Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 5:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Get off JES3 is the message was Re: IBM Unveils New IBM
Z with Pervasive Encryption
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Edward Gould <edgould1...@comcast.net>
wrote:
> > On Jul 17, 2017, at 2:21
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Edward Gould
wrote:
> > On Jul 17, 2017, at 2:21 PM, Clark Morris
> wrote:
> >
> > [Default] On 16 Jul 2017 21:36:43 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> > sipp...@sg.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) wrote:
> >
> >>
> On Jul 17, 2017, at 2:21 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
>
> [Default] On 16 Jul 2017 21:36:43 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> sipp...@sg.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) wrote:
>
>> IBM's press release is available here:
>>
>>
W dniu 2017-07-17 o 22:17, Gibney, Dave pisze:
As an aside, I spent several years with a uni-processor (z800). There are
significant benefits to having at least 2 processors. The benefits of
fewer/faster processors go hockey stick when fewer becomes 1.
Amen to that!
The less processors the
M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 6:12 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: z/VM subcapacity pricing (Was: IBM Unveils New IBM Z with
> Pervasive Encryption)
>
> Tim,
>
> I am not sure I have a good understand
[Default] On 16 Jul 2017 21:36:43 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
sipp...@sg.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) wrote:
>IBM's press release is available here:
>
>https://www.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/52805.wss
>
Ater reading the release one strong message I got was that shops
should get off JES3.
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>Just to make sure I understood it:
>Let's assume I have z/VM licensed for 2 processors and machine
>5CP+2IFL+2ICF+2zIIP, and another machine 1CP. Before the announcement I
>was able to legally run z/VM on IFLs on primary machine or on 1CP on
>secondary machine (but not
IBM has posted its Large Systems Performance Reference (LSPR) tables for
the new IBM z14. The z/OS 2.2 tables (including for the IBM z13s and for
prior models) are available here:
https://www.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/lib03060.nsf/pages/lsprITRzOSv2r2?OpenDocument
z/VM 6.4 ITR ratio tables
Timothy,
Just to make sure I understood it:
Let's assume I have z/VM licensed for 2 processors and machine
5CP+2IFL+2ICF+2zIIP, and another machine 1CP. Before the announcement I
was able to legally run z/VM on IFLs on primary machine or on 1CP on
secondary machine (but not concurrently:
Tim,
I am not sure I have a good understanding of this.
Now, to your post. You actually hit a problem we have. We have a z/10
that is running 5 z/OS LPARs and memory allocation is not the best. You
indicate that running z/OS under VM might be the answer. But, a few
years ago, some testing
Tim,
I am not sure I have a good understanding of this.
Some background:
In our case, we have 7 physical z10 or higher machines. All the current
processors have 1 CPU, but we are looking at replacing 2 of the machines
with multi-processors. Most of the machines are running multiple z/OS
I'd like to focus a bit on one of the many unique features in the new IBM
z14: "Pause-Less Garbage Collection." The IBM z14 is the first and only
server in the world with this interesting, useful capability that works to
maintain consistent, high Java performance. There's nothing else like it.
If
OK, I'll start offering some personal thoughts on today's major
announcements, and in no particular order. I'll start in what might be an
unexpected place: sub-capacity z/VM licensing. That announcement letter is
available here:
IBM's announcement letters for July 17, 2017, are now going live across the
time zones, starting with Asia-Pacific and Japan. (Presumably over the next
few hours the versions of these announcements for other geographies will go
live.) Please watch the wrap! There's a great deal to absorb here, and
IBM's press release is available here:
https://www.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/52805.wss
Timothy Sipples
IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems, AP/GCG/MEA
E-Mail:
15 matches
Mail list logo