In <6758925306607968.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu>, on
08/16/2013
at 10:40 AM, Paul Gilmartin said:
>Which I attribute, in turn, to excessive[1] exposure to Assembler's
>inconsistent syntax.
It's always a mistake to expect rules for one language to apply to
another. Of course, poor
I like the notion of "further muddling reader's confusion", even
though I don't fully understand it. Formal languages differ in
syntax and programmers need to come to terms with these differences,
which will not go aweay any time soon
With my young students, who are too bright to be models for e
Thanks for your expanded example in an earlier ply.
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:34:20 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>
>>Which has nothing to do with nesting, CLIST, or TSO; it's simply Rexx
>>syntax rules,
>
>Not even that; it's a misunderstanding of REXX syntax rules.
>
Which I attribute, i
In <6ad462b1-fe57-4cd0-99c3-e51ecf16c...@aim.com>, on 08/16/2013
at 07:24 AM, Paul Gilmartin said:
>Which has nothing to do with nesting, CLIST, or TSO; it's simply Rexx
>syntax rules,
Not even that; it's a misunderstanding of REXX syntax rules.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
In
<701042851-1376627055-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-766543157-@b4.c1.bise6.blackberry>,
on 08/16/2013
at 04:24 AM, Ted MacNEIL said:
>Just with REXX it must be: "%EXEC" (or, "%CLIST").
Classic misunderstanding of REXX. The expression must *evaluate* to
%foo; the quotes are appro
On 2013-08-15, at 22:24, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
> You can call CLIST from CLIST with %clist.
> Or EXEC from, etc.
> Just with REXX it must be: "%EXEC" (or, "%CLIST").
>
Which has nothing to do with nesting, CLIST, or TSO; it's simply
Rexx syntax rules, even as:
say %EXEC /* Is a syntax error
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 23:20:50
To:
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Nested Clists
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:58:17 -0500, Raul Digestani wrote:
>It is possible call a Clist in the form %Clistname from other (main) Clist? Or
>only we can use EXEC command?
>
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:58:17 -0500, Raul Digestani wrote:
>It is possible call a Clist in the form %Clistname from other (main) Clist? Or
>only we can use EXEC command?
>The implicit call seems more versatile than EXEC cmd. so it scans all sysproc
>library.
>Thanks in advance - Raul.
>
OTOH, th
In <4987517241938904.wa.rdigestanigmail@listserv.ua.edu>, on
08/15/2013
at 02:58 PM, Raul Digestani said:
>It is possible call a Clist in the form %Clistname from other (main)
>Clist?
Well, examples in z/OS TSO/E CLISTs, SA22-7781-05 do so, e.g., 5.4.3
&SYSPROC:
IF &STR(&SYSPROC) =
It is possible call a Clist in the form %Clistname from other (main) Clist? Or
only we can use EXEC command?
The implicit call seems more versatile than EXEC cmd. so it scans all sysproc
library.
Thanks in advance - Raul.
--
For
10 matches
Mail list logo