On mainframe, BMC got it right with Control M/O/R/...
The interface is just spot on, ultra easy to quickly understand what's going on.
I don't know about the distributed app, but on mainframe, oh boy, I love CTM.
Have even seen a guy write REXX scripts to build out CTM schedule decks.
So for
W dniu 22.09.2021 o 21:06, Ward, Mike S pisze:
Anyone on here ever used Control-M from BMC? Any comments on the
Installation/Maintenance/Performance ...ET AL? Any additional products that had
to be purchased because Control-M didn't have everything it needed to run
successfully?
I don't
ot; approach
to installation/maintenance. Especially for the z/OS environment.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 12:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Control-M
[CAUTION: This Email is from ou
SAS is also notable in the "my way or the highway" approach
to installation/maintenance. Especially for the z/OS environment.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 12:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV
that's great info - I didn't know about them not supporting basic
sysplex, is that unsupported also for a single image system I wonder?
IIRC Candle's Omegamon suite was the same way - our way or no way, what
a pain.
for me IOA and the CONTROL configuration ISPF tool was far easier that
the
Classification: Confidential
From the standpoint of functionality, I consider Control-M to be one of the
Cadillacs of job schedulers.
That being said, I abhor the packaging of the product and the "my way(BMC's)
or the highway" approach to configuration and deployment.
There is one major
Thanks to all who have replied.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Ward, Mike S
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 2:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXT] Control-M
Please Note: This email is from an [EXTERNAL] sender. Do not click on links
On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Mitch Mccluhan
<005d889cebf0-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> I would suggest IWS from IBM. It is a true enterprise wide solution. I have
> been in the scheduler, production control, operations, etc areas for many
> decades and it is, in my opinion,
I would suggest IWS from IBM. It is a true enterprise wide solution. I have
been in the scheduler, production control, operations, etc areas for many
decades and it is, in my opinion, a better option.
And in openness, I am with IBM, but this is my personal opinion.
Regards,
Mitch McCluhan
At last shop we had Control-O. Excellent product. All control products require
IOA. Or did. It’s been a few years.Nice having a respected president at the
UN. Not one who got laughed at.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, September 22, 2021, 3:06 PM, Ward, Mike S wrote:
the last pace I worked had the entire CONTROL- suite of tools, so I
cannot comment on using just control-m.
in our installation from what I recall, the tool uses an ISPF dialog to
install / maintain and configure the tool.
I had the occasion to modify some CONTROL-O and CONTROL-T options and
Hi,
Please check out Control-M/Tape CTTSBD (Data Set Stacking)
-https://documents.bmc.com/supportu/INC/help/Main_help/en-US/index.htm#70522.htm.
It can be used to duplicate tape volumes.
Hope that helps,
Yifat
Disclaimer: These postings are my own and do not necessarily represent BMC's
12 matches
Mail list logo
