In <07dd01cf055e$eb92e0d0$c2b8a270$@mcn.org>, on 12/30/2013
at 07:59 AM, Charles Mills said:
>It's really a separate topic, but I think there is little doubt
>that it makes sense to edit code of any sort in some fast
>character-at-a-time interactive environment even if the target
>compile and
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2013 2:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Learning Rexx (was: Need tutorial)
On 2013-12-28, at 10:21, Charles Mills wrote:
&
In <5c8fv3f78unypshw9tyopynk.1388251271...@email.android.com>, on
12/28/2013
at 12:21 PM, Charles Mills said:
>The user-friendly interactive nature of CMS.
Rhat would seem to describe TSO as well. The only place where CMS has
a clear edge, IMHO, is XEDIT.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
On 2013-12-28, at 10:21, Charles Mills wrote:
> The user-friendly interactive nature of CMS.
>
How would you rank CMS vis-a-vis Unix System Services by
this criterion? Before USS was available I tended to edit
JCL on CMS with XEDIT; nowadays on Solaris, often accessing
legacy data sets with NF
The user-friendly interactive nature of CMS.
Charles
Composed on a mobile: please excuse my brevity
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On 2013-12-28, at 09:47, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>> Actually CMS on VM better for rexx than z/OS.
>>
>Why? (Risking an advocacy thread.)
>
>For me, one reason is the C
On 2013-12-28, at 09:47, Charles Mills wrote:
> Actually CMS on VM better for rexx than z/OS.
>
Why? (Risking an advocacy thread.)
For me, one reason is the CMS HELP facility. In fact,
sometimes coding Rexx for z/OS I'll log on to CMS merely
to use HELP REXX .
Other reasons?
-- gil
--