There are also some of us independents and other museums that take donations.
I personally am currently looking for equipment, docs, software, and
docs from the ES/9000 era and before.
Likewise, the Binghamton, NY group Techworks! is on the lookout for
any items related to Endicott.
--
Will
On
As to why it work on your LPAR and not the customers you need to look at how to
setup CICS to use RACF. Also CICS you need to look at your CDT entries and you
will probably find you CDT entries have entries that the customer doesn’t
Sent from my iPhone
No one said I could type with one
System Source Computer Museum -- https://museum.syssrc.com/
Contact:
Bob Roswell brosw...@syssrc.com
Brendan Becker bloopmus...@gmail.com
...about potential donations.
I toured the place last week, it's amazing -- huge and diverse
collection, nicely displayed. Great curators, hungry for more
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 09:50:34 -0600, John Blythe Reid
wrote:
>The client never got the RACROUTE macro to work. Instead they've opted to use
>the CICS command EXEC CICS QUERY SECURITY and that works ok. Does anyone think
>that the problem may be due to issuing a RACROUTE macro inside a CICS
On 12/11/2023 2:31 AM, Martin Trübner wrote:
Ed,
>> 2009
that matches the dates on my material
>> how it works
well, I have a SOC4 - dump is in private mail
I was afraid of that.
There is probably a difference between z/OS and z/VSE in some HLASM DSECT.
I don't have the HLASM Toolkit
Show the LIST and EXECUTE form of the RACROUTE.
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 09:50:34 -0600 John Blythe Reid
wrote:
:>The client never got the RACROUTE macro to work. Instead they've opted to use
the CICS command EXEC CICS QUERY SECURITY and that works ok. Does anyone think
that the problem may be due
On 12/11/23 10:13, Phil Smith III wrote:
Charles wrote:
The critical bit is there to provide upward compatibility for
certificates, which are a standard that is implemented in everything
>from z/OS to Nest Thermostats to Balckberrys that have not been
updated in ten years.
The critical bit
The client never got the RACROUTE macro to work. Instead they've opted to use
the CICS command EXEC CICS QUERY SECURITY and that works ok. Does anyone think
that the problem may be due to issuing a RACROUTE macro inside a CICS
transaction ? However the same transaction does work on our LPAR but
SSI is very important for projects whose workflows depend on it!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed
Jaffe
Sent: Saturday, December 9, 2023 9:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Migrating Loadlibs from PDSE to PDS?
On 12/9/2023 5:24 AM,
Charles wrote:
>The critical bit is there to provide upward compatibility for
>certificates, which are a standard that is implemented in everything
>from z/OS to Nest Thermostats to Balckberrys that have not been
>updated in ten years.
>The critical bit says "this extension really matters. If you
Peter, several people have given you some good suggestions. There are a few
things you need to think about.
1) As others have said, EQSA overflow is not a bad thing as long as your ECSA
is okay. At the place I last worked at we routinely saw ESQA overflow on some
of our larger lpars that had
Classification: Confidential
RMF will do this provided VSTOR(D) is specified in ERBRMFxx. It will show the
alllocations, but not necessarily the "actual" user.
E,g. VTAM, TCPIP,.
HTH
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter
Sent: Sunday, December
Our ASM is completely fine and we didn't add the page dataset for a long
time
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, 4:27 PM Jousma, David <
01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Peter, have you been doing any PAGE ADDS, and PAGE DELETES?Years ago,
> when we were migrating to new DASD
Peter, have you been doing any PAGE ADDS, and PAGE DELETES?Years ago, when
we were migrating to new DASD (TDMF wont move active local page datasets), I
exhausted EQSA but didn’t realize it at the time. Now you do PAGE DELETE with
REPLACE to avoid the ESQA problem.
Dave Jousma
Vice
These increase we have been whitenessing in last 1 month and never saw this
overflowing in last 2 years.
No software changes have been made but one of the product upgrade was
backed out but we kept the products LPA SVC module in LPALST as the SVC
module shipped with higher version of the new
I’m wondering why 108% is a problem. I’d say that’s about the right amount of
overflow. Unless you know have a shortage of free ECSA.
Thanks, Martin
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Peter
Date: Monday, 11 December 2023 at 04:29
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Ed,
>> 2009
that matches the dates on my material
>> how it works
well, I have a SOC4 - dump is in private mail
Martin
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Peter,
SDSF has the “CSR” display (Common Storage Remaining) and on later releases you
can even issue the “JCS” action (Job Common Storage) against a row on the CSR
panel to drill down to each individual chunk of common storage (and browse it
if you so wish).
For in-use common storage, see
18 matches
Mail list logo
