Re: Is _BPXK_SETIBMOPT_TRANSPORT would be honored by a listener ?

2014-02-22 Thread Arye Shemer
. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Arye Shemer Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2014 2:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Is _BPXK_SETIBMOPT_TRANSPORT would be honored by a listener ? I need a way to enforce

Is _BPXK_SETIBMOPT_TRANSPORT would be honored by a listener ?

2014-02-18 Thread Arye Shemer
I need a way to enforce in multi TCP/IP stacks connection to a specific stack. The listener is currently open socket to all stacks and failed by RACF for the stacks it is not allowed to. This is not nice. This is how the product behaves and we could not get from the product support any solution

Re: Is _BPXK_SETIBMOPT_TRANSPORT would be honored by a listener ?

2014-02-18 Thread Anthony Thompson
, 19 February 2014 2:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Is _BPXK_SETIBMOPT_TRANSPORT would be honored by a listener ? I need a way to enforce in multi TCP/IP stacks connection to a specific stack. The listener is currently open socket to all stacks and failed by RACF for the stacks