You're close. You need to run tmsinit to disable CA-1 and also there are a
couple health checks that you need to disable. There is a section in the CA-1
manual on deactivating CA-1 right after the section on activating it, and in
fact I just did this two weeks ago at a site I manage that
Yes, All of my sites share the same racf cert between their systems. Self
signed can be shared exactly the same way.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 08:37:02PM -0500, Jon Perryman wrote:
> I don't have access to z/OS. Joseph, can you run a simple test to
> find out if this is a problem because others say it's not. Assemble,
> link (with AC=1) and run from JCL the following prog:
Unless something major has changed
On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 01:30:05 -0400, Joseph Reichman
wrote:
Another problem with your code dawned on me. Your IRB routine and passed
storage could be freed while the IRB is still executing. The IRB routine only
does a LOAD but the I/O time could be long enough for the originating program
to
I pointing to the first that would be IKJEFT01
I can interrogate the FLAG bytes RBSTAB at +A to make sure it’s a PRB and
then look at RBCDE to make sure it points to IKJEFT01
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 8:22 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> There are at least two jobstep TCBs in your address space.
>
There are at least two jobstep TCBs in your address space.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Joseph Reichman
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 7:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SCHEDIRB
Thanks
Again, for getting back
All I can say the SVC 8 abended in the IRB routine when I re-linked it with
AC=1 everything was fine
> On Sep 28, 2023, at 8:18 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> AC(1) is only relevant with ATTACH RSAPF=YES, and AFAIK nobody but the
> Initiayor and the TMP does that.
>
>
AC(1) is only relevant with ATTACH RSAPF=YES, and AFAIK nobody but the
Initiayor and the TMP does that.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Joseph Reichman
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 9:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
X-Posted IBM-MAIN and RACF-L. It’s not really a RACF issue, but the right folks
may be hanging out there.
I am trying to educate myself on OCSP.
In the AT-TLS config I code
TTLSEnvironmentAction CAM_FTP_Env
{
Jon
Kudos to you even Peter Relson wasn’t sure if this correct
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon
Perryman
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 10:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SCHEDIRB
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 20:29:52 -0400,
Yeah, sorry, I realized the omission after I posted but decided folks could
figure it out. Here, for completeness:
/* Return the contents of a storage address plus an offset */
/* The address is in "character" (native binary) form and the
We are investigating what is necessary to remove CA-1 from the system after
turning on RMM in protect mode.
My original plan was to us TMSINIT to remove CA-1 and disable the PROC
(TMSINIT) prior to starting DFRMM...
Or do I need to move it's SVC, re-IPL and not start TMSINIT and then start
Yes, that works
(with minor exception to the StorageCO function, but I managed it).
Thank you all who helped!
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 20.09.2023 o 21:28, Charles Mills pisze:
Does this help?
/* Point to the RMF data */
CVT_addr = Storage('10', 4)
Thank you ITschak, Rob, Ituriel and Allan for your replies !
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I'm going to enable TLS on some z15 machine.
I just RTFM and noticed the certificate can be "shared" per CPC.
I understand it as common (shared) certificate for all OSC chpids in the
CPC vs individual certificate for each chpid.
Am I right?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
Classification: Confidential
Look at the code in SHOWZOS on the CBTTAPE. WWW.CBTTAPE.ORG
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Boesel Guillaume
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 8:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Retrieve LPAR weight without
On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 11:48:37 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>I known that if I am running TESTAUTH and I do the test LOAD subcommand and
the pds(member) is not from an APF authorized library I get a nasty message
from TEST
LOAD from non-APF when APF is not allowed. Integrity violation. 306-C
I known that if I am running TESTAUTH and I do the test LOAD subcommand and the
pds(member) is not from an APF authorized library I get a nasty message from
TEST
> On Sep 28, 2023, at 11:40 AM, Binyamin Dissen
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 07:42:37 -0400 Joseph Reichman
> wrote:
>
>>
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:47:21 -0700, Ed Jaffe
wrote:
>On 9/19/2023 6:39 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> Zowe, last I saw, ships an SMP/E install as well as a “convenience” build
>> that is basically a pax file. Given that Zowe basically updates on a
>> frequent basis the update is basically
On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 07:42:37 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
>One more idea you said TSO does SVC screening which is why my LOAD abended
I have written programs that did SVC screening, including setting up screening
before invoking the TMP. Never saw that TSO did SVC screening, and there
should
HiI am looking for old PL/X 3.2 PDFs...Does anyone has it?
Thank youDan
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
This information can also be obtained in REQLPDAT service.
Best Regards
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
z/OS System Programmer
Em quinta-feira, 28 de setembro de 2023 às 11:14:49 BRT, Rob Scott
escreveu:
I am guessing they use the "diagnose" instruction to retrieve this information
(
I've sent the team notice of this.
Found all the links from that page are in the same state. Thanks for
bringing this to our attention,
Kurt Acker
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:11 AM Schmitt, Michael
wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> The links on your website are broken, e.g. publications such as
>
I am guessing they use the "diagnose" instruction to retrieve this information
( Diag 204 if memory serves correctly).
There are other ways to get this information including intercepting SMF 70
records, and calling RMF monitor III programming interfaces.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software.
Sent from
Thank you.
The links on your website are broken, e.g. publications such as
http://download.sinenomine.net/publications/njebridge/SNA-NJE-Bridge.pdf
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Neale Ferguson
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 2:30 AM
To:
I don't know how they do this, but you can access the HMC with a rest api
call to get this data.
ITschak
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring
for z/OS, x/Linux & IBM I **| z/VM coming soon *
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 4:21 PM Boesel
Hi,
With HWIQUERY, I'm able to retrieve the weight of a LPAR but, of course, it
doesn't work if BCPii is not started.
Mainview (LPARACT view) or Sysview (PRISM command) are able to retrieve this
information on LPARs without BCPii.
Is somebody could help me to understand how products like
I did get an abend after SVC 8 in the code that ran the IRB the module was not
linked AC=1
> On Sep 28, 2023, at 9:11 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
>
> Jon P wrote
>
> I believe that LOAD will abend if the module is not linked with the AC=1
> attribute when running authorized.
>
>
> It will
Jon P wrote
I believe that LOAD will abend if the module is not linked with the AC=1
attribute when running authorized.
It will not. You should have AC=1 only for a module that is the target of
something akin to EXEC PGM= (i.e., the jobstep program). It's easier to obey
this rule than to
Thanks
Again, for getting back went to sleep as I had to be up for work
One more idea you said TSO does SVC screening which is why my LOAD abended
I could go one step higher to the initiator
So instead of
L R4,PSATOLD
L R4,TCBJSTCB-TCB(R4)
I could
LR4,PSAAOLD
L
On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 07:21:15 +, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>>> A bad LRECL on the DCB didn't have any affect - DYNALLOC, OPEN, GET all
>>> worked. Coding a bad BLKSIZE causes a S013 abend.
>
>You need to use QSAM/BSAM to read at least 1 record for the abend to happen.
>
I believe the S013 abend
We produce an NJE implementation running on Linux (and other platforms) that
speaks the NJE protocol – both SSL and non-SSL. We have customers using it to
receive job output from JES2/JES3/POWER/RSCS as well as submitting jobs and
sending files the other way.
Further details:
>> A bad LRECL on the DCB didn't have any affect - DYNALLOC, OPEN, GET all
>> worked. Coding a bad BLKSIZE causes a S013 abend.
Ralph,
You need to use QSAM/BSAM to read at least 1 record for the abend to happen.
Thanks,
Kolusu
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 01:30:05AM -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> Thanks
>
> The one glaring thing that was happening was that load was indeed
> abending you said linking it with ac=1 would solve that issue
No, but it needs to come from an authorized library.
> I don't understand your
34 matches
Mail list logo
