On a PDSE a binder of IEFBR14 with alias BR14 then bind of IEFBR14 no alias and
BR14 alias was gone. Use 3.1 on the real member of first bind of IEFBR14
removed alias. Didn’t try to see what happens with 3.1 delete of alias. PDSE
orphaning of alias appears to be addressed at least in ISPF and
Not the way I'd go. If for my sins I were made king of the list, I'd be
more King Log than King Stork. Off-topic doesn't bother me, and it would
take a lot to get me to ban any poster. But I wouldn't mind deleting
individual posts that are deliberately derisive, denigrating or insulting.
---
I worked for an health insurance company. As another poster said, “that's how
all insurance companies function. there's a reason why they're often compared
to a legalized mafia.”
I’m curious as to why you guys can’t seem to ignore the troll? Or create some
filter that you guys mentioned was
The caveat here is, I can no longer run Office 97 as it is not
compatible with W11. I've found that all my older software (that
worked up through W7) will not run under W11.
Argggh! I'm wondering if I can get it to work under V-BOX with
an older W/7 Installation
Steve Thompson
On
I just tested RTF and ODT with Office 365's Word which shows
"Microsoft® Word for Microsoft 365 MSO (Version 2307 Build
16.0.16626.20170) 64-bit "
And it works for both. I used Libre Office to generate both.
Steve Thompson
On 8/19/2023 5:45 PM, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
My memory is far from
It's for this very reason that I still maintain at least
one computer with Windows 3.1 and Word 1.1a.
Everything works, including formulas.
And it came with a great manual.
As well as for preparing documents generally,
I used Word 1.1a for automatically preparing indexes for books.
Trying to
On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 17:14:41 -0500, Dave Kreiss wrote:
>... If the real member is deleted but not all alias(s), those alias(s) are
> orphaned member(s) but the tensing member(s) data (load module) still exist.
>
Did that change with PDSE?
--
gil
Alias entry points have separate directory entries. The alias directory entries
have a flag bit on (I remember there is a DSECT IHAPDS or similar name) which
indicate that this directory entry is an alias and also may have a different
entry point address than the real or other alias members
I'm setting up some sysplex and found some healthcheck is not OK, the
reason was XCFAS was not TRUSTED.
Questions:
1. Is the requirement of the TRUSTED status documented anywhere? That's
good to know before auditor asked.
2. Is there any way to fix it without reIPL?
3. Somehow related to 2. -
Take a look at PDS2EPM
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=areas-pds-directory-entry-format-returned-by-bldl
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 7:29 AM Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> Just looking the user data I got from a BLDL specifically the entry name I
> have multiple (4) entry points
W dniu 15.08.2023 o 02:16, Grant Taylor pisze:
Please do not attack / insult each other.
Let's instead have conversations where it's okay to disagree with each
other while still respecting each other and valuing each other's
opinions.
It's okay to disagree.
It's not okay to insult the
My memory is far from perfect, however I could swear it was RTF. Many
years ago. Or maybe it was another non-DOC format?
I just checked it now - RTF is supported (Word 2013). However uncle
Google shows some vulnerabilities related to Word and RTF.
BTW: my another "favorite" feature of MS is
Wait - the new Word doesn't read RTF?!!
The other changes I'll cheerfully join you in deploring, but this is the only
one that truly shocks me.
Not that I am fluent in RTF. But I did write an ooRexx program once to convert
a collection of plain-text error messages to a decent format using RTF
He had me at "Supports EBCDIC". The other 2 hex editors on my PC don't,
and I've had trouble in the past trying to convert in my head,
especially lower case. One time I remember running a test and purposely
used only numbers as data because I could translate those easily.
On 8/19/2023 10:29
W dniu 15.08.2023 o 17:47, Steve Beaver pisze:
One thing that absolutely scares the hell out of me is converting Office
2010
To any of the new Office Products,
Has anyone converted? What Problems did you have?
(yes, it is off-topic, but I couldn't resist)
Yes, I did.
Conversion from
Other advantages of HxD are:
1. It can edit large files. Much larger than you RAM.
2. It can be set up to "support LRECL" - very useful when working with
files downloaded from z/OS (without CRLF).
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 16.08.2023 o 00:46, Charles Mills pisze:
I use it.
EBCDIC - WnBrowse. Very small, quite old, free. BTW: When no dedicated
tool is available, then regular MS Word could be used.
XMIT - a bunch of viewers listed on cbttape.org. My preferred one is
XiFrame Xmit Explorer.
BTW2: The above tools combined with 7zip or WinRAR provide quite nice
set
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 19:33:03 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>I'm feeling a bit puzzled here! Bash doesn't come pre-installed with
>z/OS; rather, it's a tool ported by Rocket, so there shouldn't be any
>compatibility problems, right? If IBM decides to include zsh, which is
>considered superior to
18 matches
Mail list logo
