I did the same thing my first month as a sysprog. Thank goodness for shared
DASD and a second system.
Since it's Friday:
On a similar note, we were running a very early release of MVS on an
Amdahl V6 (serial #19).
We had been told that a couple of other
How about the default or current logon group for the id? Does it have an
OMVS segment?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tim Brown
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 2:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Depending on how (and how much) output is produced by the second program, this
might helpl (especially if you are outtrapping):
VARSTORAGE(HIGH),
- SPECIFIES THAT CLIST VARIABLES, AND REXX OUTTRAP
VARIABLES RETURNED WHEN REXX INVOKES AN AUTHORIZED
COMMAND, ARE
I know of two extremely large US banks that use it.
Both have RACF & T/S; at least one is (or was) in the throes of converting RACF
to T/S.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, September 09,
IBM 3088 CTC
Global Resource Serialization
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Jacobs - Listserv
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GRS Control Unit ( Was IBM mainframe
John, are you Win7 Pro or Home?
Pro has the old XP support Home doesn't...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF
( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log Monitoring)
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Gross, Randall [PRI-1PP]
randy.gr...@primerica.com wrote:
John, are you Win7 Pro or Home?
Pro has the old XP support Home doesn't...
​Window 7 Professional Service Pack 1, 64 bit. This is my computer at work.
I am
If it makes you feel any better, I can reproduce your exact error on my 2.1
system
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
From APAR OA45005:
Exported symbolic parameters must be set to a value in the
job stream after the EXPORT statement. Exported symbol
values are resolved to the last value set prior to or
within the current job step. JCL Converter processing
generates EXPORT EXPSET statements to
Personal Communications 5.9.0Product DocumentationBooksEmulator User's
ReferenceTransferring Files
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 12:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Don't you mean sysvar(systermid)?
I don't think he's looking for the number of lines in the screen
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Roger Suhr (gmail)
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 3:01 PM
To:
The ALLOCATE command has a RELEASE parameter 1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tim Brown
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 2:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Dataset space release
Can space
looking for the like button.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Conway
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MVS
Freaking pedants. You all know the base is
Google CATSRCHI
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ravi Gaur
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 10:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Catalog Search Interface - Guide to decode
Could somebody help me understanding
Maybe + instead of - for continuation?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of willie bunter
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: DFHSM QUESTION - FIXCDS - PARSE ERROR
Hallo To All
I
Don't forget chitlin's grits
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ken Porowski
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 1:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: international cuisine; was Re: OT: Re: Freebie software;
We also use DBS and are very happy with it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 9:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DASD backup solutions
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014
In college, I used the PL/1 F compiler on a 360/40 running PCP, circa 1971.
It was horribly buggy. Of course, I have no idea if the college kept
maintenance up to date.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of M Baker
Sent:
I am a full-time mainframe (RACF) security engineer (I hate that term...) and
have been for almost nine years.
Prior to that, I was a zOS (MFT, SVS, MVS, OS390, XA, ESA, etc.) systems
programmer for approximately 30 years (for two very large companies that each
have a 3-letter name).
IHMO, I
John,
Actually, I do agree with you, and no offense was taken.
\
Interestingly enough, when I was interviewing here, it was for a
sysprog opening.
After being interviewd by the sysprog manager and the VP of operations,
I had a final interview with the CIO.
ALGOL was the first high-level language I learned, on a Burroughs B5500.
I liked it a lot, except that it was special character happy, using the full
64-character set found on the model 029 129 keypunches.
The college only had four 029's (that students could use) but they had a bunch
of
Try initializing the stem to null (outstem. = ).
A null entry will terminate the EXECIO.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of George Shedlock
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 8:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
In 1972, as a new hire, I was given the task of maintaining an entire
COBOL application that was written with altered gotos and not a single
perform.
When I asked why, I was told that their standard was to use altered
gotos instead of performs, because they were more efficient.
This ruling was
We used to call this the any idiot theory of debugging:
After working a trans-finite amount of time trying to debug a program,
any idiot will walk up and immediately point out your error.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
24 matches
Mail list logo
