On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:05:28 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>>...
>>Is there a general recommendation where to mount aggregates for non-IBM
>>products?
>-->Up to you. I find /usr/lpp to be as convenient as anywhere else.
>
Taking defaults for FOSS may aid compatibility.
>>The vendor says nothing
>However, /usr/lpp is in IBM's Version root which is mounted R/O.
>
>Is it proper to change Version root's mount mode temporarily to R/W and mkdir
>another mountpoint off /usr/lpp for the product I'm installing, or should this
>be avoided and made elsewhere?
-->Yes. I do this all the time.. Remem
> On 12 July 2020, at 03:50, Israel Wagshal wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:09:32 -0500, Al Ferguson
> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the insights.
>
> How do you change dynamically root filesystem's mount mode to R/W and back to
> R/O?
Using ISHELL as “root” (UID=0 or SU Command), under the FI
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 3:50 AM Israel Wagshal wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:09:32 -0500, Al Ferguson <
> afergu...@neptunescove.org> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the insights.
>
> How do you change dynamically root filesystem's mount mode to R/W and back
> to R/O?
>
as "root" or an ID with approp
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 08:54:12 +, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
Thank you, Gadi.
This is what I was missing...
>The chmount command can change a file system from Read Only to Read/Write and
>back.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 05:17:08 -0400, David Spiegel
wrote:
Yes, of course.
The only valid indirect cataloging for PARMLIBs at LOADxx processing time are:
1) ** (six asterisks)
2) *MCAT* (Master Catalog's volume)
3) &SYSRS1
That's because their value is automatically establish
Hi Israel AMV"SH,
Shavua Tov!
A side point ... If SYS1.PARMLIB is CATALOGd via a Symbolic (e.g.
&SYSR1) your IPL will fail, however, for a successful it can be CATALOGd
via VOL(*).
Regards,
David
On 2020-07-12 04:50, Israel Wagshal wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:09:32 -0500, Al Ferguson
wro
The chmount command can change a file system from Read Only to Read/Write and
back.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Israel Wagshal
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2020 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:09:32 -0500, Al Ferguson
wrote:
Thank you for the insights.
How do you change dynamically root filesystem's mount mode to R/W and back to
R/O?
What do you mean by saying "the IBM Root Filesystem is actually mount at
/ipl-vol/ "?
The Version root has to be mounted R/O o
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:30:10 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Thank you for pointing to the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard document.
Still, /usr is within the Version root, and its mounting mode must be changed
to RDWR to allow creating subdirectories under /usr/local.
Can this be done on the fly, w
Isreal,
> On 11 July 2020, at 15:30, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 12:51:04 -0500, Israel Wagshal wrote:
>>
>> I'm installing a software that has to have its own zFS aggregate mounted and
>> available.
>>
>> Looking into the
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 12:51:04 -0500, Israel Wagshal wrote:
>
>I'm installing a software that has to have its own zFS aggregate mounted and
>available.
>
>Looking into the USS filesystem I can see many IBM products' zFS aggregates
>mounted off /usr/lpp.
>I can see no foreign aggregate mounted off
Hi All,
I'm installing a software that has to have its own zFS aggregate mounted and
available.
Looking into the USS filesystem I can see many IBM products' zFS aggregates
mounted off /usr/lpp.
I can see no foreign aggregate mounted off /usr/lpp.
However, /usr/lpp is in IBM's Version root whi
13 matches
Mail list logo
