Beinf familier with both, they are not comparble. ;-) funny, but true.
Itschak
בתאריך יום ה׳, 19 באפר׳ 2018, 18:44, מאת Rob Schramm :
> I am not sure that is true. Seems to me the issue was that zsecure for TSS
> worked.. but that there were issues with it being
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 10:10:55 AM
Subject: Re: IBM zSecure Audit reviews?
Afail.it doesbn't support tss. Only acf2 & racf. Aid for real mf experts.
Tells only if you are in compliance or not but don't have the stig best
practice text. It is also human intensive and you'll send da
I am not sure that is true. Seems to me the issue was that zsecure for TSS
worked.. but that there were issues with it being official from the CA
standpoint.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018, 11:11 AM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> Afail.it doesbn't support tss. Only acf2 & racf. Aid for
ons and Services
Office: 512-326-6173
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 10:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM zSecure Audit reviews?
Afail.it doesb
Afail.it doesbn't support tss. Only acf2 & racf. Aid for real mf experts.
Tells only if you are in compliance or not but don't have the stig best
practice text. It is also human intensive and you'll send days & cpu to
collect data (separate phase) and manually report on each lpar.
Regulation
I've been asked to look into IBM's zSecure Audit for use with CA Top Secret and
for DISA STIG compliance.
Can anyone provide me with an unbiased review on the pros/cons of this product?
Feel free to e-mail me directly.
Thank you