I was only trying to answer the question of how OA50565 allows this
to work for IDCAMS. I don't know if there was any "rational for
newly restricting JCL permission in a batch job". I would guess that
the original design of IKJTSOEV did not consider PSCBJCL or PSCBVMNT,
so they always were
; PSCBJCL and only force it on if necessary.
>
> Cheers
> Robin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jim Mulder
> Sent: 09 November 2016 10:05
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:51:59 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
>On 8 November 2016 at 22:04, Jim Mulder wrote:
>> The OA50565 fix changed the TSO/E environment service to turn on PSCBJCL
>> when running in an APF authorized jobstep (i.e. when JCSBAUTH is on).
>>
On 8 November 2016 at 22:04, Jim Mulder wrote:
> The OA50565 fix changed the TSO/E environment service to turn on PSCBJCL
> when running in an APF authorized jobstep (i.e. when JCSBAUTH is on).
> IDCAMS is linked in SYS1.LINKLIB with AC(1), so an EXEC PGM=IDCAMS jobstep
> is
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DAIR error 0470 allocating internal reader
The OA50565 fix changed the TSO/E environment service to turn on PSCBJCL
when running in an APF authorized jobstep (i.e. when JCSBAUTH is on).
IDCAMS is linked in SYS1.LINKLIB with AC(1), so an EXEC PGM=IDCAMS jobstep
The OA50565 fix changed the TSO/E environment service to turn on PSCBJCL
when running in an APF authorized jobstep (i.e. when JCSBAUTH is on).
IDCAMS is linked in SYS1.LINKLIB with AC(1), so an EXEC PGM=IDCAMS jobstep
is APF authorized.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test
I wonder if using JSTCB=YES and providing a different PSCB address in the new
JSCB.
Of course this will require a subtasks to be jobstep tasks as well ...
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:56:45 +0700 Robin Atwood wrote:
:>A venerable STC started getting 0470 ("user unauthorized
19:13
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DAIR error 0470 allocating internal reader
I don't know the answer to your question, but I appreciate the problem. It
sounds like you might be headed into a Catch-22 rabbit-hole (to mix some
metaphors). Have you considered putting some function
I don't know the answer to your question, but I appreciate the problem. It
sounds like you might be headed into a Catch-22 rabbit-hole (to mix some
metaphors). Have you considered putting some function in an auxiliary
address space? I think it's the ASCRE macro that lets you do this easily,
at