On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:13:49 +, Blake, Daniel J [CTR]
wrote:
>Years ago I was called to assist two different customers who both screwed up
>the only Special userid. In both cases I was able to switch to the IBM
>supplied RACF data bases that came with a ServerPac. Logged in with IBMUSER,
Mike Schwab wrote:
>Isn't that what the SYS1.UADS dataset is for? To allow signons without a
>security system?
Indeed, but these ids must be pre-defined and tested in the first place in
UADS.
Anyways, I believe the original poster who really screwed up his system, should
by now approach
Isn't that what the SYS1.UADS dataset is for? To allow signons without a
security system? And it using the 8th character as a sequence digit lead to
the 7 character TSO limit.
On Monday, August 6, 2018, Blake, Daniel J [CTR] <
00f1be92566d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Walt,
>
>
Walt,
Years ago I was called to assist two different customers who both screwed up
the only Special userid. In both cases I was able to switch to the IBM
supplied RACF data bases that came with a ServerPac. Logged in with IBMUSER,
switched back and reset the SPECIAL userid.
This was many
0595 Mobile
> 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
> robin...@sce.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Walt Farrell
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 11:57 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subj
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: RACF Question
On Thu, 25 May 2017 12:14:46 -0400, scott Ford <idfli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>In reading through the RACF manual I have a question about STC definitions.
>We have a STC that is doing RACF provisioning. The question is if I
>change th
On Thu, 25 May 2017 12:14:46 -0400, scott Ford wrote:
>In reading through the RACF manual I have a question about STC definitions.
>We have a STC that is doing RACF provisioning. The question is if I change
>the below RDEFINE from TRUSTED(YES) to TRUSTED(NO) will still be
ITschak:
todah rabah I was hoping that was the answer.
Regards,
Scott
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:23 PM, IronSphere by SecuriTeam Software <
imugz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Trusted attribute ia a kind of bypass security qhile audited. If turn it
> off, the user need to have the proper
Trusted attribute ia a kind of bypass security qhile audited. If turn it
off, the user need to have the proper authority to enter racf commands at
hia scope or enterprise widw is has a special attribute. Trusted is easier
but more risky.
ITschak
In reading through the RACF manual I have a question about STC definitions.
We have a STC that is doing RACF provisioning. The question is if I change
the below RDEFINE from TRUSTED(YES) to TRUSTED(NO) will still be able to
issue RACF commands ..we pass them through the RACF callable service
In the past when installing a new z/OS - I've always skipped the part that
says to Create or Update ICHRDNST. Instead I have copied ICHRIN03 to the
new SYS1.LPALIB
I've since forgotten why I do this. So I did some research and found that
I probably should have converted my ICHRIN03 to STARTED
gt; From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Mark Pace
> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 3:32 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: z/OS 2.2 install - racf question.
>
> In the past when installing a new z/OS - I've always skippe
ailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 3:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 2.2 install - racf question.
In the past when installing a new z/OS - I've always skipped the part that says
to Create or Update ICHRDNST. Instead I have c
Mark Pace wrote:
>Thank you. I noted in a listing of STARTED tasks I had ** with a user of
>IBMUSER. I updated it to be =MEMBER.
Both you and Alva Nims are of course correct. I do not see any problem with
that.
But I prefer to use an id, say STCUSR as user and its group, say STCGROUP. That
Can you check the the LU or LG command ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
A common error is to have the SYS1.HELP in the LINKLIST ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 16:49:13 -0400, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Joel,
Hers the exact error:
11.51.03 STC00472 CSV025I PROGRAM CONTROLLED MODULE ADDUSER NOT ACCESSED, USE
11.51.03 STC00472 IEF196I CSV025I PROGRAM CONTROLLED MODULE ADDUSER NOT ACCES
11.51.03 STC00472 IEF196I
you READ
access to the data set profile instead.
Thanks,
Craig
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 07/06/2012 15:34
Subject:RACF question
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
involved are RACF program
protected. Have the system security administrator grant you READ
access to the data set profile instead.
Thanks,
Craig
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 07/06/2012 15:34
Subject:RACF question
Sent by:IBM
of the program modules involved are RACF program
protected. Have the system security administrator grant you READ
access to the data set profile instead.
Thanks,
Craig
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 07/06/2012 15:34
Subject:RACF
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Begin forwarded message:
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
Date: July 7, 2012 4:49:13 PM EDT
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RACF question
Joel,
Hers the exact error:
11.51.03 STC00472 CSV025I PROGRAM
instead.
Thanks,
Craig
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 07/06/2012 15:34
Subject:RACF question
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
All,
I have a question, I have
I doubt it. ICH408 message(s) are what you get when RACHECK fails your
attempted access.
===
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:35:10 -0400
From: scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
Subject: RACF question
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
All,
I have a question, I have a customer receiving a csv0025i
program
protected. Have the system security administrator grant you READ
access to the data set profile instead.
Thanks,
Craig
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 07/06/2012 15:34
Subject:RACF question
Sent by:IBM
profile instead.
Thanks,
Craig
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 07/06/2012 15:34
Subject:RACF question
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
All,
I have a question, I have
25 matches
Mail list logo