, in part:
>Is it possible to declare a "weak" symbol with XLC?
Which XL C? Looking at the compiler ref for 2.4.1, it includes
#pragma weak (C only)
but that doesn't mean you're using that version.
--
For
I don't know if this program is of any use to the original poster. But, I came
across the source this afternoon. It would seem if you can read the JFCB, maybe
you could update it?
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION.
PROGRAM-ID. COBJFCB.
INSTALLATION.
AUTHOR. KEVIN.
DATE-WRITTEN. 11/07/2005.
ENVIRONMENT
Before I have to reinvent the command again, I forgot to take a copy from
$previousjob, does anyone have a rexx exec in their system rexx library that
executes a TSO command from a system rexx address space?
Mark Jacobs
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted
On Fri, 5 May 2023 12:12:46 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
>On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 7:40 PM David Crayford wrote:
>
>> ... Oh well, that’s life dealing with the major suckage that is EBCDIC!
>>
>You could create a patch for the most common EBCDIC code page
>(US.-ENG), then modify and test for
A previous poster wrote:
> siis% is number of instructions that suffered SIIS in a given period
But I wonder about this. The percentage in "SIIS percentage" technically isn't
a percentage of instructions, but rather percentage regarding the source of L1
i-cache directory writes. Looking at how
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 7:40 PM David Crayford wrote:
>
>
> As I previously mentioned this port could be patched to support EBCDIC but
> you will have a heavy lift patching the Flex lexer and Bison tables. Oh well,
> that’s life dealing with the major suckage that is EBCDIC! Also, the
>
Dump 70,72,113 from every system on the z server
Run the following build: MYIN is FB 80
%LET MACKEEP= MACRO _XLA113 _XLA113F % ;
%UTILBLDP(BUILDPDB=NO,USERADD=7072 113,
OUTFILE=MYIN,
WANTSMF=70.1 113.1,
INCLAFTR=ASUM70PR
On Fri, 5 May 2023 18:35:15 +0200, René Jansen wrote:
>
>not more than there is in that GitHub repo. I mailed with Mark Hessling
>yesterday and he is going to merge the changes into the official distribution.
>I am also looking at the docs and we will make sure there is a chapter on z/OS
>in
Hi Gil,
not more than there is in that GitHub repo. I mailed with Mark Hessling
yesterday and he is going to merge the changes into the official distribution.
I am also looking at the docs and we will make sure there is a chapter on z/OS
in there soon.
best regards,
René.
> On 5 May 2023,
On Fri, 5 May 2023 02:52:18 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>...
>> Is there a User's Guide?
>
>The doc is on
>https://sourceforge.net/projects/regina-rexx/files/regina-documentation/ and
>is good.
>
I have that. It contains topics such as:
1.3 Ports of Regina
2.7 Implementation-Specific
Classification: Confidential
Try:
https://coztoolkit.com/docs/sftp/ssh_keys_part1_2012-06-12.pdf
and
https://coztoolkit.com/docs/sftp/ssh_keys_part2_2012-06-19.pdf
for some good background.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Matt Hogstrom
Sent:
Classification: Confidential
SSL keys (contained in the cert) are text strings. Text transfer should fix the
problem.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Matt Hogstrom
Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 8:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Importing
You are, of course, right but using LET just means you should pay attention to
your binder listings!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Harminc
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2023 5:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XLC - Weak symbols
On Fri,
On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 10:54, Robin Atwood wrote:
> You don't need to do anything in the C code but the Binder will give a
> missing external reference (IEW2456E) message. You can specify LET in the
> Binder options to treat RC=8 as non-fatal.
>
This, imho, is a Very Bad Idea. Once you start
On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 09:53, Neale Ferguson wrote:
> Is it possible to declare a “weak” symbol with XLC? i.e. Using GNU C I can
> either
>
> #pragma weak
> extern void * ;
> extern void * __attribute__((weak));
>
> But neither of these forms are accepted by XLC and I can’t see
Matt.
As far as I know RACF cannot import from a z/os unix file. It has to be VB. I
think there is an RFE/Idea requesting unix file support.
Also you said that the source file is ISO 8859-1 which suggests to me that is
base-64 encoded. If so you will see “—— BEGIN” near the start and a similar
Before trying to add it to RACF use the RACDCERT CHECKCERT command. Off
the top of my head, I think it’s RACDCERT CHECKCERT(‘dataset-name’). I
always use that before adding a cert to RACF.And if there is a password
on the cert add PASSWORD(‘password’) to the command. Mind the quotes on
I will be using SAS MXG . I am fine with representing it in MSUs . But how
should i derive it. Will it be siis%
of the lpar total MSUs used in that interval?
On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 2:50 PM, Andreas von Imhof <
02ba5d449f94-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Using type 30's is not my 1st
Using type 30's is not my 1st choice. Need to calculate capture ratio's,
preferably by workload type. Cannot remember if DB2 type enclaves are captured
here or it is all lumped into DB AS.
I think that Shivang wants a total view. The document from John Burg spells it
out quite clearly.
eg page
Where is the problem ?
siis% is number of instructions that suffered SIIS in a given period
MIPS is number of instructions per second
you have cpu-seconds used in a given period or the number of
instructions executed in that given period
you don't want us do the math for you, or?
I am not looking to know how to calculate siis% from smf113 . I am looking
for how to convert SIIS% in terms of MSUs or MIPS.
On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 2:33 PM, Martin Trübner <
047eec287bd9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> the May 2022 update has the numbers you are looking for
>
> Am
the May 2022 update has the numbers you are looking for
Am 04.05.23 um 23:46 schrieb shivang sharma:
Hi ,
Every IBM document discribes this as % . I am trying to get the SIIS% value
in terms of MIPS or MSUs
On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 1:49 AM, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
Shivang,
Check these links.
You don't need to do anything in the C code but the Binder will give a missing
external reference (IEW2456E) message. You can specify LET in the Binder
options to treat RC=8 as non-fatal.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Neale Ferguson
Sent: Friday,
Is it possible to declare a “weak” symbol with XLC? i.e. Using GNU C I can
either
#pragma weak
extern void * ;
extern void * __attribute__((weak));
But neither of these forms are accepted by XLC and I can’t see anything in the
language reference.
I want to define a symbol that
Matt,
I had a similar problem. Make sure you do not have the file open anywhere
else .. I think RACF takes an exclusive lock on it
I had a problem with the v3 version of openssl - the format of the binary
file was changed, and I think RACF did not support it. Try shipping it as
a .pem file.
40 matches
Mail list logo
