Re: Licensing a back-level z/OS

2021-10-25 Thread Charles Mills
ing a back-level z/OS And I can venture an unofficial answer to the licensing portion of the question, I think IBM abolished the "Single Version Charge" (SVC) limitation quite some time ago, and both z/OS Version 1 and z/OS Version 2 should have the same license charge. Th

Re: Licensing a back-level z/OS

2021-10-25 Thread Timothy Sipples
And I can venture an unofficial answer to the licensing portion of the question, I think IBM abolished the "Single Version Charge" (SVC) limitation quite some time ago, and both z/OS Version 1 and z/OS Version 2 should have the same license charge. There's a possible bit of daylight if the

Re: Licensing a back-level z/OS

2021-10-24 Thread Charles Mills
Marna, super, you are just the best. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Marna WALLE Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 3:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Licensing a back-level z/OS Charles, If one

Re: Licensing a back-level z/OS

2021-10-24 Thread Marna WALLE
Charles, If one wishes to obtain a z/OS release which is no longer marketed, it is possible. The request is for an "archive", and requires some paperwork. It usually comes through an IBM customer rep, but if you are having problems finding that person (or the Business Partner that knows how

Re: Licensing a back-level z/OS

2021-10-22 Thread Gibney, Dave
U > Subject: Re: Licensing a back-level z/OS > > When you "just called IBM" was that the actual IBM Corporation? > > Their sole point of "IBM" contact seems to be a Business Partner. I figured > out that when they say "IBM said" they mean the BP

Re: Licensing a back-level z/OS

2021-10-22 Thread Charles Mills
alf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 10:27 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Licensing a back-level z/OS We have done it on multiple occasions for 'way back' releases. Another guy in my org just called IBM and told them our problem. Now, only in one case did we need tapes

Re: Licensing a back-level z/OS

2021-10-22 Thread Tony Thigpen
We have done it on multiple occasions for 'way back' releases. Another guy in my org just called IBM and told them our problem. Now, only in one case did we need tapes and happily IBM was able to send them to us. Tony Thigpen Charles Mills wrote on 10/22/21 12:52 PM: I have a client who has

Licensing a back-level z/OS

2021-10-22 Thread Charles Mills
I have a client who has a customer that is in a pickle. Yes, of their own making, but it is what it is. Government agency, limited budgets, long procurement cycles, personnel constraints, etc. They are running z/OS V1R10 on a z114. They now have an urgent need to be able to run COBOL 6