Re: Cobol Install FS issue

Hello All, Problem has been resolved. I think somebody messed up SIGYHFS which was causing issue and its been corrected now. Thanks all for help. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Andrew Rowley wrote: > In your initial question you showed path >

Re: Cobol Install FS issue

In your initial question you showed path /Service/usr/lpp/cobol/../../demo/oosample/Check.j ".." refers to the parent directory, so doesn't this resolve to /Service/usr/demo/oosample/Check.j // Andrew Rowley On 15/03/2016 2:41, venkat kulkarni wrote: Here also its same

Re: Cobol Install FS issue

Here also its same /usr/lpp/cobol/demo/oosample/Check.java. This file should be created during applying process of this FMID. On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Doug Henry wrote: > On my system I can see this file name is > /usr/lpp/cobol/demo/oosample/Check.java. Unless

Re: Cobol Install FS issue

No, its mounted under R/W . On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Staller, Allan wrote: > Check file permissions. Is the zFS file read only? > > > I can clearly see all file systems are mounted correctly . > > HFS 190 ACTIVE

Re: Cobol Install FS issue

On my system I can see this file name is /usr/lpp/cobol/demo/oosample/Check.java. Unless you truncated your display yours end with j instead of java. Doug On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:52:52 +0530, venkat kulkarni wrote: >Hello All, > I can clearly see all

Re: Cobol Install FS issue

Check file permissions. Is the zFS file read only? I can clearly see all file systems are mounted correctly . HFS 190 ACTIVE RDWR 03/06/2016 L=138 NAME=OMVS.MVS1.ZOS13.SIGYROOT23.40.14Q=138 PATH=/Service/usr/lpp/cobol

Re: Cobol Install FS issue

List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mainframe Mainframe Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 10:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Cobol Install FS issue Thanks for reply. I am installing Cobol in new file system, I don't find any issues with this directory structure. I tried

Re: Cobol Install FS issue

; > >Sent: Mar 11, 2016 8:16 PM > >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > >Subject: Re: Cobol Install FS issue > > > >Thanks for reply. I am installing Cobol in new file system, I don't find > >any issues with this directory structure. I tried all but not able to come

Re: Cobol Install FS issue

DU >Subject: Re: Cobol Install FS issue > >Thanks for reply. I am installing Cobol in new file system, I don't find >any issues with this directory structure. I tried all but not able to come >out with this issue. > > >BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D. A

Re: Cobol Install FS issue

Thanks for reply. I am installing Cobol in new file system, I don't find any issues with this directory structure. I tried all but not able to come out with this issue. BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D. A LINK FAILED FOR LINK NAME

Re: Cobol Install FS issue

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:47:58 +0530, Mainframe Mainframe wrote: >Hello Group, > While installing Cobol 5.2, I am getting below issue. > >BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D. A LINK FAILED FOR >LINK NAME

Re: COBOL Install

Thanks alot for help and answering the query . On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Timothy Sipples wrote: > Clark Morris wrote: > >Check your licensing requirements. Normally there is only a short > >period when you can run 2 versions without having to pay for both. > > It's

Cobol Install FS issue

Hello Group, While installing Cobol 5.2, I am getting below issue. BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D. A LINK FAILED FOR LINK NAME /Service/usr/lpp/cobol/../../demo/oosample/Check.j I did check for all directory path and I don't find any issues with this. I

Re: COBOL Install

Clark Morris wrote: >Check your licensing requirements. Normally there is only a short >period when you can run 2 versions without having to pay for both. It's normally 12 months for IBM Monthly License Charge products. However, if you have IBM Country Multiplex Pricing there is no time limit,

Re: COBOL Install

') MOUNTPOINT('/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv5r2') MODE(RDRW) /* can be MODE(READ) */ TYPE(ZFS) Or I misunderstood the op question. Lizette -Original Message- >From: Bill Woodger <bill.wood...@gmail.com> >Sent: Mar 2, 2016 2:21 AM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: COBOL

COBOL Install

The JCL for the compiles are substantially different, so your customer will have to select the correct option from a panel you provide (presumably). There is no direct impediment to running two different COBOL compilers concurrently. You'll probably have one just sitting entirely in a STEPLIB,

Re: COBOL Install

Thanks for reply. You Mean, customer will be able to use both version of cobol. v4.2 and v5.2 On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:35 AM, David Crayford wrote: > On 2/03/2016 2:02 PM, Mainframe Mainframe wrote: > >> Hello Group, >> We have COBOL V4.2 in our system

Re: COBOL Install

On 2/03/2016 2:02 PM, Mainframe Mainframe wrote: Hello Group, We have COBOL V4.2 in our system and recently we installed v5.2 as well. Now my customers want to use both of these version. Is it possible or as we installed v5.2 on same file system, they can use only v5.2 not

COBOL Install

Hello Group, We have COBOL V4.2 in our system and recently we installed v5.2 as well. Now my customers want to use both of these version. Is it possible or as we installed v5.2 on same file system, they can use only v5.2 not the v4.2 Any suggestion please.