Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-13 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:50:22 -0600, Dale R. Smith wrote: > >http://www.computerworld.com/article/3163192/data-center/just-because-it-fails-doesnt-mean-its-a-failure.html > I had one of those, many years ago. We were trying to convert our programmers from HLASM to an ISV cross-assembler. One of

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-13 Thread Dale R. Smith
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:57:56 +, Pommier, Rex wrote: >All, > >Just to circle back and close the issue, I was "barking up the wrong tree" >with the IGZ0268W message. Turns out the driver program that was calling the >OS/VS COBOL program had a logic error in it that

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-13 Thread Pommier, Rex
o:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 4:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL/LE question We're starting down that path. Management doesn't want to have to recompile things but I'm thinking we may need to do so just to see

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-04 Thread scott Ford
Rex, I sure would re-compile the Cobol programs. I have ran into issues but it was going backward. It was in regard to callable LE functions and what was supported... Scott On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Bill Woodger wrote: > The IGZ0268W is a warning message (no

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-02 Thread Bill Woodger
The IGZ0268W is a warning message (no kidding). If your are using up to Enterprise COBOL V4.2 (which you are), it is just a warning that some time in the future (going to V5+, or perhaps with some future LE) you *will* have a problem. If you are using V5+ (which you are not) it is a problem

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-02 Thread Pommier, Rex
No I don't. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Beaver Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 9:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL/LE question You would not happen to have z/XDC to debug this mess

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-02 Thread Steve Beaver
You would not happen to have z/XDC to debug this mess? Steve -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 9:15 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL/LE question Hi

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-02 Thread Pommier, Rex
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Sri h Kolusu Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 5:30 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL/LE question Rex, I forgot to mention that DO NOT SET RTEREUS(ON) as default. Just set it for the particular job you are having problem with. Something

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-01 Thread Sri h Kolusu
/#!topic/bit.listserv.ibm-main/DFSpeCSKUog https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bit.listserv.ibm-main/_QnqYPU3eIk Thanks, Kolusu From: "Pommier, Rex" <rpomm...@sfgmembers.com> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 02/01/2017 03:41 PM Subject: COBOL/

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-01 Thread Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)
IGZ0268W means that OS/VS COBOL is trying to interface with COBOL 5. Which is a no-no. Thanks, Tom Savor Software Developer, Sr FRMS-SCM Fiserv -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-01 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: COBOL/LE question i am guess the c/vs was nores nodynam and the asm90 is your real trouble maker Sent from my iPhone Steve Beaver > On Feb 1, 2017, at 16:58, Steve Beaver <st...@stevebeaver.com> wrote: > > Rex OS VS call Wold to call Bo

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-01 Thread Steve Beaver
problem. >> >> Rex >> >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On >> Behalf Of Steve Beaver >> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 4:54 PM >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> S

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-01 Thread Steve Beaver
need to do so just to see if that's the > problem. > > Rex > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Steve Beaver > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 4:54 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-01 Thread Steve Beaver
t; To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: COBOL/LE question > > I have a simple question do you happen to have a the source modules that if > you attempted to reassemble them and recompile them to see if that's the > problem > > Sent from my iPhone > Steve Beaver >

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-01 Thread Pommier, Rex
: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 4:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL/LE question I have a simple question do you happen to have a the source modules that if you attempted to reassemble them and recompile them to see if that's the problem Sent from my iPhone Steve Beaver > On Fe

Re: COBOL/LE question

2017-02-01 Thread Steve Beaver
I have a simple question do you happen to have a the source modules that if you attempted to reassemble them and recompile them to see if that's the problem Sent from my iPhone Steve Beaver > On Feb 1, 2017, at 16:41, Pommier, Rex wrote: > > Hello all, > > We are

COBOL/LE question

2017-02-01 Thread Pommier, Rex
Hello all, We are in the process of migrating from z/OS 1.13 to 2.2. We just ran into an issue with our COBOL and LE environment. We are running COBOL 4.2. Within the maintenance for COBOL and the upgrade in LE from 1.13 to 2.2, IBM introduced the warning message "IGZ0268W An invocation was