List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dan D
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 12:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: :Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
Hi Skip,
Have you checked the ISPF command table for your command?
=3.9 then change the table
Hi Skip,
Have you checked the ISPF command table for your command?
=3.9 then change the table to ISP.
We have quite a few CLISTs there ...
WHOAMI3 SELECT CMD(%WHOAMI)
Then a WHOAMI CLIST that checks for ISPF and pops up a window with user info.
If it's not within ISPF it just WRITES
gt; From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of CM Poncelet
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 6:04 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: :Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
>
> FWIW
>
> The oddity is that
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of CM Poncelet
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 6:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: :Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
FWIW
The oddity is that there are *no* edit macro statements after "ISREDIT MACRO
(PARMSTR)". So why is an
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 04:37:19 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
>
>... made the "ISREDIT MACRO (PARMSTR)" statement wholly irrelevant
>(because no actual *edit* commands then followed it). All the commands
>that *did* follow it could be issued in native Clist or REXX, without a
>preceding "ISREDIT MACRO"
*Any* commands that can be issued in a Clist or REXX proc (e.g. "ISPEXEC
SELECT PGM(J00YCKAL) PARM(JLRCL)" etc.)can also be issued in an edit
macro. But *only edit* statements (e.g. "EXCLUDE ALL P'¬'" then "CHANGE
ALL P'.' ' ' NX" etc.) can be issued in edit macros. The point I was
making was that
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 02:04:25 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
>FWIW
>
>The oddity is that there are *no* edit macro statements after "ISREDIT
>MACRO (PARMSTR)". So why is an edit macro declared in the Clist?
>
>E.g. "ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(J00YCKAL) PARM(JLRCL)" etc.can be issued
>directly from the Clist
n List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2017 8:31 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
>
> Typically the user is EDITing a PDS Member with JCL and enters
, 2017 8:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
Typically the user is EDITing a PDS Member with JCL and enters JEM on the
command line
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IB
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 02:59:02 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
>
>As for the 'mysteries', I would guess that IBM published a PTF to
>*enforce* the rule that edit macros should always begin with 'ISREDIT
>MACRO' - and had previously been ignored. ...
>
For Rexx, at least, I've always experienced an
LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
>
> There are two parms for this Clist: DSJNAME and PARMSTR. How is JEM invoked?
> (E.g. it could be invoked as "TSO JEM HLQ.DSJN1.THEREST MACPARM2".)
>
> On 27/08/2017 18:25, Feller, Paul wr
*
>
> Thanks..
>
> Paul Feller
> AGT Mainframe Technical Support
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2017 12:11
> To: IBM-MAIN@
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of CM Poncelet
> Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2017 2:36 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
>
> FWIW
> (a) The "ISREDIT
August 26, 2017 2:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
FWIW
(a) The "ISREDIT MACRO" should be the *1st* executable statement; there should
be no "PROC 0 " in edit macros - unless the edit macro is actually
em
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
FWIW
(a) The "ISREDIT MACRO" should be the *1st* executable statement; there should
be no "PROC 0 " in edit macros - unless the edit macro is actually
embedded in the Clist (a bit unusual).
(b) Anyquote
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 12:48:56 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>Did you use ISRDDN and search for JEM? Just to verify what you see.
>
>Only time I see this is when a CLIST is on SYSEXEC
>
ISRDDN is badly broken. I've reported this and received WAD. If a DDNAME is a
mixed
cocatenation of UNIX
FWIW
(a) The "ISREDIT MACRO" should be the *1st* executable statement; there
should be no "PROC 0 " in edit macros - unless the edit macro
is actually embedded in the Clist (a bit unusual).
(b) Anyquotes should be enclosed in both '/*' and '*/' open/closing
chars, even in Clist.
The usual way to
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 15:27:21 +, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
>OK, this is a weird one. We have an old CLIST that runs as an ISPF edit macro.
>On one sysplex only, this CLIST fails with a *Rexx* error message:
>...snipped...
>
>What might cause a CLIST to be
Did you use ISRDDN and search for JEM? Just to verify what you see.
Only time I see this is when a CLIST is on SYSEXEC
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: Saturday, August 26,
On 2017-08-26, at 10:21, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> Macro is invoked by simply typing JEM on the command line. I have not found
> any user for whom it works today. (I was not the original reporter.) No
> ALTLIBs in effect at error time.
>
> FYI JEM is a JCL validation product that we have run
, August 26, 2017 9:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
How is the macro invoked? On the SYSPLEX in question, do all users experience
the problem? For a user who does, are any ALTLIBs in effect when the error
occurs
How is the macro invoked? On the SYSPLEX in question, do all users
experience the problem? For a user who does, are any ALTLIBs in effect when
the error occurs?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
>
22 matches
Mail list logo