Peter thank you
I did a TESTAUTH ‘JOER.TEST.AUTHLIB(CESTAE)’
Then at the TESTAUTH prompt
Did LOAD ‘JOER.TEST.AUTHLIB(GRECOV)’
AT GRECOV.GRECOV.+0
Had a WAIT after the lock release
Grecov did get control
It had an SDWARBAD the X’40’ bit was on at the first status byte of the RB
RBSTAB1
On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 06:21:34 -0800 Ed Jaffe
<05acc3c79bf7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
:>On 3/2/2024 5:46 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
:>> Regarding the response about "why CIRB", it was not really on point. You
likely do not need to build/touch IQE/IRB. The parameters on SCHEDIRB (such
On 3/2/2024 5:46 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
Regarding the response about "why CIRB", it was not really on point. You likely
do not need to build/touch IQE/IRB. The parameters on SCHEDIRB (such as EPPTR, MODE, KEY
et al) generally cover all the pieces of data that you would set in the IRB. They do
It is perfectly valid to "have" an ESTAE-type recovery routine while you hold a
lock or are disabled.
You might not be able to set it in that environment (the OP's code set the
ESTAEX while not in either of those states), but if you set it before, it will
participate. Branch-entry ESTAE has
nframe Discussion List on behalf of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 1:50:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Recovery routine for IRB
ITYM RQE/IRB.
Doees the IQE stll exist?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַ
equ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 11:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Recovery routine for IRB
Peter
Thanks for suggesting that I put a wait after the release of the lock since
as Rob Scott pointed the estate will not run while the lock is held
I chose to use th
to initialize the RB or IRB
>
> Thank You
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Peter Relson
> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 9:36 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Recovery routine for IRB
>
> If an
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter Relson
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 9:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Recovery routine for IRB
If an ESTAE-type recovery routine (whether ESTAE or ESTAEX or ARR or IEAARR)
is established when the IRB blows up, it will get
Robert,
This invoice has been paid for credit to your account tonight.
Mike
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 9:36 AM Peter Relson wrote:
> If an ESTAE-type recovery routine (whether ESTAE or ESTAEX or ARR or
> IEAARR) is established when the IRB blows up, it will get control.
> Therefore we conclude
If an ESTAE-type recovery routine (whether ESTAE or ESTAEX or ARR or IEAARR) is
established when the IRB blows up, it will get control. Therefore we conclude
that that is not the case.
What you have shown is not a "recovery routine for IRB" but rather a recovery
routine for the mainline that
hold locks, or are in SRB mode cannot use
> ESTAE-type recovery routines.”
>
> Rob Scott
> Rocket Software
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Seymour J Metz
> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 12:44 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re:
12:44 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Recovery routine for IRB
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
>
>
> Does ESTAE support code that holds a lock? I suspect tthat you need an ARR or
> FRR?
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~s
Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 12:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Recovery routine for IRB
EXTERNAL EMAIL
Does ESTAE support code that holds a lock? I suspect tthat you need an ARR or
FRR?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http
Does ESTAE support code that holds a lock? I suspect tthat you need an ARR or
FRR?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Joseph
14 matches
Mail list logo
