If there is no BCDS information for a dataset, then as far as HSM is
concerned the dataset has no backup. Unless you patch HSM, it will not
delete a dataset that has no backup.
Determining how this occurred may be more trouble than it is worth if the
datasets were migrated long ago. You could
I would vote for the one that is the easiest to maintain because someone
will surely want to change it long after everyone has forgotten the
rationale for any decision.
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of David
Why don't you produce a 3.4 list of the DSNs in question and use the //
block command to process all them at once. This will eliminate any
confusion about wild cards.
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of esmie moo
EXPIREBV will never touch an ML0/ML1/ML2 dataset. It deals only with backup
copies of datasets.
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of Michael Wickman
:: Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:57 AM
:: To:
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of willie bunter
:: Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 9:29 AM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: ADR405E (041)-DYNA (02), DYNAMIC ALLOCATION OF VOLUME FB8ACC
:: FAILED. ERROR
The languages have just enough in common to propagate the myth the C is a
proper subset of C++. There are valid C constructs that will not compile
under C++ rules. One example (with the usual prototype in scope) is
int *ptr = malloc(1024);
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM
Wouldn't that depend on why you are changing the date? What is the real
issue for which a date change is your chosen solution?
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of willie bunter
:: Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012
I'm confused. Under what conditions does the job fail?
Why do you have a conditional access for these datasets? What benefit do
you think it provides? It doesn't provide any additional security (though
it might prevent an accident). If any member of the group wants to update
the dataset other
Since this is perfectly legal C and C++, it seems you should be opening a
PMR with your compiler vendor.
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
:: Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 4:51 PM
:: To:
The problem with using a pointer instead of an array is that the pointer
points to a string literal and any attempt to modify the literal invokes
undefined behavior. A statement of the form
s6[0] = 'x';
is legal with the array but not with the pointer.
The fact that the expression
to a field like
:: this,
::
:: Jobn char[40];
::
:: memset(Jobn,'0',sizeof(Jobn));
:: strcpy(Jobn,x);
::
:: Otherwise strcmp fails, where x is the parameter string
::
:: Scott ford
:: www.identityforge.com
::
:: On Sep 4, 2012, at 1:05 PM, retired mainframer retired-
:: mainfra...@q.com wrote
I assume you mean you have datasets whose names imply they contain target or
DLIB zones. It is possible that the missing global zone is actually in one
of these datasets.
You could use the SMPE panels (or a batch SMPE job) to try to open each of
these datasets in turn. SMPE should fail if the
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of Ed Gould
:: Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 10:31 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: Re: Space Allocation In Bytes
::
:: LiZette:
::
:: I think you can get a freeware
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
:: Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 5:09 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: Re: Space Allocation In Bytes
::
:: On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:26:40 -0700, Lizette
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of R.S.
:: Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 3:34 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: Re: Space Allocation In Bytes
::
:: W dniu 2012-08-25 17:49, Skip Robinson pisze:
::
::
:: retired mainframer wrote:
::
:: I have the complete 9 CD Online Library OS/390 Collection, dated
:: September 1998, SK2T-6700-10. If anyone has any use for it, I will
:: gladly mail them the CDs and the IBM binder. I will wait a week or so
:: for off-line responses before contributing them
BTDT. But at least the guy who follows you will have something better than
what you were left with.
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of McKown, John
:: Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 5:41 AM
:: To:
ISMF options 3, 4, 5, and 6 have the LSTPRT command to document the
properties of every data class, management class, storage class, and storage
group.
Option 7 can identify from where each of the ACS routines was compiled so
you can find the source if it still exists. It can also identify any
Why do you think that additional backup copies will alleviate an
underallocation condition in the primary MCDS?
If you want to keep 6 copies of MCDS backups, you also need to keep 6 copies
of the BCDS, JRNL, and OCDS. But keep in mind that their only purpose is
historical.
To inform HSM of the
In the job, is the STEPLIB or JOBLIB APF authorized? Is the library
explicitly authorized or implicitly via LNKLST. Is the main module of the
IVP authorized?
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of Button, Chris
::
I have the complete 9 CD Online Library OS/390 Collection, dated September
1998, SK2T-6700-10. If anyone has any use for it, I will gladly mail them
the CDs and the IBM binder. I will wait a week or so for off-line responses
before contributing them to the city land-fill.
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
:: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 5:11 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: Re: Creating a GDG Base with NOSCRATCH in an SMS pool
::
:: So, if I run a
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of John McKown
:: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 5:23 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: Re: Creating a GDG Base with NOSCRATCH in an SMS pool
::
snip
::
:: 3.4 only
:: -Original Message-
:: From: Uriel Carrasquilla uriel.carrasqui...@mail.mcgill.ca
:: Sent: Aug 20, 2012 2:34 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: Re: HSM - space for full recall
::
:: We have all the HSM ML2 on VTL and the VTL guy is telling me that I am
:: using 70 TBytes.
::
STORCLAS and MGMTCLAS apply only to SMS datasets which must be catalogued.
You could use the Catalog Search Interface to extract the names of in use
classes or to search for one or more specific classes.
The same will work for DATACLAS for the catalogued datasets. For
uncatalogued ones, I don't
Expire BV supplements the actions of Secondary Space Management for both SMS
and non-SMS datasets
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of Staller, Allan
:: Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 1:35 PM
:: To:
Do the entries for the clusters also exist in the USERCAT? If so, you
should specify the cluster name in the DELETE ... NOSCRATCH command.
If not, you need to figure out how the cluster was deleted but not the data
component and prevent it from happening again.
One brute force way to end up
Does the type 66 SMF record have what you want (and type 61 for new GDGs)?
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On
:: Behalf Of Donnelly, John
:: Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 9:17 AM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
:: Subject: GDG
501 - 528 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
