than a normal cache hit.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Mowry, Norma E CIV DISA ESB (US)
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 5:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] Question about LSR vs HiperBatch
We are looking into using either Batch LSR (local shared resources) or
HiperBatch for batch jobs that use the same resources (VSAM files...) What (if
any) are the recommendations, pitfalls of each or is the another option to do
this? We are running z/OS V1.13.
Thanks
Norma Mowry
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Question about LSR vs HiperBatch
We are looking into using either Batch LSR (local shared resources) or
HiperBatch for batch jobs that use the same resources (VSAM files...) What (if
any) are the recommendations, pitfalls of each or is the another option to do
this? We
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Question about LSR vs HiperBatch
We are looking into using either Batch LSR (local shared resources) or
HiperBatch for batch jobs that use the same resources (VSAM files...) What
(if any) are the recommendations, pitfalls of each or is the another option
to do this? We
: Monday, June 17, 2013 10:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question about LSR vs HiperBatch
It may be worth noting that HiperBatch only caches the data component of a VSAM
cluster indeed making it quite useless for direct/random access.
DFSMS SMB makes LSR in batch real easy to use
