etz
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 5:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Help with SCHEDxx Parmlib vs. IEFSDPPT in Linklib
IMHO, IEFSDPPT is an anachronism and you should use SCHEDxx unless there are
compelling reasons not to.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~sme
Best practice is surely to do what the vendor (ISV or IBM) tells you to do
in this regard. You shouldn't be (and likely are not) making up things to
put in SCHEDxx. You should not be modifying entries in IEFSDPPT.
I suspect that some IBM products that need a PPT entry are not identified
in
W dniu 20.08.2020 o 16:58, Carmen Vitullo pisze:
I'm afraid to say I am in the same boat, old entries never removed for the same
reason, If there are duplicate entries I'm not sure who wins, I suspect SCHEDxx
because it is loaded after?
I suspect only OEM product entries should be in SCHEDxx
20, 2020 11:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Help with SCHEDxx Parmlib vs. IEFSDPPT in Linklib
My main question is which should be used?
The sysprogs over time do not always read manuals or review parmlib for
changes. I know this has been out there for a really long time.
I am
On 8/19/2020 3:00 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
List -
I have been researching whether we need to review all of our SCHEDxx for PPT
and remove anything that is currently shipped by IBM in Linklib for IEFSDPPT
Does anyone have any observations on this?
I am currently working on some
Check the z/OS Initialization and Tuning Reference. Table 55 lists the
supplied entries for the SCHEDxx PPT. This is what I used to clean up my PPT
entries.
Matthew
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
maybe somewhat helpful, I checked the CA-AUDIT report I received and checked
out SCHED00 member
this is what I found
DATASET SMFPREF
PROGRAM WHEREINTEG SECURITY NON- TIMING CPU STOR
NAME
And I thought there was a D PPT command now too.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:11 AM Peter Relson wrote:
> It doesn't seem like the posts were answering Lizette's thought/question.
>
>
>
>
>
> I have been researching whether we need to review all of our SCHEDxx for
>
> PPT
>
> and remove anything
My main question is which should be used?
The sysprogs over time do not always read manuals or review parmlib for
changes. I know this has been out there for a really long time.
I am trying to understand which is needed today.
If we should go with the LINKLIB module, what do I do to SCHEDxx -
I'm afraid to say I am in the same boat, old entries never removed for the same
reason, If there are duplicate entries I'm not sure who wins, I suspect SCHEDxx
because it is loaded after?
I suspect only OEM product entries should be in SCHEDxx but I probably have
entries that need to be
, August 20, 2020 7:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Help with SCHEDxx Parmlib vs. IEFSDPPT in Linklib
It doesn't seem like the posts were answering Lizette's thought/question.
I have been researching whether we need to review all of our SCHEDxx for PPT
and remove anything
It doesn't seem like the posts were answering Lizette's thought/question.
I have been researching whether we need to review all of our SCHEDxx for PPT
and remove anything that is currently shipped by IBM in Linklib for IEFSDPPT
This relates to whether you want things in your SCHEDxx that are
It doesn't seem like the posts were answering Lizette's thought/question.
I have been researching whether we need to review all of our SCHEDxx for
PPT
and remove anything that is currently shipped by IBM in Linklib for
IEFSDPPT
This relates to whether you want things in your SCHEDxx that are
Hi Lizette -
We used to meticulously go through the SCHEDxx defaults and carefully "nullify"
any entries for products that we were not using, but it just became an
administrative and logistical headache. So, after some amount of research and
internal discussion, we finally decided that this
Subject to APF.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 3:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Help with SCHEDxx Parmlib vs
PPT can assign authority to program names instead of user-id. Review
entries that are assigned bypass security, or bypass data integrity
(usually storage keys as well). Have a look at STIG document AAMV0160 from
DISA. BTW, our product, IronSphere, monitors and reports on this
automatically.
List -
I have been researching whether we need to review all of our SCHEDxx for PPT
and remove anything that is currently shipped by IBM in Linklib for IEFSDPPT
Does anyone have any observations on this?
I am currently working on some DB2 upgrades and it was recommended to remove
IRLM
17 matches
Mail list logo
