RCNVTCAT under z/OS 1.13

2012-09-19 Thread Sam Golob
Hi Folks, I called up Alastair, sent him yesterday's digest, and he'll have a look. All the best of everything to all of you. Sam -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: RCNVTCAT under z/OS 1.13

2012-09-18 Thread Mark Zelden
I don't see how this ever worked. At least the version I have (but never used). I have version 1.6.0 from 14/01/2004. Maybe Alastair broke it then but to me it looks like it must have been broken since a compare function was added. Anyway, I think a simple fix for non compare processing

Re: RCNVTCAT under z/OS 1.13

2012-09-18 Thread Williamson, James R
That change worked for me. Thanks. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 1:41 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RCNVTCAT under z/OS 1.13 I don't see how

Re: RCNVTCAT under z/OS 1.13

2012-09-18 Thread Mark Zelden
Not my code, and I'm not going to spend a lot of time looking, but if you are doing a catalog compare and cat.old cat.new both are set to the same value, it seems to me that might be a problem. Maybe Alastair will get wind of this thread and clear everything up. Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden

RCNVTCAT under z/OS 1.13

2012-09-17 Thread Dana Mitchell
We just upgraded our last LPAR to 1.13 over the weekend. I noticed today that the output from RCNVTCAT (from CBT FILE 542) appears to be a tiny bit different.For each entry instead of 'CAT(catalog.name' being generated, every entry is just 'CAT(CAT'. Looking at the REXX code, I can't