from someone who has
already done those experiments.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Massimo Biancucci
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 9:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Anyone familiar with how
Grazie. Nessun problema. Posso leggere un po d'italiano.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Massimo Biancucci
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 11:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Anyone familiar with how
Apologies if this is a duplicate post; I sent this a couple of days ago
but never saw it in the digest.
Note that this is not an interface, nor a commitment that it will stay
this way forever; there is no current activity that would lead one to
think a change is forthcoming.
This is from the
that (for now at least) the longest possible run
will be 127 bytes.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 6:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: anyone familiar
Is anyone familiar with the internals of CSRCESRV run-length compression?
I am familiar with RLE schemes in general -- typically a run of n identical
characters is replaced with something like escapencharacter. Does
anyone know the specifics of z/OS's scheme? What is the escape character?
How is n
On 10 June 2013 19:58, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Is anyone familiar with the internals of CSRCESRV run-length compression?
I am familiar with RLE schemes in general -- typically a run of n identical
characters is replaced with something like escapencharacter. Does
anyone know
: Anyone familiar with how z/OS CSRCESRV works?
On 10 June 2013 19:58, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Is anyone familiar with the internals of CSRCESRV run-length
compression?
I am familiar with RLE schemes in general -- typically a run of n
identical characters is replaced with something
In m3mx40basm@garlic.com, on 06/18/2012
at 04:54 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com said:
betatest for product was 1969
When did design start?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2http://patriot.net/~shmuel
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're
In
caarmm9qzhn7172t7zvtkpapp+qqkbdhzjxaaoyq5cztm_aj...@mail.gmail.com,
on 06/18/2012
at 05:56 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net said:
I don't know CICS, but HASP also used few of the available OS
services. Here's an excerpt from a little 1970-ish course handbook
(SR23-3697-0) that explains
In 5581573438612873.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
06/18/2012
at 04:42 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Doesn't MFT stand for Multiprogramming with a Fixed number of
Tasks?
Don't confuse etymology with semantics. Not only did more recent
releases of OS/360 support
scott_j_f...@yahoo.com (Scott Ford) writes:
Check this out, boy this looks vaguely familiar like CICS or DB2 ..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hadoop_1.png
note that CICS was originally to avoid having to use as few os/360
resources as possible ... because os/360 processing
11 matches
Mail list logo