AW: Re: AT-TLS question

2014-05-03 Thread Peter Hunkeler
Yes, it does the encryption (and more important - the negotiation) without the z/OS application having to be aware, though the app can be if it wants to. [snip] Trying to summarize what I understand so far. An SSL capable application does all the handshake and en/decryption stuff by itself.

Re: AW: Re: AT-TLS question

2014-05-03 Thread Jim McAlpine
Yes, that's basically it as I now understand. We currently have it configured for CICS sockets but now also want to configure it where z/OS is the client and Websphere on windows is the SSL client. See below for SHARE presentation. https://share.confex.com/share/120/webprogram/Session12775.html

Re: AW: Re: AT-TLS question

2014-05-03 Thread Jim McAlpine
That should have said SSL server and not SSL client obviously. Jim Mc. On 3 May 2014 10:28, Jim McAlpine jim.mcalp...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, that's basically it as I now understand. We currently have it configured for CICS sockets but now also want to configure it where z/OS is the client and

AW: Re: AT-TLS question

2014-05-02 Thread Peter Hunkeler
Yes - this is probably the classic use case for AT-TLS. Wouldn't this only encrypt the path from ip to ip. ip would decrypt and send plain text to WebSphere? I understand application transparent to say that the traffic is enctrypted on the wire (only) without the help of applications. Am I