On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 16:16:32 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote:
>On 9/18/2023 1:22 PM, Tom Marchant wrote:
>> I have been unable to convince my site to increase the maximum number of
>> split screens, so I created my own ISPCFIGU that allows 32 and placed it in
>> ISPLLIB. I've shown a few other people how
On 9/18/2023 1:22 PM, Tom Marchant wrote:
I have been unable to convince my site to increase the maximum number of split
screens, so I created my own ISPCFIGU that allows 32 and placed it in ISPLLIB.
I've shown a few other people how to do it. I often use more than 8, and
sometimes more than
It is done with the TSO ISPCCONF command from within ISPF.
Option 7 will convert the configuration table that is currently loaded to
source that you can edit.
After making your changes, option 4 will build the table load module.
The table load module is placed in a data set in your ISPLLIB
Huh. I remember the default limit of eight, but don't think about it much; I
think my usual max is four or five. At three or four I start using SCRNAME and
closing down unused screens.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* How much better for us if all humans died in
I have done this, too. Since I’m on vacation, I couldn’t remember all the steps
to do this, so I didn’t want to mention it.
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 18, 2023, at 13:22, Tom Marchant
> <000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> I have been unable to convince my site to
I have been unable to convince my site to increase the maximum number of split
screens, so I created my own ISPCFIGU that allows 32 and placed it in ISPLLIB.
I've shown a few other people how to do it. I often use more than 8, and
sometimes more than 16.
--
Tom Marchant
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023
gt;
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Sri h Kolusu
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 1:38 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: I have an Idea for ISPF...
>
>>> For example, go to SDSF, then do DSLIST, then
but that doesn't help anyone
else.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sri
h Kolusu
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 1:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: I have an Idea for ISPF...
>> For example, go to SDSF, then do DSLIST, then browse
>> For example, go to SDSF, then do DSLIST, then browse a data set from the
>> list, then find something, then PF5 (RFIND). It won't work, because SDSF's
>> PF5 is not RFIND; it is IFIND and there's no RFIND defined in ISFCMDS.
I reported this to IBM YEARS ago but they haven't fixed it.
en't fixed it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sri
h Kolusu
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 12:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: I have an Idea for ISPF...
>> the command line that eventually leads to another FTOPEN. This is like
>> saying th
>> the command line that eventually leads to another FTOPEN. This is like
>> saying that "why are you making left turns? You can just make a bunch of
>> right turns instead". The capability exists, it should work.
Michael,
In your case since you are EDITING the supec generated JCL in batch, it
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: I have an Idea for ISPF...
>> Then in that Edit session, I enter DSLIST and a pattern that leads to a
>> library. From the DSLIST, I browse the library, and enter SRCHFOR something.
>> That creates a second FTOPEN TEMP to build the
>> Then in that Edit session, I enter DSLIST and a pattern that leads to a
>> library. From the DSLIST, I browse the library, and enter SRCHFOR something.
>> That creates a second FTOPEN TEMP to build the input to the search, on top
>> of the previous one, all within the same ISPF session. What
be tested using purely standard
out-of-the-box ISPF functions.)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sri
h Kolusu
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 10:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: I have an Idea for ISPF...
>>- Not sure how this
>>- Not sure how this would help. Would it change the data set name generated
>>by FTOPEN TEMP? And in a way that would create a different data set in a
>>stacked session?
Michael,
If they are pre-allocated, then you would have Individual list/work datasets
for each stacked session. So, it
set in a stacked
session?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sri
h Kolusu
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 5:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: I have an Idea for ISPF...
>> The reason is because FTOPEN TEMP creates the file name
>> Is there reason not to use BLKSIZE=0, which has been preferred for over a
>> decade (but may not work with COBOL.)
Gil,
You can use BLKSIZE=0, but also code DSORG=PS , so that SMS calculates the
Optimum Blksize based on the LRECL
Thanks,
Kolusu
Still recommended for z/OS 2.3.
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.3.0?topic=performance-preallocate-ispf-temporary-data-sets-vio
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 6:11 PM Paul Gilmartin
<042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 22:47:49 +, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
> >
>
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 22:47:49 +, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>
>//ISPCTL0 DD UNIT=SYSVIO,SPACE=(CYL,(10,2)),
>// DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=800)
>
Is there reason not to use BLKSIZE=0, which has been preferred
for over a decade (but may not work with COBOL.)
(At times I've published
>> The reason is because FTOPEN TEMP creates the file name using an ISPF "CNTL"
>> file, which follows a certain naming format. For example:
>> userid.lpar.SPFTEMPn.CNTL, where "n" is the logical session number. In a
>> stacked session it is still the same session number, hence there's a naming
20 matches
Mail list logo