arc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Date: Tuesday, 23 January 2024 at 09:45
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Masking SMF data internally
You talk about fields.
However user see records, not fields. Various records.
Manual editing single records with known fields is easy, however mass
At the end, you mask specific fields (which are defined in records). The
method I offered is generic. The data for this logic is unstructured, and
the translation purpose is to identify possible texts and numbers the user
might wish to hide. A loop of TRANSLATE, VERIFY and OVERLAY does need
You talk about fields.
However user see records, not fields. Various records.
Manual editing single records with known fields is easy, however mass
change can be risky.
Note: as usually *we don't know* what is the author's need. IMHO this is
the least active person in this thread.
Without that
>You can mask any character or external decimal field by using translate
As an alternative, you should run those programs on your systems and provide
them with the reports that you review for sensitive information.
.
--
For
You can mask any character or external decimal field by using translate
everything but a-z and 0 to 9 and check for minimum length (say, not less
than three characters) in order not to convert hex data. Now find the
positions and mask the original record. This way you do not care for the
actual
W dniu 22.01.2024 o 16:49, Willy Jensen pisze:
Most SMF records can be copied to a normal VB dataset. As I recall, only one or
two CICS records were really that big (or perhaps it is DB2, it's been a
while)? Anyway, you can select the record types that you need and the use SORT
to convert to
Most SMF records can be copied to a normal VB dataset. As I recall, only one or
two CICS records were really that big (or perhaps it is DB2, it's been a
while)? Anyway, you can select the record types that you need and the use SORT
to convert to normal VB.
Classification: Confidential
Use Fiale-Aid or File Manager if you have them available.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jake Anderson
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2024 12:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Masking SMF data internally
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 07:38:44 -0600, Paul Feller wrote:
>Jake, I agree you need to identify what record types are needed for the
>sizing operation. After you know which record types (and subtypes) you may
>not need to do anything. As an example, I can't think of any sensitive data
>that might
REVIEW (CBT134) can at least browse SMF VBS files.
Michael
At 12:43 AM 1/21/2024, Jake Anderson wrote:
I am not even able to browse
It says 'Invalid record length'. I tried setting the block size and LRECL
but by default it takes as
Record length': 32767
Block size : 32760
On Sun, Jan 21,
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2024 1:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Masking SMF data internally
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 09:58:29 +0400 Jake Anderson
wrote:
:>We have a requirement of sharing our SMF data to ven
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 09:58:29 +0400 Jake Anderson
wrote:
:>We have a requirement of sharing our SMF data to vendor for a sizing
:>operation of our hardware connected to our mainframe
:>Our organization has a policy of masking the critical values before sharing
:>it. I see SMF datasets are are
It is a span record format probably. Rexx can read it, it you need to be
more careful by identifying text fields. I have done that with dump
masking. Maybe I still have the code
*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 09:58:29 +0400, Jake Anderson wrote:
>Hello
>
>We have a requirement of sharing our SMF data to vendor for a sizing
>operation of our hardware connected to our mainframe
>
>
>Our organization has a policy of masking the critical values before sharing
>it. I see SMF datasets
I am not even able to browse
It says 'Invalid record length'. I tried setting the block size and LRECL
but by default it takes as
Record length': 32767
Block size : 32760
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024, 10:26 AM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> Are these files machine or human readable? As you can edit them, I
Are these files machine or human readable? As you can edit them, I believe
they are human readable and no Hex data inside. If so, write a rexx to
translate everything a-z to blanks and write back.
ITschak
*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|*
Hello
We have a requirement of sharing our SMF data to vendor for a sizing
operation of our hardware connected to our mainframe
Our organization has a policy of masking the critical values before sharing
it. I see SMF datasets are are editable from ISPF.
Is there a way or someone has undergone
17 matches
Mail list logo
