Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-24 Thread David Speake
Love this product * MVS/QuickRef 7.5 * (c) If they object to my expression of affection I will never cut/paste from them again. Fair use guys? # Data Base Vendor ProductPreferred Release _ 1 M IBM Z/OS SYSTEM MSGS V1R10 Have _ IBM

Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-23 Thread Lizette Koehler
what you can. Lizette -Original Message- From: Alvaro Quintupray aquin...@bancoestado.cl Sent: Aug 23, 2012 1:02 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10 Hi. We have migrated from ZOS 1.8 to ZOS 1.10 and we are having

Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-23 Thread Scott Ford
Alvaro, Do you know how to use google .. http://www.jatomes.com/Help/VsamRc.php The rc and reason is there, 2 mins work Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Aug 23, 2012, at 4:02 PM, Alvaro Quintupray aquin...@bancoestado.cl wrote: Hi. We have migrated from ZOS 1.8 to ZOS 1.10

Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-23 Thread Quintupray Burgos Alvaro Eligio
. Alvaro. -Mensaje original- De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] En nombre de Lizette Koehler Enviado el: jueves, 23 de agosto de 2012 16:26 Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Asunto: Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10 A couple of things to check 1

Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-23 Thread Bill Fairchild
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10 Alvaro, Do you know how to use google .. http://www.jatomes.com/Help/VsamRc.php The rc and reason is there, 2 mins work Scott ford

Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-23 Thread Quintupray Burgos Alvaro Eligio
(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10 Alvaro, Do you know how to use google .. http://www.jatomes.com/Help/VsamRc.php The rc and reason is there, 2 mins work Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Aug 23, 2012, at 4:02 PM, Alvaro Quintupray aquin...@bancoestado.cl wrote: Hi. We have migrated

Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-23 Thread Ed Finnell
lookat goes back to 1.6 or so less than a minute? In a message dated 8/23/2012 4:07:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time, scott_j_f...@yahoo.com writes: The rc and reason is there, 2 mins work -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /

Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-23 Thread Scott Ford
...@rocketsoftware.com * w: www.rocketsoftware.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Scott Ford Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-23 Thread Scott Ford
. -Mensaje original- De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] En nombre de Scott Ford Enviado el: jueves, 23 de agosto de 2012 17:07 Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Asunto: Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10 Alvaro, Do you know

Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-23 Thread Lizette Koehler
Message- From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com Sent: Aug 23, 2012 3:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10 Does the vsam file verify with idcams ? If so, maybe it's the CICS file table entry... Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Aug

Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-23 Thread Scott Ford
...@bancoestado.cl To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 5:18 PM Subject: Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10 Hi  Lizette. The messages from Cics In  ESMSGLG 16.39.13 STC25178  IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257,DESAAORA,DESAAORA,SIXFILET,,, 16.39.13 STC25178

Re: IEC161I 037(108,000,IGG0CLFE)-0257 under ZOS 1.10

2012-08-23 Thread Mike Schwab
A PTF can add new error code, documented in the next release of the manual. And since the two past versions could be getting PTFs, the first manual with the changed could be version + 3. On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote: Alvaro: What is really odd is