Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-29 Thread David Crayford
I find a great deal of value in reading your posts, Steve. Knowing that you have experience with Amdahl in hardware adds to my respect for your insights. > On 29 Aug 2023, at 8:35 am, Steve Thompson wrote: > > Back in the day, we worked on RAS. So we put in error detection hardware >

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread David Crayford
On 29/8/2023 8:35 am, Steve Thompson wrote: What happens if a WINTEL server running MQ buys the farm? Those inflight transactions going through that server may time out and have to be re-driven. Is this considered an outage? Not if you have a second one handling the load and it takes over.

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Steve Thompson
Back in the day, we worked on RAS. So we put in error detection hardware (sometimes that was "firmware, or macrocode) and IBM and all our competitors were doing the same. And the idea was to have redundant power supplies so that a CE could do maint, and not take down the system. And if

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Bill Johnson
This is easy. Another company offering 5 9’s. https://www.sdxcentral.com/articles/sponsored/syndicated/why-five-nines-of-service-availability-matters-for-sase/2023/02/ Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Monday, August 28, 2023, 8:12 PM, David Crayford wrote: > On 29 Aug 2023, at 8:05 am,

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Bill Johnson
Welcome to 7 9’s idiot.  https://www.itmanagement101.co.uk/who-commits-to-five-nines-99-999-availability/ Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Monday, August 28, 2023, 8:12 PM, David Crayford wrote: > On 29 Aug 2023, at 8:05 am, Bill Johnson >

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread David Crayford
> On 29 Aug 2023, at 8:05 am, Bill Johnson > <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > You’re the weakest link here. How can IBM guarantee 99.999 uptime for systems > they don’t make or support? I’ve worked for numerous companies that didn’t > have outages of the mainframe

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Bill Johnson
Simple Google search turned up this company who promises 99.999. LOL https://www.serviceobjects.com/blog/weve-raised-the-bar-99-999-uptime-guarantee/ Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Monday, August 28, 2023, 7:47 PM, David Crayford wrote: > On 29 Aug 2023, at 7:41 am, Bill Johnson >

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Bill Johnson
You’re the weakest link here. How can IBM guarantee 99.999 uptime for systems they don’t make or support? I’ve worked for numerous companies that didn’t have outages of the mainframe for years. Health insurance companies can get huge fines if their systems are unavailable. I also looked on

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread David Crayford
> On 29 Aug 2023, at 7:41 am, Bill Johnson > <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > You’re ASSuming Zelle is on the mainframe. Why does it matter where it’s running. Banking applications are only as reliable as their weakest link. > Multiple 9’s is a fact and many

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Bill Johnson
You’re ASSuming Zelle is on the mainframe. Multiple 9’s is a fact and many companies are running it. You’re an idiot. More truth. Looks like you threaten people on the internet too. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Monday, August 28, 2023, 7:27 PM, David Crayford wrote: On 28/8/2023

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread David Crayford
On 28/8/2023 10:21 pm, Bill Johnson wrote: LOL, there’s Crayfish making stupid comments again. The difference between me and Perryman is I tell the truth. IBM does offer multiple 9’s uptime. And numerous banks have the setup necessary. JP Morgan (a REAL bank) spends BILLIONS per year on IT.

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Seymour J Metz
Subject: Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?] Am I the only one who remembers JES2 level sets? On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:30 AM Allan Staller < 0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Bill Johnson
My credentials are impeccable. And I don’t embellish mine like most LinkedIn accounts. Google it, fraudulent resumes are a big problem on LinkedIn. I’ve had no problem getting jobs over my 40+ years in IT. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Monday, August 28, 2023, 10:13 AM, David Crayford

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Bill Johnson
Maybe I’m Jerzy! What’s this about Dave? “As with many other people who have been warned in the past, you will find yourself constantly looking over your shoulders for an undefined period of time. That is a promise, not a threat.” Regards,  David P. Crayford  Sent from Yahoo Mail for

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread David Crayford
> On 28 Aug 2023, at 10:21 pm, Bill Johnson > <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > And numerous banks have the setup necessary. JP Morgan (a REAL bank) spends > BILLIONS per year on IT. I hope so. They’re doing a PoC for one of our products at the moment. But they

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Bill Johnson
LOL, there’s Crayfish making stupid comments again. The difference between me and Perryman is I tell the truth. IBM does offer multiple 9’s uptime. And numerous banks have the setup necessary. JP Morgan (a REAL bank) spends BILLIONS per year on IT.  Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread David Crayford
> On 28 Aug 2023, at 9:22 pm, David Spiegel > <0468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Hi David, > You said: "... he's been banging on ..." > This reminds me of a Yiddish expression that fits with this theme (and is > said to the "bang"er): Hack Mir Nisht Kain Chainik! > (In

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Bill Hitefield
ial > > > > "You never see a PTF that is 1MB" > > > > JAVA SDK's ? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > > Behalf Of Jon Perryman > > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 8:56 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Jay Maynard
al Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Jon Perryman > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 8:56 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?] > > [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Orga

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread Allan Staller
Classification: Confidential "You never see a PTF that is 1MB" JAVA SDK's ? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Perryman Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 8:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SM

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread David Spiegel
Hi David, You said: "... he's been banging on ..." This reminds me of a Yiddish expression that fits with this theme (and is said to the "bang"er): Hack Mir Nisht Kain Chainik! (In English, Don't bang the tea kettle for me!  (i.e. stop blathering)) Regards, David On 2023-08-28 07:15, David

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-28 Thread David Crayford
On 27/8/2023 11:05 am, Tom Brennan wrote: A bigger problem is Jon says things like this with such conviction and authority that other people reading these posts, perhaps years from now, will think they are true. Don't engage with him! There's no point in debating with a troll. Lately, he's

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-27 Thread Seymour J Metz
. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Joel C. Ewing Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2023 12:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?] Tthere isn't really any direct equivalence between RPM and SMP/E concepts

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-26 Thread Bill Johnson
I don’t pay attention to anyone but Kurt Quackenbush when it comes to SMPe. He’s the expert.  Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, August 27, 2023, 12:16 AM, Tom Brennan wrote: By themselves, probably few here would care.  But you used M=Maintenance and the 1MB limit as part of your

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-26 Thread Tom Brennan
By themselves, probably few here would care. But you used M=Maintenance and the 1MB limit as part of your comparison of SMP/E vs. Linux install methods. That's when it becomes more of a problem. On 8/26/2023 8:39 PM, Jon Perryman wrote: I grant you that M stands for Modification and that

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-26 Thread Jon Perryman
> On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 08:05:31 PM PDT, Tom Brennan > wrote: > A bigger problem is Jon says things like this with such conviction and > authority that other people reading these posts, perhaps years from now, > will think they are true. I grant you that M stands for Modification

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-26 Thread Bill Johnson
He has a future in politics.  Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Saturday, August 26, 2023, 11:05 PM, Tom Brennan wrote: A bigger problem is Jon says things like this with such conviction and authority that other people reading these posts, perhaps years from now, will think they are

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-26 Thread Tom Brennan
A bigger problem is Jon says things like this with such conviction and authority that other people reading these posts, perhaps years from now, will think they are true. On 8/26/2023 7:31 PM, David Spiegel wrote: Hi Jon, You said: "...The M in SMP/e stands for Maintenance ..." This statement

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-26 Thread David Spiegel
Hi Jon, Another misspeak ... You said: " ...You never see a PTF that is 1MB. ..." I've seen PTFs that are a lot bigger than 1 Mb. Regards, David On 2023-08-25 21:55, Jon Perryman wrote: On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 11:57:33 AM PDT, Steve Thompson wrote: With Linux distros there are a few

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-26 Thread David Spiegel
Hi Jon, You said: "...The M in SMP/e stands for Maintenance ..." This statement has NEVER been true. The M is an abbreviation of Modification and it has ALWAYS been this way. Regards, David On 2023-08-25 21:55, Jon Perryman wrote: On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 11:57:33 AM PDT, Steve Thompson

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-26 Thread Jon Perryman
> On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 09:32:34 PM PDT, Joel C. Ewing > wrote: > in that sense a package is similar to an FMID of a z/OS product; A Unix package name combined with the version is an SMP/e FMID. Just like Unix, a z/OS will have 1 or more FMID. Like Unix, installing 1 of the FMIDs will

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-26 Thread David Crayford
> On 26 Aug 2023, at 9:55 am, Jon Perryman wrote: > > I think z/OS uptime is 99.%. I don’t think so. IBM claim 99.999% single server uptime for z and that’s just the hardware. That’s the same as they claim for POWER running either AIX or Linux on RedHat Open Shift and what HP claim for

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-25 Thread Joel C. Ewing
Tthere isn't really any direct equivalence between RPM and SMP/E concepts of maintenance. Since a large Linux application (like LibreOffice) may be packaged as several interdependent packages, in that sense a package is similar to an FMID of a z/OS product; but the number of pieces/files

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-25 Thread Jon Perryman
> On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 11:57:33 AM PDT, Steve Thompson > wrote: > With Linux distros there are a few maint systems. The one I am > most familiar with is RPM. Linux (nor Unix) does NOT have any maint systems. P in RPM stands for Package which is the z/OS equivalent of product /

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-25 Thread Seymour J Metz
] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2023 2:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?] With Linux distros there are a few maint systems. The one I am most familiar with is RPM. To me YAST (the Linux equivalent of SMP/E) handles upgrades an

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-24 Thread Rick Troth
The list of OS and HW pairs ...     AIX-powerpc (or "ppc")     AIX-powerpc64 (or "ppc64")     CYGWIN-i386     CYGWIN-x86_64     Darwin-i386     Darwin-x86_64     Darwin-arm64     FreeBSD-i386     FreeBSD-amd64     HPUX-parisc     HPUX-ia64    

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-24 Thread Rick Troth
This topic has gotten fun. RPM has an advantage over some installer methods that it includes the architecture (e.g., "x86_64" or "s390x"). Sadly, it does *not* include the operating system (e.g., "Linux" or "OS/390"). But, yeah, effective and widely used. Tools like YUM (for RedHat) and

Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-24 Thread Seymour J Metz
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?] With Linux distros there are a few maint systems. The one I am most familiar with is RPM. To me YAST (the Linux equivalent of SMP/E) handles upgrades and user changes (if you know how to do them, I

RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed for installs?]

2023-08-24 Thread Steve Thompson
With Linux distros there are a few maint systems. The one I am most familiar with is RPM. To me YAST (the Linux equivalent of SMP/E) handles upgrades and user changes (if you know how to do them, I don't because I'm a SU in Linux -- Stupid User). Each product/component has its own main