I worked @ Morino Associates with Dr. Artis around 1983-84. I was in
TSO/MON development/support, he was Director of Analytic Systems (MICS).
Anyway, I was there at work early one morning weekday and he happened to be
there in the same room also working. Out of the blue he turns to me and
says
Karl S Huf wrote:
>I would refer anyone genuinely interested in sibling pend to download and
review Dr. H. Pat Artis's "Sibling Pend: Like a Wheel Within a Wheel" 1996
CMG paper (available to download at Dr. Pat's site http://www.perfassoc.com
).
Thanks! I had seen that link but wasn't sure I
On 7/11/22 1:32 PM, Karl S Huf wrote:
I would refer anyone genuinely interested in sibling pend to
download and review Dr. H. Pat Artis's "Sibling Pend: Like a Wheel
Within a Wheel" 1996 CMG paper (available to download at Dr. Pat's
site http://www.perfassoc.com ). While the technology
: [EXT] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: EXTERNAL: Re: FedEx to move entirely to the
cloud [Internal]
This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or
open attachments unless you have verified this email is legitimate.
Hi Phil,
That is odd that there isn't more written about sibling
Hi Phil,
That is odd that there isn't more written about sibling pend. IDK if solid
state disk suffers to the same extent as spinning spindles but I would guess
not. Short description is that typical disk array configuration was to take
the disks and carve them up into a bunch of smaller
Dave Barry wrote:
>No surprise. FedEx announce years ago that they were getting off the
mainframe "next year."
What, you expected them to do it OVERNIGHT?
I'm here all week.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Yeah, that "savings" seems unlikely given cost of cloud usage. But as
someone noted, OpEx vs. CapEx, plus folks moving on before the excrement
hits the rotating object, could explain it all.
Rex Pommier wrote, in part:
> I finally got a physical drive mapping from them and discovered it was
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: EXTERNAL: Re: FedEx to move entirely to the cloud
[Internal]
Before "cloud" I worked with one government agency who moved from z/OS to
"virtualisation on utility platform" - basically x86 on-prem. They found they
needed mo
Before "cloud" I worked with one government agency who moved from z/OS to
"virtualisation on utility platform" - basically x86 on-prem. They found
they needed more x86 capacity than they planned for, and then had 3 vendors
to worry about. I got involved in a performance problem and could see
Not spending $400 million in one place to spend 2x, 3x... more in another
is how I have seen the statistics work for some orgs, noting different
amounts of spend of course.
Please note that I have no insight into things at FedEx or how this was
calculated.
It will be interesting to see, if
That number was announced at their investors meeting 2 weeks ago. Trying so
hard to get the stock back over 300. And trying to get a multiple like UPS.
There’s no way they achieve 400 million annually.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, July 8, 2022, 8:07 AM, Usher, Darrold
Hard to believe saving $400 million annually. I assume they are factoring in
Microsoft Azure costs.
Classification: Internal
Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are the property of USAA and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended
recipient,
12 matches
Mail list logo