> Won't DFSORT manage the SORTWORKs?
Gil/John,
Dave Betten already answered the question below.
"You use SORTDD= in the parameter lists to pass a separate prefix for each
sort.
For example you might pass SORTDD=SRT1 for the first one, SORDD=SRT2 for
the second, etc.
That way each will allocate
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:21 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:43:26 -0600, John McKown wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:18 PM Tom Marchant wrote:
> >
> >> We have a multitasking address space in which we would like to
> >>
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:43:26 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:18 PM Tom Marchant wrote:
>
>> We have a multitasking address space in which we would like to
>> call sort to sort somewhere around a half a million entries.
>> There is a possibility that more than one task might
and Systems Performance
IBM Corporation
email: bet...@us.ibm.com
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
11/12/2019 01:43:26 PM:
> From: John McKown
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 11/12/2019 01:44 PM
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Sort in a multitasking address space
> Sent by
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:18 PM Tom Marchant <
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> We have a multitasking address space in which we would like to
> call sort to sort somewhere around a half a million entries.
> There is a possibility that more than one task might need to
>
If you provide non-conflicting ddname lists then I would expect it to work,
storage permitting.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom
Marchant
30 years ago I wrote something that ATTACHed multiple TCBs, each calling
ICEMAN. This worked fine but I needed to
1) Create the control cards appropriately
2) Make sure there weren't any data set collisions
In fact my use case was read the same SORTIN and sort it different ways -
in parallel.
