Listcat the zFS. It is the secondary allocation by default, I do believe.
You can override this by hand with the zfsadm grow command but if it is
done as a result of the AGGRGROW parm on the mount it is the secondary
allocation of the linear VSAM cluster, IIRC.
Thomas Ambros
Operating
You wrote:
In such case one should write new IOCDS from current IODF file.
Always, then switch it to active in the HCD dialog after activating the
IODF. That write protects it. I'm fairly certain that releases write
protect on the last one.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity
In my opinion you may run into some interesting issues with timestamped
stuff in the CFs and whatnot if the times start coming in a slightly
unpredictable sequence. I don't think I'd take that risk.
When we migrated from ETR to mixed to all STP CTN, the key was two
machines were ETR and had
You don't have another working console in the sysplex? If you don't vary
the offending system out of the sysplex when it behaves as you describe
it'll be a while (failure interval) before serialized resources are freed
up and any new serialization takes place, if I remember correctly. If you
Perhaps because it is a new version all that stuff starts over. Just a
guess.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Storr, Lon A CTR USARMY HRC (US) lon.a.storr@mail.mil
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 11/20/2013 09:10
Subject:
Is there any reason to change the console ID other than to your boss's ID
right before you do something mischievous?
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 10/04/2013
A group is concerned that we have a single RACF database and there is no
'test' RACF database where the organization can implement 'test' rulesets.
We have two sysplexes - a systems sandbox with no applications and a
mixed development/production sysplex where all the applications reside.
The
z9 with three partitions, activated in order A, B, C. No reserved storage
defined. We need to remove some storage from C and assign it to A.
Without any operations on B, can we deactivate C, reduce initial storage,
reactivate it and then deactivate A later that night, increase initial
PR/SM Planning Guide spells it out.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Tom Ambros thomas_amb...@keybank.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 07/11/2013 09:20
Subject:Central Storage reallocation on z9 - requirement
(and
prevent us from having to rtfm in order to sleep well tonight): the
answer is NO?
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Tom Ambros
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 16:13
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Central
, but at this point that's all it is, a guess.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Tom Ambros
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 9:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Central Storage reallocation on z9 - requirement
We're migrating from mixed-mode to STP-only mode in the near future. The
standalone coupling facilities are such that we will need to drop the CF
links to the last ETR-only machine after it is shut down and replace them
with STP-only links between the coupling facilities, no room to do
I vaguely remember some advice somewhere that it is cleaner to remove the
CF definitions as you go. 'Setting Up A Sysplex' has procedures to do
this. Same reason we don't maintain the DR CF definitions in our policies
because structure allocation may get twisty.
I'd go something like this:
Does the product give you the option of specifying the SVC number, a la
Hogan?
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: David Andrews d...@lists.duda.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 03/05/2013 08:21
Subject:Re: Assigning Same
ROUTED or LOCAL? I *think* it may have to be ROUTED but I am not finding
any information to conclusively prove that and before I test it out, I
ask. The reason I ask is because I have reason to specify a traffic
descriptor for a restricted set of ports and that would not be in
compliance
Family are producers in Vermont so seeing the cache described in the NYT
as the 'global strategic reserve' gave me a chuckle.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:
Of Tom Ambros
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Correlating workstation userid to TN3270 logon using client
certificates
I apologize if this has been covered already, but I probably need to tell
somebody if this can be done before I read up and put
I apologize if this has been covered already, but I probably need to tell
somebody if this can be done before I read up and put the pieces together.
If I have an SSL-capable emulator, is it possible to validate the client
certificate and extract the userid (this part, at least, I know can be
We are in the process of implementing the Payment Card Industry Data
Security Standards and in an effort to cover everything and not be obliged
to look at each instance in a one-off we are curious how other sysplex
implementations were done. We would like to understand if we can approach
this
That's strange, they work fine as Rexx for me:
JCL: Note line 4
//REMOTE DD DISP=SHR,DSN=MSYS.UCMD.REMOTEPDQR.(SYSTEM)
//REMOTE DD DISP=SHR,DSN=MSYS.UCMD.REMOTEPDQR.(SYSTEM)
//REMOTE DD DISP=SHR,DSN=MSYS.UCMD.REMOTEPDQR(SYSTEM)
//* TEST LINE TO BE X ALL'ED AND NOT FOUND IN FIND ALLS
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:12:54 -0700, John Mattson wrote:
And the grand prize goes to Tom Ambros
Yes, use DOUBLE AMPERSANDS in REXX and the FINDs work properly.
So simple when we finally see it. Many thanks to everyone.
So is the behavior of EDIT different when
Is it possible that if you code PDQR as PDQR edit strips the first
ampersand and looks for the string the way you want? I have some code
which does something similar with SYSNAME variable in the started task
JCL. I change a string containing that variable during DR adjustments of
the VTAM
Complicated legacy mainframe system? It's CA-7! If they think that's
complicated they probably can't work a Mr. Coffee.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 06/27/2012
) 301.986.3574
(cell) 301.996.1318
Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Ambros
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 8:25 AM
To: IBM
24 matches
Mail list logo
